IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v101y2025ics0047235225001710.html

Exploring the factors that differentiate individual and group offenders in cyber-dependent crime

Author

Listed:
  • Bekkers, L.M.J.
  • Holt, T.J.
  • Leukfeldt, E.R.

Abstract

Not much is known about the characteristics of solo offenders relative to group offenders engaged in cyber-dependent crime. This cross-sectional survey study utilized a general population sample of 1240 Dutch young people. Respondents completed a battery of validated measurements that measured lifetime offending behaviors and screened for risk factors. Multinominal regression models were estimated to explore the factors that differentiate solo offenders from group offenders engaged in low-tech and high-tech forms of cybercrime. Analyses revealed that solo offenders showed a different profile than those who offend together with others, and that correlates were particularly dependent on the level of technical sophistication of crimes. Low-tech solo offenders seemed to act more opportunistically, whereas high-tech solo offenders had programming skills and higher levels of self-control. Findings imply that co-offending in cyber-dependent crime may be more of an instrumental choice for offenders who have insufficient capabilities to offend alone.

Suggested Citation

  • Bekkers, L.M.J. & Holt, T.J. & Leukfeldt, E.R., 2025. "Exploring the factors that differentiate individual and group offenders in cyber-dependent crime," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:101:y:2025:i:c:s0047235225001710
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102522
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235225001710
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102522?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert A Roks & E Rutger Leukfeldt & James A Densley, 2021. "The Hybridization of Street Offending in the Netherlands," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 61(4), pages 926-945.
    2. Hochstetler, Andy & Copes, Heith & DeLisi, Matt, 2002. "Differential association in group and solo offending," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 559-566.
    3. Lazarus, Suleman & Soares, Adebayo Benedict, 2025. "From business centres to hustle kingdoms: historical perspectives on innovative models of deviant education," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 127137, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Scott W. Duxbury & Dana L. Haynie, 2018. "The Network Structure of Opioid Distribution on a Darknet Cryptomarket," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 921-941, December.
    5. D'Alessio, Stewart J. & Stolzenberg, Lisa, 2010. "Do cities influence co-offending?," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 711-719, July.
    6. Thomas J. Holt, 2013. "Exploring the social organisation and structure of stolen data markets," Global Crime, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2-3), pages 155-174, May.
    7. Cheolho Yoon, 2011. "Theory of Planned Behavior and Ethics Theory in Digital Piracy: An Integrated Model," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 100(3), pages 405-417, May.
    8. Ward, Jeffrey T. & Forney, Megan, 2020. "Unpacking within- and between-person effects of unstructured socializing and differential association on solo- and co-offending," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Appleyard, Mathew, 2015. "Corporate responses to online music piracy: Strategic lessons for the challenge of additive manufacturing," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 69-76.
    2. Soukaina Abdallah-Ou-Moussa & Martin Wynn & Omar Kharbouch, 2025. "Blockchain, Cryptocurrencies, and Decentralized Finance: A Case Study of Financial Inclusion in Morocco," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-25, July.
    3. Hong, Sunmin & Jeong, Dohyo & Kim, Pyung, 2024. "Have offender demographics changed since the COVID-19 pandemic? Evidence from money mules in South Korea," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    4. Hoeben, Evelien M. & Meldrum, Ryan C. & Walker, D'Andre & Young, Jacob T.N., 2016. "The role of peer delinquency and unstructured socializing in explaining delinquency and substance use: A state-of-the-art review," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 108-122.
    5. Dario Miocevic & Ivana Kursan Milakovic, 2023. "How ethical and political identifications drive adaptive behavior in the digital piracy context," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), pages 256-273, January.
    6. Zhaohua Wang & Xiaoyang Dong, 2016. "Determinants and policy implications of residents’ new energy vehicle purchases: the evidence from China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 82(1), pages 155-173, May.
    7. Łukasz Tomczyk, 2021. "Evaluation of Digital Piracy by Youths," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-26, January.
    8. Lange, Juliane & Stahl, Florian & Vossen, Gottfried, 2016. "Datenmarktplätze in verschiedenen Forschungsdisziplinen: Eine Übersicht," Arbeitsberichte des Instituts für Wirtschaftsinformatik 138, University of Münster, Department of Information Systems.
    9. Dan Wu & Guofang Nan & Minqiang Li, 2020. "Optimal Piracy Control: Should a Firm Implement Digital Rights Management?," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 947-960, August.
    10. Pukkapop Kongkajaroen, 2014. "The Influence of Green Condominium Purchase Attitude toward Intention to Purchase: Generation Y Consumers," ERES eres2014_123, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    11. Chao Wu & Shuling Liang & Weijiong Wu & Yuxiang Hong, 2021. "Practicing Green Residence Business Model Based on TPB Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-11, July.
    12. Casidy, Riza & Phau, Ian & Lwin, Michael, 2016. "The role of religious leaders on digital piracy attitude and intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 244-252.
    13. Ritika Chopra & Anirudh Agrawal & Gagan Deep Sharma & Andreas Kallmuenzer & Laszlo Vasa, 2024. "Uncovering the organizational, environmental, and socio-economic sustainability of digitization: evidence from existing research," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 685-709, February.
    14. Kuang, Yu Flora & Lee, Gladys, 2017. "Corporate fraud and external social connectedness of independent directors," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 401-427.
    15. Mauricio S. Featherman & Nick Hajli, 2016. "Self-Service Technologies and e-Services Risks in Social Commerce Era," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(2), pages 251-269, December.
    16. Lara Stocchi & Naser Pourazad & Nina Michaelidou & Arry Tanusondjaja & Paul Harrigan, 2022. "Marketing research on Mobile apps: past, present and future," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 195-225, March.
    17. Dennis B. Desmond & David Lacey & Paul Salmon, 2019. "Evaluating cryptocurrency laundering as a complex socio-technical system," Journal of Money Laundering Control, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 22(3), pages 480-497, July.
    18. Rotem Shneor & Prince Baah-Peprah & Joe Cox & Thang Nguyen, 2026. "Acting on Good Intentions? A Longitudinal Study of Prosocial Lending Intentions and Behaviours," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 203(4), pages 863-882, February.
    19. Barbara Culiberg & Domen Bajde, 2014. "Do You Need a Receipt? Exploring Consumer Participation in Consumption Tax Evasion as an Ethical Dilemma," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 124(2), pages 271-282, October.
    20. Izzatul Jannah & Muamar Nur Kholid, 2020. "Ethics theory and theory of reasoned action in e-book piracy: An empirical study of accounting students," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 9(3), pages 114-122, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:101:y:2025:i:c:s0047235225001710. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.