IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v131y2021icp573-583.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The complexity of decision-making processes and IoT adoption in accommodation SMEs

Author

Listed:
  • Pappas, Nikolaos
  • Caputo, Andrea
  • Pellegrini, Massimiliano Matteo
  • Marzi, Giacomo
  • Michopoulou, Eleni

Abstract

The current competitive scenario is fast-moving toward an integration of sophisticated technological innovations, i.e. smart solutions for hospitality, in particular the accommodation industry. Internet of Things (IoT) technologies are able to connect and let communicate different devices to craft a personalized customer experience. Given the undeniable impact for the hospitality sector, the decisions about adopting smart solutions are not always linear: benefits and limitations co-exist and need to be weighed against each other. By adopting fsQCA, this paper compares several decision-making factors that may influence the willingness to adopt IoT, surveying owners/managers in the Greek accommodation industry. Results show four types of decision-making: (i) rational, a weighted evaluation of risks and opportunities; (ii) enthusiast, mostly highlighting benefits to gain a competitive advantage; (iii) cautious, emphasizing risks and barriers to innovate; and (iv) futurist, a consideration of future technological necessities related to the increasing digitalization.

Suggested Citation

  • Pappas, Nikolaos & Caputo, Andrea & Pellegrini, Massimiliano Matteo & Marzi, Giacomo & Michopoulou, Eleni, 2021. "The complexity of decision-making processes and IoT adoption in accommodation SMEs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 573-583.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:131:y:2021:i:c:p:573-583
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296321000102
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dimitrios Buhalis & Aditya Amaranggana, 2015. "Smart Tourism Destinations Enhancing Tourism Experience Through Personalisation of Services," Springer Books, in: Iis Tussyadiah & Alessandro Inversini (ed.), Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2015, edition 127, pages 377-389, Springer.
    2. Wang, Yi-Shun & Li, Hsien-Ta & Li, Ci-Rong & Zhang, Ding-Zhong, 2016. "Factors affecting hotels' adoption of mobile reservation systems: A technology-organization-environment framework," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 163-172.
    3. Ragin, Charles C., 2000. "Fuzzy-Set Social Science," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, edition 1, number 9780226702773, September.
    4. Olya, Hossein G.T. & Altinay, Levent, 2016. "Asymmetric modeling of intention to purchase tourism weather insurance and loyalty," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2791-2800.
    5. Caputo, Andrea & Pizzi, Simone & Pellegrini, Massimiliano M. & Dabić, Marina, 2021. "Digitalization and business models: Where are we going? A science map of the field," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 489-501.
    6. Kim, Jong-Hyeong, 2014. "The antecedents of memorable tourism experiences: The development of a scale to measure the destination attributes associated with memorable experiences," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 34-45.
    7. Woodside, Arch G., 2014. "Embrace•perform•model: Complexity theory, contrarian case analysis, and multiple realities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(12), pages 2495-2503.
    8. Skarmeas, Dionysis & Leonidou, Constantinos N. & Saridakis, Charalampos, 2014. "Examining the role of CSR skepticism using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(9), pages 1796-1805.
    9. Saarikko, Ted & Westergren, Ulrika H. & Blomquist, Tomas, 2017. "The Internet of Things: Are you ready for what’s coming?," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 60(5), pages 667-676.
    10. Kamble, Sachin S. & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Parekh, Harsh & Joshi, Sudhanshu, 2019. "Modeling the internet of things adoption barriers in food retail supply chains," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 154-168.
    11. Kyle C. Longest & Stephen Vaisey, 2008. "fuzzy: A program for performing qualitative comparative analyses (QCA) in Stata," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 8(1), pages 79-104, February.
    12. Wu, Pei-Ling & Yeh, Shih-Shuo & Huan, Tzung-Cheng (.T.C.). & Woodside, Arch G., 2014. "Applying complexity theory to deepen service dominant logic: Configural analysis of customer experience-and-outcome assessments of professional services for personal transformations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(8), pages 1647-1670.
    13. David Levy, 1994. "Chaos theory and strategy: Theory, application, and managerial implications," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(S2), pages 167-178, June.
    14. Bogicevic, Vanja & Bujisic, Milos & Bilgihan, Anil & Yang, Wan & Cobanoglu, Cihan, 2017. "The impact of traveler-focused airport technology on traveler satisfaction," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 351-361.
    15. repec:ucp:bkecon:9780226702766 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Olmedo, Elena, 2011. "Is there chaos in the Spanish labour market?," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 44(12), pages 1045-1053.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liang, Yongheng & Xu, Qian & Jin, Liyin, 2021. "The effect of smart and connected products on consumer brand choice concentration," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 163-172.
    2. Pappas, Nikolaos, 2023. "Came and gone? A longitudinal study of the effects of COVID-19 on tourism purchasing intentions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    3. Savvas Papagiannidis & Dinara Davlembayeva, 2022. "Bringing Smart Home Technology to Peer-to-Peer Accommodation: Exploring the Drivers of Intention to Stay in Smart Accommodation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1189-1208, August.
    4. Salem Ahmed Alabdali & Salvatore Flavio Pileggi & Dilek Cetindamar, 2023. "Influential Factors, Enablers, and Barriers to Adopting Smart Technology in Rural Regions: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-38, May.
    5. Alok Raj & Anand Jeyaraj, 2023. "Antecedents and consequents of industry 4.0 adoption using technology, organization and environment (TOE) framework: A meta-analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 322(1), pages 101-124, March.
    6. Gladys Maquera & Bruno B. F. da Costa & Óscar Mendoza & Raúl A. Salinas & Assed N. Haddad, 2022. "Intelligent Digital Platform for Community-Based Rural Tourism—A Novel Concept Development in Peru," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, June.
