IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v203y2026ics0148296325006307.html

Coalition formation and firm representatives’ answers to complainers on social media: Their interplay and the coalition ripple effect

Author

Listed:
  • Hosseinpour, Masoumeh
  • Roschk, Holger
  • Breitsohl, Jan

Abstract

We ask whether complaint answers by firm representatives depend on coalition formation—others taking sides with complainers or firm representatives—and whether coalition formation by third actors depends on complaint answers. An online field study revealed that, from the firm representative perspective, the 73.2 % probability of a complaint answer in the absence of any coalition decreases to 10.9 %–12.8 % in the presence of a prior coalition with a firm representative or complainer. From the third actor perspective, the probability of the formation of a coalition with a firm representative decreases by one-third in the presence versus absence of a prior complaint answer; coalitions with complainers are not curtailed. Furthermore, a coalition with a firm representative shifts the average complaint answer from somewhat favorable to unfavorable, which facilitates coalitions with complainers, creating a coalition ripple effect. The results offer managerial guidance, as dissatisfying online complaint handling remains problematic.

Suggested Citation

  • Hosseinpour, Masoumeh & Roschk, Holger & Breitsohl, Jan, 2026. "Coalition formation and firm representatives’ answers to complainers on social media: Their interplay and the coalition ripple effect," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:203:y:2026:i:c:s0148296325006307
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115807
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325006307
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115807?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mansur Khamitov & Yany Grégoire & Anshu Suri, 2020. "A systematic review of brand transgression, service failure recovery and product-harm crisis: integration and guiding insights," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 519-542, May.
    2. Joireman, Jeff & Karabas, Ismail & Munaganti, Pavan, 2024. "Customer backlash against pandemic Surcharges: The mediating role of inferred negative motives and implications for the “Surcharge Economy”," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    3. Bates, Douglas & Mächler, Martin & Bolker, Ben & Walker, Steve, 2015. "Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 67(i01).
    4. Bacile, Todd J. & Wolter, Jeremy S. & Allen, Alexis M. & Xu, Pei, 2018. "The Effects of Online Incivility and Consumer-to-Consumer Interactional Justice on Complainants, Observers, and Service Providers During Social Media Service Recovery," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 60-81.
    5. Lisa C Wan & Robert S WyerJr. & Vicki G Morwitz & Amna Kirmani & Valerie S Folkes, 2019. "The Influence of Incidental Similarity on Observers’ Causal Attributions and Reactions to a Service Failure," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 45(6), pages 1350-1368.
    6. Chen, Ke & Chen, Jianxun & Zhan, Wu & Sharma, Piyush, 2020. "When in Rome! Complaint contagion effect in multi-actor service ecosystems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 628-641.
    7. Liye Ma & Baohong Sun & Sunder Kekre, 2015. "The Squeaky Wheel Gets the Grease—An Empirical Analysis of Customer Voice and Firm Intervention on Twitter," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 627-645, September.
    8. Weitzl, Wolfgang & Hutzinger, Clemens, 2017. "The effects of marketer- and advocate-initiated online service recovery responses on silent bystanders," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 164-175.
    9. Sharma, Isha & Jain, Kokil & Behl, Abhishek, 2020. "Effect of service transgressions on distant third-party customers: The role of moral identity and moral judgment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 696-712.
    10. Hutzinger, Clemens & Weitzl, Wolfgang J., 2021. "Co-creation of online service recoveries and its effects on complaint bystanders," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 525-538.
    11. Kim, Kawon & Baker, Melissa A., 2020. "Paying it forward: The influence of other customer service recovery on future co-creation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 604-615.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Istanbulluoglu, Doga & Sakman, Ezgi, 2024. "Successful complaint handling on social media predicts increased repurchase intention: The roles of trust in company and propensity to trust," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 11-22.
