IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v69y2016i1p349-356.html

A typology of brand counterfeiting and imitation based on a semiotic approach

Author

Listed:
  • Le Roux, André
  • Bobrie, François
  • Thébault, Marinette

Abstract

Counterfeiting and imitation are major issues for luxury products and brands. This research proposes a conceptualization of brand based on a semiotic approach and a typology of counterfeit and imitation comprising two dimensions: logotype and product appearance. A survey testing stimuli developed according to the typology explores consumer reactions to different modalities of counterfeiting and imitation on five brands. A dominant categorization schema based on brand name emerged, although some product categories deviate from this pattern. The discussion draws implications for brand research, suggesting that typicality may explain the dichotomy in the categorization schema and acceptability of stimuli, as well as managerial implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Le Roux, André & Bobrie, François & Thébault, Marinette, 2016. "A typology of brand counterfeiting and imitation based on a semiotic approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 349-356.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:69:y:2016:i:1:p:349-356
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.08.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296315003446
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.08.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van Horen, Femke & Pieters, Rik, 2012. "Consumer evaluation of copycat brands: The effect of imitation type," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 246-255.
    2. Loken, Barbara & Ward, James C, 1990. "Alternative Approaches to Understanding the Determinants of Typicality," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 17(2), pages 111-126, September.
    3. Bian, Xuemei & Moutinho, Luiz, 2009. "An investigation of determinants of counterfeit purchase consideration," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 368-378, March.
    4. Catherine Viot & André Le Roux & Florence Kremer, 2014. "Attitude towards the purchase of counterfeits: antecedents and effect on intention to purchase [Attitude envers l'achat de contrefaçons : déterminants et effet sur l'intention d'achat]," Post-Print hal-01803846, HAL.
    5. Calder, Bobby J & Phillips, Lynn W & Tybout, Alice M, 1982. "The Concept of External Validity," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 9(3), pages 240-244, December.
    6. Fiona Scott Morton & Florian Zettelmeyer, 2004. "The Strategic Positioning of Store Brands in Retailer--Manufacturer Negotiations," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 24(2), pages 161-194, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Grigorescu Adriana & Ion Amalia Elena, 2020. "Innovation and product management – The direction of the 21st century luxury market," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 1035-1045, July.
    2. Crettez, Bertrand & Hayek, Naila & Zaccour, Georges, 2018. "Brand imitation: A dynamic-game approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 139-155.
    3. Qian Shang & Guanxiong Pei & Jia Jin & Wuke Zhang & Yuran Wang & Xiaoyi Wang, 2018. "ERP evidence for consumer evaluation of copycat brands," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-13, February.
    4. Adriana Grigorescu & Amalia-Elena Ion, 2022. "Qualitative Analysis of Sustainability and Innovation Within the Luxury Business Sector," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(4), pages 3150-3171, December.
    5. André Le Roux & Marinette Thébault & Yves Roy, 2019. "Exploring consumer behavior regarding counterfeiting: how product category, product attributes, purchase situation and consumers' motivations profiles impact behavior regarding counterfeits and genuin," Post-Print hal-02396977, HAL.
    6. Trestini, Samuele & Giampietri, Elisa & Szathvary, Serena & Dal Bianco, Andrea, . "Insights on the Alleged Imitation of Prosecco Wine Name: The Case of the German Market," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 9(4).
    7. André Le Roux & Marinette Thébault & Yves Roy, 2019. "Do product category and consumers' motivations profiles matter regarding counterfeiting?," Post-Print hal-02396896, HAL.
