IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/insuma/v122y2025icp275-299.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Equilibrium intergenerational risk-sharing design for a target benefit pension plan

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Lv
  • Li, Danping
  • Wang, Yumin
  • Zhu, Xiaobai

Abstract

In this paper, we develop a risk-sharing pension design for a target benefit pension plan to minimize the income instability for all future retirees within a Black-Scholes market setting and a stable population. In contrast to the existing literature, we explicitly consider the difference between individual and intergenerational discount functions. This distinction, motivated by the fact that individual time preferences and societal preferences for different generations are fundamentally different, leads to time-inconsistent preferences for pension sponsors. By using the benefit structure as a control variable and solving a system of extended Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations, we derive an intergenerational Nash equilibrium design that implicitly balances the benefit-risk across different generations. Compared to several conventional designs, we find that the equilibrium design is more robust to the choices of generational weights and time preferences. Consequently, it fosters stronger intergenerational solidarity in the risk-sharing structure, enhancing the stability and continuity of the pension plan. Additional sensitivity tests, including different individual and generational discount functions as well as dynamic investment strategies, are performed.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Lv & Li, Danping & Wang, Yumin & Zhu, Xiaobai, 2025. "Equilibrium intergenerational risk-sharing design for a target benefit pension plan," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 275-299.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:122:y:2025:i:c:p:275-299
    DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2025.03.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167668725000459
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2025.03.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tangren Feng & Shaowei Ke, 2018. "Social Discounting and Intergenerational Pareto," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 86(5), pages 1537-1567, September.
    2. Yao, Rui & Sharpe, Deanna L. & Wang, Feifei, 2011. "Decomposing the age effect on risk tolerance," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 879-887.
    3. Josa-Fombellida, Ricardo & Rincón-Zapatero, Juan Pablo, 2019. "Equilibrium strategies in a defined benefit pension plan game," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(1), pages 374-386.
    4. Qian Zhao & Rongming Wang & Jiaqin Wei, 2016. "Minimization of risks in defined benefit pension plan with time‐inconsistent preferences," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(2), pages 243-258, March.
    5. Chen, Ping & Yao, Haixiang & Yang, Hailiang & Zhu, Dan, 2023. "Target benefit versus defined contribution scheme: a multi-period framework," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(3), pages 545-579, September.
    6. Rong, Ximin & Tao, Cheng & Zhao, Hui, 2023. "Target benefit pension plan with longevity risk and intergenerational equity – CORRIGENDUM," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(2), pages 488-488, May.
    7. Jan Bonenkamp & Ed Westerhout, 2014. "Intergenerational Risk Sharing and Endogenous Labour Supply within Funded Pension Schemes," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 81(323), pages 566-592, July.
    8. Simone Galperti & Bruno Strulovici, 2017. "A Theory of Intergenerational Altruism," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 85, pages 1175-1218, July.
    9. Marín-Solano, Jesús & Navas, Jorge, 2010. "Consumption and portfolio rules for time-inconsistent investors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(3), pages 860-872, March.
    10. Emmanuel Farhi & Iván Werning, 2007. "Inequality and Social Discounting," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 115(3), pages 365-402.
    11. Sun, Jingyun & Li, Zhongfei & Zeng, Yan, 2016. "Precommitment and equilibrium investment strategies for defined contribution pension plans under a jump–diffusion model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 158-172.
    12. Piacquadio, Paolo G., 2020. "The ethics of intergenerational risk," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    13. Zhu, Xiaobai & Hardy, Mary & Saunders, David, 2021. "Fair Transition From Defined Benefit To Target Benefit," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 51(3), pages 873-904, September.
    14. Gordon, Roger H. & Varian, Hal R., 1988. "Intergenerational risk sharing," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 185-202, November.
    15. Chen, An & Nguyen, Thai & Rach, Manuel, 2021. "Optimal collective investment: The impact of sharing rules, management fees and guarantees," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    16. Beetsma, Roel M.W.J. & Romp, Ward E. & Vos, Siert J., 2012. "Voluntary participation and intergenerational risk sharing in a funded pension system," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 1310-1324.
    17. Peter A. Forsyth & Kenneth R. Vetzal, 2019. "Optimal Asset Allocation for Retirement Saving: Deterministic Vs. Time Consistent Adaptive Strategies," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 1-37, January.
    18. Brooks, Chris & Sangiorgi, Ivan & Hillenbrand, Carola & Money, Kevin, 2018. "Why are older investors less willing to take financial risks?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 52-72.