    7. Daniela Roxana Vuță & Eliza Nichifor & Ioana Bianca Chițu & Gabriel Brătucu, 2022. "Digital Transformation—Top Priority in Difficult Times: The Case Study of Romanian Micro-Enterprises and SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-14, August.
    8. Chen, Chen-Tung & Chiu, Yen-Ting, 2021. "A study of dynamic fuzzy cognitive map model with group consensus based on linguistic variables," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    9. Rokonuzzaman, Md & Kim, Kyoungmi (Kate) & Dugar, Kranti Kumar & Fox, Jennine, 2022. "What makes an object smart? Conceptualization, development, and validation of a scale to measure the Smartness of a Thing (SoT)," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 337-354.
    10. Liao, Zhixue & Zheng, Weimin & Lin, Zhibin, 2022. "Time apart while together: A smart trip design for group travelers," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    11. Jang, Hyunmi & Haddoud, Mohamed Yacine & Roh, Saeyeon & Onjewu, Adah-Kole Emmanuel & Choi, Taeeun, 2023. "Implementing smart factory: A fuzzy-set analysis to uncover successful paths," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    12. Marzi, Giacomo & Fakhar Manesh, Mohammad & Caputo, Andrea & Pellegrini, Massimiliano Matteo & Vlačić, Božidar, 2023. "Do or do not. Cognitive configurations affecting open innovation adoption in SMEs," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    13. Andrea Caputo & Elisa Schiocchet & Ciro Troise, 2022. "Sustainable business models as successful drivers in equity crowdfunding," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3509-3522, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pappas, Nikolaos & Papatheodorou, Andreas, 2017. "Tourism and the refugee crisis in Greece: Perceptions and decision-making of accommodation providers," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 31-41.
    2. Pappas, Nikolaos, 2023. "Came and gone? A longitudinal study of the effects of COVID-19 on tourism purchasing intentions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    3. Beykan Çizel & İsmail Gökay Kırtıl & Volkan Aşkun & Edina Ajanovic & Hatice Karakaş, 2022. "Symmetric and asymmetric analysis of tourist behavioral intention's antecedents," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(6), pages 4599-4622, December.
    4. Russo, Ivan & Confente, Ilenia & Gligor, David M. & Autry, Chad W., 2016. "To be or not to be (loyal): Is there a recipe for customer loyalty in the B2B context?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 888-896.
    5. Xue, Jinjie & Yuan, Hongping & Shi, Benshan, 2016. "Investigating partners' opportunistic behavior in joint ventures in China: The role of transaction costs and relational exchanges," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 6067-6078.
    6. Carmen González-Velasco & Marcos González-Fernández & José-Luis Fanjul-Suárez, 2019. "Does innovative effort matter for corporate performance in Spanish companies in a context of financial crisis? A fuzzy-set QCA approach," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 56(5), pages 1707-1727, May.
    7. Romero-Castro, Noelia & Piñeiro-Chousa, Juan & Pérez-Pico, Ada, 2021. "Dealing with heterogeneity and complexity in the analysis of the willingness to invest in community renewable energy in rural areas," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    8. Sascha Kraus & Domingo Ribeiro-Soriano & Miriam Schüssler, 2018. "Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in entrepreneurship and innovation research – the rise of a method," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 15-33, March.
    9. Hervas-Oliver, Jose-Luis & Sempere-Ripoll, Francisca & Arribas, Ivan, 2015. "Asymmetric modeling of organizational innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(12), pages 2654-2662.
    10. Fotiadis, Anestis & Yeh, Shih-Shuo & Huan, Tzung-Cheng T.C., 2016. "Applying configural analysis to explaining rural-tourism success recipes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(4), pages 1479-1483.
    11. Díaz-Fernández, M. Carmen & González- Rodríguez, M. Rosario & Simonetti, Biagio, 2020. "Top management team diversity and high performance: An integrative approach based on upper echelons and complexity theory," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 157-168.
    12. Ren, Shengce & Tsai, Huei-Ting & Eisingerich, Andreas B., 2016. "Case-based asymmetric modeling of firms with high versus low outcomes in implementing changes in direction," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 500-507.
    13. Fotiadis, Anestis & Xie, Lishan & Li, Yaoqi & Huan, Tzung-Cheng T.C., 2016. "Attracting athletes to small-scale sports events using motivational decision-making factors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5467-5472.
    14. Ferguson, Graham & Megehee, Carol M. & Woodside, Arch G., 2017. "Culture, religiosity, and economic configural models explaining tipping-behavior prevalence across nations," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 218-233.
    15. Scarpi, Daniele & Pizzi, Gabriele & Raggiotto, Francesco & Mason, Michela, 2018. "A qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) of satisfaction toward extreme sporting Events," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 358-368.
    16. Olya, Hossein G.T. & Al-ansi, Amr, 2018. "Risk assessment of halal products and services: Implication for tourism industry," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 279-291.
    17. Mikalef, Patrick & Pateli, Adamantia, 2017. "Information technology-enabled dynamic capabilities and their indirect effect on competitive performance: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1-16.
    18. Veríssimo, José Manuel Cristóvão, 2018. "Usage intensity of mobile medical apps: A tale of two methods," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 442-447.
    19. Jiao, Jian-ling & Zhang, Xiao-lan & Tang, Yun-shu, 2020. "What factors determine the survival of green innovative enterprises in China? -- A method based on fsQCA," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    20. Stephan M. Liozu & Sven Feurer & Andreas Hinterhuber & Arch Woodside, 2021. "Configurational theory and practices of firms employing multiple pricing policies: assessing effective and ineffective pricing recipes in multiple firm contexts," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(4), pages 420-435, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:131:y:2021:i:c:p:573-583. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.