IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v104y2019icp261-270.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does leader turnover intention hinder team innovation performance? The roles of leader self-sacrificial behavior and empathic concern

Author

Listed:
  • Jiang, Wan
  • Wang, Linlin
  • Chu, Zhaofang
  • Zheng, Chundong

Abstract

This study examined how and when leader turnover intention influences team innovation performance. By integrating the literature on turnover intention and team innovation, and treating leader self-sacrificial behavior as a mediator, we explored the relationship between leader turnover intention and team innovation performance. Further, we examined leader empathic concern as a moderator of the relationship. We conducted a multiple-source, time-lagged research design to collect data from 119 team leaders and 397 team members of a large biopharmaceutical company in Northern China. We found that leader turnover intention is negatively related to leader self-sacrificial behavior, and leader empathic concern negatively moderated this relationship. In addition, leader self-sacrificial behavior served as a mediator in the negative relationship between leader turnover intention and team innovation performance. We discuss the implications of our findings for future theory, research, and practice regarding turnover and innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiang, Wan & Wang, Linlin & Chu, Zhaofang & Zheng, Chundong, 2019. "Does leader turnover intention hinder team innovation performance? The roles of leader self-sacrificial behavior and empathic concern," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 261-270.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:104:y:2019:i:c:p:261-270
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296319304308
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. He, Wei & Zhou, Ru-Yi & Long, Li-Rong & Huang, Xu & Hao, Po, 2018. "Self-Sacrificial Leadership and Followers’ Affiliative and Challenging Citizenship Behaviors: A Relational Self-Concept Based Study in China," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(1), pages 105-133, March.
    2. Yoshida, Diah Tuhfat & Sendjaya, Sen & Hirst, Giles & Cooper, Brian, 2014. "Does servant leadership foster creativity and innovation? A multi-level mediation study of identification and prototypicality," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(7), pages 1395-1404.
    3. Huang, Lei & Krasikova, Dina V. & Liu, Dong, 2016. "I can do it, so can you: The role of leader creative self-efficacy in facilitating follower creativity," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 49-62.
    4. Laetitia Mulder & Rob Nelissen, 2010. "When Rules Really Make a Difference: The Effect of Cooperation Rules and Self-Sacrificing Leadership on Moral Norms in Social Dilemmas," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 95(1), pages 57-72, September.
    5. Cremer, David De & Knippenberg, Daan van, 2004. "Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness: The moderating role of leader self-confidence," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 140-155, November.
    6. Brown, Michael E. & Trevino, Linda K. & Harrison, David A., 2005. "Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 117-134, July.
    7. Vincent Rousseau & Caroline Aubé, 2018. "When Leaders Stifle Innovation in Work Teams: The Role of Abusive Supervision," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(3), pages 651-664, September.
    8. Chen, Chung-Jen & Huang, Jing-Wen, 2009. "Strategic human resource practices and innovation performance -- The mediating role of knowledge management capacity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 104-114, January.
    9. Mayowa T. Babalola & Jeroen Stouten & Martin Euwema, 2016. "Frequent Change and Turnover Intention: The Moderating Role of Ethical Leadership," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 134(2), pages 311-322, March.
    10. Forrester, Rosalind H., 2000. "Capturing Learning and Applying Knowledge: An Investigation of the Use of Innovation Teams in Japanese and American Automotive Firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 35-45, January.
    11. Liu, Haiyang & Chiang, Jack Ting-Ju & Fehr, Ryan & Xu, Minya & Wang, Siting, 2017. "How do leaders react when treated unfairly? Leader narcissism and self-interested behavior in response to unfair treatment," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 88208, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rieger, Verena & Klarmann, Martin, 2022. "The effect of cooperative team culture on innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1256-1271.
    2. Stefano Ruggieri & Melissa Gagliano & Rocco Servidio & Ugo Pace & Alessia Passanisi, 2023. "The Effects of Leader Self-Sacrifice in Virtual Teams on Prosocial Behavior: The Mediational Role of Team Identification and Self-Efficacy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-13, March.
    3. Ahmet Cengiz Ucar & Lutfihak Alpkan & Meral Elci, 2021. "The Effects of Person–Organization Fit and Turnover Intention on Employees’ Creative Behavior: The Mediating Role of Psychological Ownership," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, December.