    19. Andrew Caplin & John Leahy, 2004. "The Social Discount Rate," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 112(6), pages 1257-1268, December.
    20. Schumacher, Johannes M., 2021. "A note on Gollier's model for a collective pension scheme," Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(2), pages 187-211, April.
    21. Ebert, Sebastian & Wei, Wei & Zhou, Xun Yu, 2020. "Weighted discounting—On group diversity, time-inconsistency, and consequences for investment," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    22. Merton, Robert C, 1969. "Lifetime Portfolio Selection under Uncertainty: The Continuous-Time Case," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 51(3), pages 247-257, August.
    23. Chen, Damiaan H.J. & Beetsma, Roel M.W.J. & Broeders, Dirk W.G.A. & Pelsser, Antoon A.J., 2017. "Sustainability of participation in collective pension schemes: An option pricing approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 182-196.
    24. Josa-Fombellida, Ricardo & Navas, Jorge, 2020. "Time consistent pension funding in a defined benefit pension plan with non-constant discounting," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 142-153.
    25. Josa-Fombellida, Ricardo & López-Casado, Paula & Navas, Jorge, 2023. "A defined benefit pension plan model with stochastic salary and heterogeneous discounting," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(1), pages 62-83, January.
    26. Gollier, Christian, 2008. "Intergenerational risk-sharing and risk-taking of a pension fund," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(5-6), pages 1463-1485, June.
    27. Zhao, Hui & Wang, Suxin, 2022. "Optimal investment and benefit adjustment problem for a target benefit pension plan with Cobb-Douglas utility and Epstein-Zin recursive utility," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(3), pages 1166-1180.
    28. Cui, Jiajia & Jong, Frank De & Ponds, Eduard, 2011. "Intergenerational risk sharing within funded pension schemes," Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(1), pages 1-29, January.
    29. Liu, Bo & Lu, Lei & Mu, Congming & Yang, Jinqiang, 2016. "Time-inconsistent preferences, investment and asset pricing," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 48-52.
    30. Rong, Ximin & Tao, Cheng & Zhao, Hui, 2023. "Target benefit pension plan with longevity risk and intergenerational equity," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(1), pages 84-103, January.
    31. He, Lin & Liang, Zongxia & Wang, Sheng, 2022. "Dynamic optimal adjustment policies of hybrid pension plans," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 46-68.
    32. Morin, Roger A & Fernandez Suarez, Antonio, 1983. "Risk Aversion Revisited," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 38(4), pages 1201-1216, September.
    33. Wang, Suxin & Lu, Yi & Sanders, Barbara, 2018. "Optimal investment strategies and intergenerational risk sharing for target benefit pension plans," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1-14.
    34. Tomas Björk & Mariana Khapko & Agatha Murgoci, 2017. "On time-inconsistent stochastic control in continuous time," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 331-360, April.
    35. Wang, Suxin & Rong, Ximin & Zhao, Hui, 2019. "Optimal investment and benefit payment strategy under loss aversion for target benefit pension plans," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 346(C), pages 205-218.
    36. Xiaobai Zhu & Mary Hardy & David Saunders, 2021. "Structure of intergenerational risk-sharing plans: optimality and fairness," Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2021(7), pages 543-571, August.
    37. Stefan Graf, 2017. "Life-cycle funds: Much Ado about Nothing?," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(11), pages 974-998, September.
    38. Bian, Lihua & Li, Zhongfei & Yao, Haixiang, 2018. "Pre-commitment and equilibrium investment strategies for the DC pension plan with regime switching and a return of premiums clause," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 78-94.
    39. Michael A. Grubb & Agnieszka Tymula & Sharon Gilaie-Dotan & Paul W. Glimcher & Ifat Levy, 2016. "Neuroanatomy accounts for age-related changes in risk preferences," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 1-5, December.
    40. Boonen, Tim J. & De Waegenaere, Anja, 2017. "Intergenerational risk sharing in closing pension funds," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 20-30.
    41. Chen, Lv & Li, Danping & Wang, Yumin & Zhu, Xiaobai, 2024. "Optimal VIX-linked structure for the target benefit pension plan," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 54(1), pages 75-93, January.
    42. Chen, Lv & Li, Danping & Wang, Yumin & Zhu, Xiaobai, 2023. "The optimal cyclical design for a target benefit pension plan," Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(3), pages 284-303, July.
