IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/intfin/v100y2025ics104244312500023x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ESG ratings: Disagreement across providers and effects on stock returns

Author

Listed:
  • Anselmi, Giulio
  • Petrella, Giovanni

Abstract

This paper examines the ESG ratings assigned by two providers, LSEG and Bloomberg, to companies listed in Europe and the United States from 2010 to 2020. The objective is to document the path of the ESG ratings over time, the divergence of opinions across providers, and whether the ESG dimension affects stock returns. The ESG scores have increased significantly over time, both in Europe and the United States, andhigher scores are common for larger firms with low credit risk and lower equity returns. Once risk factors have been considered, the ESG dimension does not affect stock returns. The divergence of opinions across rating providers is vast and mainly increasing, especially in the US and for the social component. A wide divergence of opinions on the ESG score does not favour the correct pricing of the ESG risks and weakens the link between investors’ ESG preferences and the performance of stocks with better ESG metrics. However, disagreement across providers should not be considered only negatively as it can enrich the information set and avoid rating over-reliance (which proved to be a vital issue in the 2007–2009 financial crisis).

Suggested Citation

  • Anselmi, Giulio & Petrella, Giovanni, 2025. "ESG ratings: Disagreement across providers and effects on stock returns," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:intfin:v:100:y:2025:i:c:s104244312500023x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.intfin.2025.102133
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S104244312500023X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.intfin.2025.102133?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:intfin:v:100:y:2025:i:c:s104244312500023x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/intfin .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.