IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v168y2023ics0148296323005908.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managers’ dispositions toward formal contracts: A cross-country examination

Author

Listed:
  • Stefanidis, Abraham
  • Banai, Moshe
  • Newburry, William
  • Fainshmidt, Stav
  • Richter, Ulf Henning
  • Schinzel, Ursula
  • Kong, Yin
  • Erkus, Ahmet
  • Shakirova, Svetlana
  • Ozbek, Mehmet Ferhat
  • Goelzner, Herbert
  • Shetach, Ana
  • Sigri, Unsal

Abstract

This study integrates institutional and dispositional theories to develop a multilevel model predicting that managers’ endorsement of formal contracts increases with the quality of formal institutions. This effect is contingent upon managerial dispositions of ethical idealism and interpersonal trust, which provide a morally driven override of uncertainty and a substitute source of certainty in business practices, respectively. We test our arguments on hand-collected data from 3,652 manager-negotiators in 16 countries. We find that managers endorse formal contracts when they are embedded in contexts with high quality contract enforcement institutions, but this effect diminishes substantially among ethically idealistic managers. These results suggest that an understanding of managers’ reliance on formal contracts requires multilevel theory informed by how managerial dispositions interact with the formal institutional context.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefanidis, Abraham & Banai, Moshe & Newburry, William & Fainshmidt, Stav & Richter, Ulf Henning & Schinzel, Ursula & Kong, Yin & Erkus, Ahmet & Shakirova, Svetlana & Ozbek, Mehmet Ferhat & Goelzner, , 2023. "Managers’ dispositions toward formal contracts: A cross-country examination," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:168:y:2023:i:c:s0148296323005908
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114231
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296323005908
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114231?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:168:y:2023:i:c:s0148296323005908. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.