    43. Bakshi, Gurdip S & Chen, Zhiwu, 1994. "Baby Boom, Population Aging, and Capital Markets," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 67(2), pages 165-202, April.
    44. Shigeta, Yuki, 2022. "Quasi-hyperbolic discounting under recursive utility and consumption–investment decisions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    45. David Blanchett & Michael Finke & Michael Guillemette, 2018. "The Effect of Advanced Age and Equity Values on Risk Preferences," Journal of Behavioral Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 434-441, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bégin, Jean-François, 2020. "Levelling the playing field: A VIX-linked structure for funded pension schemes," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 58-78.
    2. Zhao, Hui & Wang, Suxin, 2022. "Optimal investment and benefit adjustment problem for a target benefit pension plan with Cobb-Douglas utility and Epstein-Zin recursive utility," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(3), pages 1166-1180.
    3. Zhang, Jiannan & Chen, Ping & Jin, Zhuo & Li, Shuanming, 2025. "Optimal strategies for collective defined contribution plans when the stock and labor markets are co-integrated," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 490(C).
    4. Boonen, Tim J. & De Waegenaere, Anja, 2017. "Intergenerational risk sharing in closing pension funds," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 20-30.
    5. Josa-Fombellida, Ricardo & López-Casado, Paula, 2025. "Optimal investment and benefit strategies for a target benefit pension plan where the risky assets are jump diffusion processes," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 100-110.
    6. Wang, Suxin & Lu, Yi, 2019. "Optimal investment strategies and risk-sharing arrangements for a hybrid pension plan," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 46-62.
    7. Ed Westerhout & Jan Bonenkamp & Peter Broer, 2014. "Collective versus Individual Pension Schemes: a Welfare-Theoretical Perspective," CPB Discussion Paper 287, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    8. Alserda, G.A.G. & Steenbeek, O.W. & van der Lecq, S.G., 2017. "The Occurrence and Impact of Pension Fund Discontinuity," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2017-008-F&A, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    9. Chen, Damiaan H. J. & Beetsma, Roel M. W. J. & Ponds, Eduard H. M. & Romp, Ward E., 2016. "Intergenerational risk-sharing through funded pensions and public debt," Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(2), pages 127-159, April.
    10. Chen, Damiaan H.J. & Beetsma, Roel M.W.J. & van Wijnbergen, Sweder J.G., 2023. "Intergenerational sharing of unhedgeable inflation risk," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 140-160.
    11. Chen, Damiaan H.J. & Beetsma, Roel M.W.J. & Broeders, Dirk W.G.A. & Pelsser, Antoon A.J., 2017. "Sustainability of participation in collective pension schemes: An option pricing approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 182-196.
    12. Mehlkopf, R.J., 2011. "Risk sharing with the unborn," Other publications TiSEM fe8a8df6-455f-4624-af10-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    13. Tao, Cheng & Rong, Ximin & Zhao, Hui, 2025. "Target benefit pension with longevity risk and stochastic interest rate valuation," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 285-301.
    14. Damiaan Chen & Roel Beetsma & Dirk Broeders, 2015. "Stability of participation in collective pension schemes: An option pricing approach," DNB Working Papers 484, Netherlands Central Bank, Research Department.
    15. Romp, Ward & Beetsma, Roel, 2020. "Sustainability of pension systems with voluntary participation," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 125-140.
    16. Yushi Hamaguchi & Alex S. L. Tse, 2024. "Periodic portfolio selection with quasi-hyperbolic discounting," Papers 2410.18240, arXiv.org.
    17. Andreas Lichtenstern & Pavel V. Shevchenko & Rudi Zagst, 2019. "Optimal life-cycle consumption and investment decisions under age-dependent risk preferences," Papers 1908.09976, arXiv.org.
    18. Wang, Suxin & Lu, Yi & Sanders, Barbara, 2018. "Optimal investment strategies and intergenerational risk sharing for target benefit pension plans," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1-14.
    19. Xue Dong He & Xun Yu Zhou, 2021. "Who Are I: Time Inconsistency and Intrapersonal Conflict and Reconciliation," Papers 2105.01829, arXiv.org.
    20. Dong-Xuan, Bach & Qu, Xiangyu, 2025. "Restricted dominant unanimity and social discounting," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G52 - Financial Economics - - Household Finance - - - Insurance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:122:y:2025:i:c:p:275-299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505554 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.