IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v69y2016i11p5181-5186.html

Qualitative comparative analysis, crisp and fuzzy sets in knowledge and innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Huarng, Kun-Huang
  • Roig-Tierno, Norat

Abstract

Studies indicate that the academic management and social science studies are of low relevancy and impact and even limited in usefulness. Some other studies point out that qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) are more advanced approaches for data analysis and theory construction. To promote the concepts and approaches of QCA and fsQCA, this special issue of Journal of Business Research collects articles regarding “Qualitative Comparative Analysis, Crisp and Fuzzy Sets in Knowledge and Innovation.” The authors of these studies presented them at the 2016 Global Innovation and Knowledge Academy Conference, in Valencia, Spain, from March 20 to March 23. After double blind reviews, only 59 articles appear in this special issue.

Suggested Citation

  • Huarng, Kun-Huang & Roig-Tierno, Norat, 2016. "Qualitative comparative analysis, crisp and fuzzy sets in knowledge and innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5181-5186.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:69:y:2016:i:11:p:5181-5186
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296316302892
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.109?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ragin, Charles C., 2000. "Fuzzy-Set Social Science," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, edition 1, number 9780226702773, May.
    2. Kuratko, Donald F. & Hornsby, Jeffrey S. & Covin, Jeffrey G., 2014. "Diagnosing a firm's internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 37-47.
    3. Sascha Kraus & Ilkka Kauranen & Carl Henning Reschke, 2011. "Identification of domains for a new conceptual model of strategic entrepreneurship using the configuration approach," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 34(1), pages 58-74, January.
    4. Gary Hamel, 1991. "Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(S1), pages 83-103, June.
    5. Woodside, Arch G., 2014. "Embrace•perform•model: Complexity theory, contrarian case analysis, and multiple realities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(12), pages 2495-2503.
    6. repec:ucp:bkecon:9780226702766 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Di Paola, Nadia & Chari, Simos & Iannacci, Federico & Kraus, Sascha, 2025. "Configurational theory in business and management research: Status quo and guidelines for the application of qualitative comparative analysis (QCA)," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    2. Carmona-Lavado, Antonio & Cuevas-Rodríguez, Gloria & Cabello-Medina, Carmen & Fedriani, Eugenio M., 2021. "Does open innovation always work? The role of complementary assets," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    3. Romero-Castro, Noelia & Piñeiro-Chousa, Juan & Pérez-Pico, Ada, 2021. "Dealing with heterogeneity and complexity in the analysis of the willingness to invest in community renewable energy in rural areas," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    4. Osakwe, Christian Nedu & Ogunmokun, Oluwatobi A. & Elgammal, Islam & Kwarteng, Michael Adu, 2025. "Individuals' attitudes and their adoption intentions of central bank digital currency: Combining theories and analytics for deeper insights," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    5. Jinhua Xie & Gangqiao Yang & Ge Wang & Xiaojie Zhang, 2025. "Sustainable land use in central China: the effects of different livelihood capital configurations on farmers’ ecological production behaviors," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 5225-5251, February.
    6. Boratyńska, Katarzyna & Grzegorzewska, Emilia, 2018. "Bankruptcy prediction in the agribusiness sector: Lessons from quantitative and qualitative approaches," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 175-181.
    7. Sheng, Margaret L. & Chien, Iting, 2016. "Rethinking organizational learning orientation on radical and incremental innovation in high-tech firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(6), pages 2302-2308.
    8. Russo, Ivan & Confente, Ilenia, 2019. "From dataset to qualitative comparative analysis (QCA)—Challenges and tricky points: A research note on contrarian case analysis and data calibration," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 129-135.
    9. Russo, Ivan & Confente, Ilenia & Gligor, David M. & Autry, Chad W., 2016. "To be or not to be (loyal): Is there a recipe for customer loyalty in the B2B context?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 888-896.
    10. Roh, Saeyeon & Haddoud, Mohamed Yacine & Emmanuel Onjewu, Adah-Kole & Jang, Hyunmi & Thai, Vinh, 2025. "Revisiting the impact of container port service quality on customer satisfaction: A configuration approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 221-231.
    11. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:3b:p:827-837 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Stephan M. Liozu & Sven Feurer & Andreas Hinterhuber & Arch Woodside, 2021. "Configurational theory and practices of firms employing multiple pricing policies: assessing effective and ineffective pricing recipes in multiple firm contexts," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(4), pages 420-435, August.
    13. Raïes, Karine & Mühlbacher, Hans & Gavard-Perret, Marie-Laure, 2015. "Consumption community commitment: Newbies' and longstanding members' brand engagement and loyalty," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(12), pages 2634-2644.
    14. Ren, Shengce & Tsai, Huei-Ting & Eisingerich, Andreas B., 2016. "Case-based asymmetric modeling of firms with high versus low outcomes in implementing changes in direction," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 500-507.
    15. Bleoju, Gianita & Capatina, Alexandru & Rancati, Elisa & Lesca, Nicolas, 2016. "Exploring organizational propensity toward inbound–outbound marketing techniques adoption: The case of pure players and click and mortar companies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5524-5528.
    16. Ferguson, Graham & Megehee, Carol M. & Woodside, Arch G., 2017. "Culture, religiosity, and economic configural models explaining tipping-behavior prevalence across nations," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 218-233.
    17. Pappas, Nikolaos & Caputo, Andrea & Pellegrini, Massimiliano Matteo & Marzi, Giacomo & Michopoulou, Eleni, 2021. "The complexity of decision-making processes and IoT adoption in accommodation SMEs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 573-583.
    18. Scarpi, Daniele & Pizzi, Gabriele & Raggiotto, Francesco & Mason, Michela, 2018. "A qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) of satisfaction toward extreme sporting Events," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 358-368.
    19. Boratyńska, Katarzyna, 2016. "FsQCA in corporate bankruptcy research. An innovative approach in food industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5529-5533.
    20. Katarzyna Boratyńska, 2021. "A New Approach for Risk of Corporate Bankruptcy Assessment during the COVID-19 Pandemic," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-14, December.
    21. Shi, Xiaoxiao & Evans, Richard & Shan, Wei, 2022. "Solver engagement in online crowdsourcing communities: The roles of perceived interactivity, relationship quality and psychological ownership," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:69:y:2016:i:11:p:5181-5186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.