    8. Wang, Yingjia & Fan, Di & Fung, Yi-Ning & Luo, Suyuan, 2022. "Consumer-to-consumer product exchanges for original fashion brands in the sharing economy: Good or bad for fashion knockoffs?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    9. Song, Hanqun & Yang, Huijun & Ma, Emily, 2022. "Restaurants’ outdoor signs say more than you think: An enquiry from a linguistic landscape perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    10. Wang, Li & Jin, Manhui & Yang, Zhiyong, 2020. "Regulatory focus and consumption of counterfeit luxury goods: Roles of functional theories of attitudes and perceived similarity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 50-61.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. André Le Roux & Marinette Thébault & François Bobrie, 2015. "Typicality impact on brand imitations evaluation and categorization," Post-Print halshs-02530211, HAL.
    2. Saurabh Mishra & Demetrios Vakratsas & Alexander V. Krasnikov, 2018. "Protecting positioning innovations: the emergence of non-traditional trademark registrations," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 307-318, September.
    3. Pueschel, Julia & Chamaret, Cécile & Parguel, Béatrice, 2017. "Coping with copies: The influence of risk perceptions in luxury counterfeit consumption in GCC countries," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 184-194.
    4. Carsten Fink & Andrea Fosfuri & Christian Helmers & Amanda F. Myers, 2022. "Submarine trademarks," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 818-840, November.
    5. Van Horen, Femke & Pieters, Rik, 2013. "Preference reversal for copycat brands: Uncertainty makes imitation feel good," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 54-64.
    6. André Le Roux & Marinette Thébault & Yves Roy, 2019. "Exploring consumer behavior regarding counterfeiting: how product category, product attributes, purchase situation and consumers' motivations profiles impact behavior regarding counterfeits and genuin," Post-Print hal-02396977, HAL.
    7. André Le Roux & Marinette Thébault & Yves Roy, 2019. "Do product category and consumers' motivations profiles matter regarding counterfeiting?," Post-Print hal-02396896, HAL.
    8. Zha, Yong & Guo, Xiaowei & Chen, Huaping & Ling, Liuyi, 2022. "How does Store Branded Lookalike Packaging Affect Competition in a Dyadic Supply Chain: A Consumer Confusion Perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    9. Sandra Horvat & Tanja Komarac & Durdana Ozretic Dosen, 2021. "Perceived Private Label Authenticity: A Two-Study Analysis," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 33(SI), pages 47-66.
    10. Sugathan, Praveen & Ranjan, Kumar Rakesh, 2020. "When co-production fails: The role of customer’s internal attributions and impression management concerns," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 535-548.
    11. Prami Sengupta & Randall Cantrell, 2021. "Context Matters: The effects of budgetary and knowledge constraints on residential energy conservation," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 11(4), pages 561-573, December.
    12. Arcan Nalca, & Tamer Boyaci, & Saibal Ray, 2017. "Brand positioning and consumer taste information," ESMT Research Working Papers ESMT-17-01_R1, ESMT European School of Management and Technology, revised 04 Dec 2017.
    13. Xue Li & Xiaoqiang Cai & Jian Chen, 2022. "Quality and Private Label Encroachment Strategy," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(1), pages 374-390, January.
    14. Truong, Yann & McColl, Rod, 2011. "Intrinsic motivations, self-esteem, and luxury goods consumption," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(6), pages 555-561.
    15. Marshall Freimer & Dan Horsky, 2008. "Try It, You Will Like It—Does Consumer Learning Lead to Competitive Price Promotions?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(5), pages 796-810, 09-10.
    16. Wang, Bin & Shu, Min & Liu, Yunyao & Xie, Fengyuan & Wang, Jin, 2024. "Who do you want to purchase with? The effect of naming strategy on consumer participation in online group purchase," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    17. ter Braak, Anne & Geyskens, Inge & Dekimpe, Marnik G., 2014. "Taking private labels upmarket: Empirical generalizations on category drivers of premium private label introductions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 125-140.
    18. Simon Blanchard & Wayne DeSarbo & A. Atalay & Nukhet Harmancioglu, 2012. "Identifying consumer heterogeneity in unobserved categories," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 177-194, March.
    19. Nestor Duch-Brown, 2017. "Platforms to business relations in online platform ecosystems," JRC Working Papers on Digital Economy 2017-07, Joint Research Centre.
    20. Milad Haghani & Michiel C. J. Bliemer & John M. Rose & Harmen Oppewal & Emily Lancsar, 2021. "Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part I. Integrative synthesis of empirical evidence and conceptualisation of external validity," Papers 2102.02940, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:69:y:2016:i:1:p:349-356. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.