    4. Sirén, Charlotta & Parida, Vinit & Frishammar, Johan & Wincent, Joakim, 2020. "Time and time-based organizing of innovation: Influence of temporality on entrepreneurial firms’ performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 23-32.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yiying Qu & Zhenting Xu & Hong Sun & Qingsheng Li, 2022. "The Effect of Self-Sacrificial Leadership on Employees’ Organisational Citizenship Behaviour for the Environment: A Moderated Mediation Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Vincent Giolito, 2015. "Toward a unified "Theory Y" of leadership: Leader self-awareness, ethics and integrity as key attributes of positive leadership," Working Papers CEB 15-043, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    3. Muhammad Azeem Qureshi & Abdur Rahman Aleemi & Syed Irfan Hyder, 2019. "Servant Leadership: A Taxonomic Approach Towards Systematic Literature Review," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 15(1), pages 219-230.
    4. Zhiyu Feng & Fong Keng-Highberger & Kai Chi Yam & Xiao-Ping Chen & Hu Li, 2023. "Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing: How and When Machiavellian Leaders Demonstrate Strategic Abuse," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 255-280, April.
    5. Sreedhar Madhavaram & Andrew C. Gross & Radha Appan, 2014. "Knowledge needs of firms: the know-x framework for marketing strategy," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 4(3), pages 63-77, December.
    6. Matthew J. Quade & Sara J. Perry & Emily M. Hunter, 2019. "Boundary Conditions of Ethical Leadership: Exploring Supervisor-Induced and Job Hindrance Stress as Potential Inhibitors," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(4), pages 1165-1184, September.
    7. Wei Su & Juhee Hahn, 2021. "Improving Millennial Employees’ OCB: A Multilevel Mediated and Moderated Model of Ethical Leadership," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-17, July.
    8. Jian Peng & Zhen Wang & Xiao Chen, 2019. "Does Self-Serving Leadership Hinder Team Creativity? A Moderated Dual-Path Model," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(2), pages 419-433, October.
    9. Eva, Nathan & Sendjaya, Sen & Prajogo, Daniel & Madison, Karryna, 2021. "Does organizational structure render leadership unnecessary? Configurations of formalization and centralization as a substitute and neutralizer of servant leadership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 43-56.
    10. Fengjun Liu & Lu Meng & Yijun Zhao & Shen Duan, 2020. "The influence of the corporate social responsibility disclosures on consumer brand attitudes under the impact of COVID-19," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-22, December.
    11. Muhammad Azeem Qureshi & Abdur Rahman Aleemi & Syed Irfan Hyder, 2019. "Servant Leadership: A Taxonomic Approach Towards Systematic Literature Review," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 15(1), pages 15-18.
    12. Rahul Raj & Kailash B.L. Srivastava, 2013. "The Mediating Role of Organizational Learning on the Relationship among Organizational Culture, HRM Practices and Innovativeness," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 38(3), pages 201-223, August.
    13. Liu, Dong & Jiang, Kaifeng & Shalley, Christina E. & Keem, Sejin & Zhou, Jing, 2016. "Motivational mechanisms of employee creativity: A meta-analytic examination and theoretical extension of the creativity literature," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 236-263.
    14. Kamran Iqbal & Muhammad Naveed & Qazi Abdul Subhan & Tehreem Fatima & Saeed T. Alshahrani, 2022. "When Self-Sacrificial Leaders Induce Employees’ Citizenship Behaviors? Uncovering the Nexus of Psychological Empowerment and Psychological Well-Being," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    15. Stijn Decoster & Jeroen Stouten & Thomas M. Tripp, 2021. "When Employees Retaliate Against Self-Serving Leaders: The Influence of the Ethical Climate," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(1), pages 195-213, January.
    16. Yuming Wang & Wenan Hu & Zhaopeng Liu & Jinlian Luo, 2023. "My Family Accounts Much for Me: How Does Work-to-Family Conflict Lead to Unethical Pro-Family Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-20, February.
    17. An-Chih Wang & Jack Ting-Ju Chiang & Wan-Ju Chou & Bor-Shiuan Cheng, 2017. "One definition, different manifestations: Investigating ethical leadership in the Chinese context," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 505-535, September.
    18. Chikelu Okey Felix & Rosita Bint Arshad, 2015. "Examining Moral Reasoning and Transactional Leadership behaviour in the Nigerian Public Sector," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 7(3), pages 110-118.
    19. Thuy-Van Tran & Sinikka Lepistö & Janne Järvinen, 2021. "The relationship between subjectivity in managerial performance evaluation and the three dimensions of justice perception," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 369-399, September.
    20. Xin Liu & Lin Zhang & Abhinav Gupta & Xiaoming Zheng & Changqi Wu, 2022. "Upper echelons and intra‐organizational learning: How executive narcissism affects knowledge transfer among business units," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(11), pages 2351-2381, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:104:y:2019:i:c:p:261-270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.