    2. Sengupta, Sanchayan & Rokonuzzaman, Md & Kumar Jaiswal, Anand & Filieri, Raffaele, 2025. "Impact of virtual presence of others on social media service recovery evaluations: A cross-cultural perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    3. Béal, Mathieu & Suri, Anshu & Nguyen, Nguyen & Grégoire, Yany & Sénécal, Sylvain, 2022. "Is service recovery of equal importance for private vs public complainers?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 392-400.
    4. Nadine Schröder & Carsten D. Schultz & Friederike Paetz & Alicja Grzadziel & Melanie Clegg, 2025. "Unraveling the Influence: Exploring the Role of User Generated Content Along the Customer Journey and Understanding Its Relevance for Research and Practice," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 77(3), pages 457-496, September.
    5. Marius Johnen & Oliver Schnittka, 2019. "When pushing back is good: the effectiveness of brand responses to social media complaints," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(5), pages 858-878, September.
    6. Barbara Duffek & Andreas B. Eisingerich & Omar Merlo, 2023. "Why so toxic? A framework for exploring customer toxicity," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 13(1), pages 122-143, June.
    7. Sharma, Isha & Jain, Kokil & Behl, Abhishek, 2020. "Effect of service transgressions on distant third-party customers: The role of moral identity and moral judgment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 696-712.
    8. Bozkurt, Sıddık & Gligor, David, 2021. "Distinguishing between the impact of social media public and private compliments on customers’ future service recovery expectations," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    9. Gerrath, Maximilian H.E.E. & Brakus, J. Joško & Siamagka, Nikoletta Theofania & Christodoulides, George, 2023. "Avoiding the brand for me, us, or them? Consumer reactions to negative brand events," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    10. Saram Han & Christopher K. Anderson & Kyunghwa Chung, 2023. "Do managerial communications improve customer satisfaction and eWOM? The moderating effect of response authenticity," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    11. Huang, Ran & Ha, Sejin, 2020. "The effects of warmth-oriented and competence-oriented service recovery messages on observers on online platforms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 616-627.
    12. Septianto, Felix & Kwon, Junbum, 2022. "Too cute to be bad? Cute brand logo reduces consumer punishment following brand transgressions," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 1108-1126.
    13. Timea Marton & Jinglong Wang & Amaury Vaysse & Wei Yu & Pierre-Henri Commere & Quentin Holleville & Tristan Espie-Caullet & Richard Frock & Ludovic Deriano, 2025. "Polymerase theta repairs persistent G1-induced DNA breaks in S-phase during class switch recombination," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
    14. Schmidt, Christoph G. & Wuttke, David A. & Heese, H. Sebastian & Wagner, Stephan M., 2023. "Antecedents of public reactions to supply chain glitches," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    15. JANSSENS, Jochen & DE CORTE, Annelies & SÖRENSEN, Kenneth, 2016. "Water distribution network design optimisation with respect to reliability," Working Papers 2016007, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    16. Teruaki Kido & Yuko Yotsumoto & Masamichi J. Hayashi, 2025. "Hierarchical representations of relative numerical magnitudes in the human frontoparietal cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, December.
    17. Raymond Hernandez & Elizabeth A. Pyatak & Cheryl L. P. Vigen & Haomiao Jin & Stefan Schneider & Donna Spruijt-Metz & Shawn C. Roll, 2021. "Understanding Worker Well-Being Relative to High-Workload and Recovery Activities across a Whole Day: Pilot Testing an Ecological Momentary Assessment Technique," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-17, October.
    18. Christopher Hassall & Michael Nisbet & Evan Norcliffe & He Wang, 2024. "The Potential Health Benefits of Urban Tree Planting Suggested through Immersive Environments," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-12, February.
    19. Jie Zhao & Ji Chen & Damien Beillouin & Hans Lambers & Yadong Yang & Pete Smith & Zhaohai Zeng & Jørgen E. Olesen & Huadong Zang, 2022. "Global systematic review with meta-analysis reveals yield advantage of legume-based rotations and its drivers," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    20. Elisabeth Beckmann & Lukas Olbrich & Joseph Sakshaug, 2024. "Multivariate assessment of interviewer-related errors in a cross-national economic survey (Lukas Olbrich, Elisabeth Beckmann, Joseph W. Sakshaug)," Working Papers 253, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:203:y:2026:i:c:s0148296325006307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.