IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v63y2010i1p94-96.html

The integration-responsiveness framework and subsidiary management: A commentary

Author

Listed:
  • Haugland, Sven A.

Abstract

This commentary article discusses the appropriateness of using the integration-responsiveness framework for studying subsidiary management. The framework is frequently used and highly accepted in the international business literature, but the research contributions of applying the framework can be questioned. This commentary article discusses the applicability of the framework from a theoretical point of view, and furthermore, argues that it is difficult to empirically test subsidiary strategies and management based on hypotheses derived from the framework, and that the implications that can be drawn have limited theoretical content.

Suggested Citation

  • Haugland, Sven A., 2010. "The integration-responsiveness framework and subsidiary management: A commentary," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 94-96, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:63:y:2010:i:1:p:94-96
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148-2963(09)00057-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gabriel R. G. Benito, 2005. "Divestment and international business strategy," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 5(2), pages 235-251, April.
    2. Kendall Roth & Allen J Morrison, 1990. "An Empirical Analysis of the Integration-Responsiveness Framework in Global Industries," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 21(4), pages 541-564, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marc Philipp Schulze, 2021. "Of Bumping and Bending: Foreign Universities’ FDI Strategies in Malaysia," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 112(2), pages 179-194, April.
    2. Głodowska Agnieszka & Pera Bożena & Wach Krzysztof, 2019. "International Strategy as the Facilitator of the Speed, Scope, and Scale of Firms’ Internationalization," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 27(3), pages 55-84, September.
    3. Qu, Riliang & Zhang, Zelin, 2015. "Market orientation and business performance in MNC foreign subsidiaries— Moderating effects of integration and responsiveness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(5), pages 919-924.
    4. Banerjee, Shantanu & Venaik, Sunil & Brewer, Paul, 2019. "Analysing corporate political activity in MNC subsidiaries through the integration-responsiveness framework," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 1-1.
    5. Macro, Samantha & Ott, Ursula F., 2024. "The evolution of the ability to effectively innovate in a transnational organization – A configurational analysis," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(6).
    6. Ziyi Wei & Quyen T. K. Nguyen, 2020. "Local responsiveness strategy of foreign subsidiaries of Chinese multinationals: The impacts of relational-assets, market-seeking FDI, and host country institutional environments," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 661-692, September.
    7. Swoboda, Bernhard & Morbe, Lukas & Hirschmann, Johannes, 2018. "International strategy’s effects on retailers’ local implementation and performance," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 642-653.
    8. König, Andreas & Fehn, Angela & Puck, Jonas & Graf-Vlachy, Lorenz, 2017. "Primary or complex? Towards a theory of metaphorical strategy communication in MNCs," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 270-285.
    9. Nigel Martin Healey, 2018. "The Optimal Global Integration–Local Responsiveness Tradeoff for an International Branch Campus," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 59(5), pages 623-649, August.
    10. Williams, Christopher & Colovic, Ana & Zhu, Jiqing, 2017. "Integration-responsiveness, local hires and subsidiary performance amidst turbulence: Insights from a survey of Chinese subsidiaries," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 52(6), pages 842-853.
    11. Grøgaard, Birgitte, 2012. "Alignment of strategy and structure in international firms: An empirical examination," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 397-407.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chris Changwha Chung & Seung-Hyun Lee & Jeoung-Yul Lee, 2013. "Dual-Option Subsidiaries and Exit Decisions During Times of Economic Crisis," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 53(4), pages 555-577, August.
    2. Ziyi Wei & Quyen T. K. Nguyen, 2020. "Local responsiveness strategy of foreign subsidiaries of Chinese multinationals: The impacts of relational-assets, market-seeking FDI, and host country institutional environments," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 661-692, September.
    3. Julius H. Johnson, Jr. & Dinesh A. Mirchandani & Seng-Su Tsang, 2008. "Competitive Dynamics, Global Industry Cycles, Integration-Responsiveness, and Financial Performance in Emerging and Industrialized Country Markets," International Journal of Business and Economics, School of Management Development, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, vol. 7(1), pages 61-88, April.
    4. Sangcheol Song, 2014. "Subsidiary Divestment: The Role of Multinational Flexibility," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 47-70, February.
    5. Van Miller & John Quinn, 1993. "How green is the transnational corporation?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 2(1), pages 13-25, March.
    6. Changjun Yi & Xiaoyang Zhao & Ying Huang & Jie Yu & Jipeng Zhang, 2022. "Migration networks and subsidiary survival of EMNCs: The mediating effect of entry mode," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 2299-2310, September.
    7. Brian Rutherford, 2003. "Obfuscation, Textual Complexity and the Role of Regulated Narrative Accounting Disclosure in Corporate Governance," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 7(2), pages 187-210, June.
    8. Mauri, Alfredo J. & Lin, Jing & Neiva De Figueiredo, João, 2013. "The influence of strategic patterns of internationalization on the accuracy and bias of earnings forecasts by financial analysts," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 725-735.
    9. Burt, Steve & Coe, Neil M. & Davies, Keri, 2019. "A tactical retreat? Conceptualising the dynamics of European grocery retail divestment from East Asia," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 177-189.
    10. Fahy, John, 2002. "A resource-based analysis of sustainable competitive advantage in a global environment," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 57-77, February.
    11. Gillmore, Edward, 2022. "Mandate dynamics and the importance of mandate loss for subsidiary evolution," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(6).
    12. Laura Resmini & Giuseppe Vittucci Marzetti, 2020. "Home bias in divestment decisions of multinational corporations in the EU," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 799-813, August.
    13. Dirk Engel & Christoph M. Schmidt & Vivien Procher, 2010. "The Asymmetries of a Small World: Entry Into and Withdrawal From International Markets by French Firms," Ruhr Economic Papers 0192, Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universität Dortmund, Universität Duisburg-Essen.
    14. Jain, Subhash C. & Tucker, Lewis R., 1995. "The influence of culture on strategic constructs in the process of globalization: An empirical study of North American and Japanese MNCs," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 19-37, March.
    15. Irina Surdu & Kamel Mellahi & Keith Glaister & Giulio Nardella, 2017. "Why Wait? The Speed of Foreign Market Re-Entry after Initial Entry and Exit," John H Dunning Centre for International Business Discussion Papers jhd-dp2017-05, Henley Business School, University of Reading.
    16. Shyamala Sethuram & Ajai Gaur, 2024. "Foreign divestment: the missing piece in international business scholarship," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 55(8), pages 1038-1047, October.
    17. Johnson, William H.A. & Medcof, John W., 2007. "Motivating proactive subsidiary innovation: Agent-based theory and socialization models in global R&D," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 472-487, December.
    18. Getachew, Yamlaksira S. & Beamish, Paul W., 2021. "Unbundling the effects of host-country institutions on foreign subsidiary survival: A case for subsidiary heterogeneity," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 56(4).
    19. Gabriel R. G. Benito & Rajneesh Narula, 2007. "States and Firms on the Periphery: The Challenges of a Globalizing World," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Gabriel R. G. Benito & Rajneesh Narula (ed.), Multinationals on the Periphery, chapter 1, pages 1-24, Palgrave Macmillan.
    20. Filip De Beule, 2011. "Localization, Globalization and Networks of foreign Subsidiaries," Working Papers id:4500, eSocialSciences.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:63:y:2010:i:1:p:94-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.