IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finlet/v78y2025ics1544612325003897.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can AI beat a naive portfolio? An experiment with anonymized data

Author

Listed:
  • Perlin, Marcelo S.
  • Foguesatto, Cristian R.
  • Müller, Fernanda M.
  • Righi, Marcelo B.

Abstract

Using anonymized data from the United States (U.S.) market, we evaluate the performance of Google’s main LLM (Large Language Model) Gemini 1.5 Flash in making investment decisions. Unlike other studies, we query the LLM for different investment horizons (1 to 36 months) and types of financial information (financial data, price data, and a combination of both). Running a total of 30,000 simulations for 1,522 companies over 20 years of data, we find that Gemini does not consistently outperform a naive portfolio and the S&P 500 index in terms of returns and Sharpe ratios. Additionally, our findings indicate a decline in risk adjusted investment performance as the investment horizon extends.

Suggested Citation

  • Perlin, Marcelo S. & Foguesatto, Cristian R. & Müller, Fernanda M. & Righi, Marcelo B., 2025. "Can AI beat a naive portfolio? An experiment with anonymized data," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:78:y:2025:i:c:s1544612325003897
    DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2025.107126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612325003897
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107126?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaoyang Li & Haoming Feng & Hailong Yang & Jiyuan Huang, 2024. "Can ChatGPT reduce human financial analysts’ optimistic biases?," Economic and Political Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 20-33, January.
    2. Victor DeMiguel & Lorenzo Garlappi & Raman Uppal, 2009. "Optimal Versus Naive Diversification: How Inefficient is the 1-N Portfolio Strategy?," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 22(5), pages 1915-1953, May.
    3. Ma, Feng & Lyu, Zhichong & Li, Haibo, 2024. "Can ChatGPT predict Chinese equity premiums?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    4. repec:osf:osfxxx:ahkd3_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Pelster, Matthias & Val, Joel, 2024. "Can ChatGPT assist in picking stocks?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    6. Oleksandr Romanko & Akhilesh Narayan & Roy H. Kwon, 2023. "ChatGPT-Based Investment Portfolio Selection," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 1-27, December.
    7. Kirtac, Kemal & Germano, Guido, 2024. "Sentiment trading with large language models," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PB).
    8. Chang, Victor & Hahm, Nattareya & Xu, Qianwen Ariel & Vijayakumar, P. & Liu, Ling, 2024. "Towards data and analytics driven B2B-banking for green finance: A cross-selling use case study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    9. Ko, Hyungjin & Lee, Jaewook, 2024. "Can ChatGPT improve investment decisions? From a portfolio management perspective," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    10. Lee, Heungmin, 2025. "Unleashing the Potential of Large Language Models in the Finance Industry," OSF Preprints ahkd3, Center for Open Science.
    11. Oleksandr Romanko & Akhilesh Narayan & Roy H. Kwon, 2023. "ChatGPT-based Investment Portfolio Selection," Papers 2308.06260, arXiv.org.
    12. Brenner, Lukas & Meyll, Tobias, 2020. "Robo-advisors: A substitute for human financial advice?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).
    13. Hongyang Yang & Xiao-Yang Liu & Christina Dan Wang, 2023. "FinGPT: Open-Source Financial Large Language Models," Papers 2306.06031, arXiv.org.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dong, Mengming Michael & Stratopoulos, Theophanis C. & Wang, Victor Xiaoqi, 2024. "A scoping review of ChatGPT research in accounting and finance," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    2. Dong, Mengming Michael & Stratopoulos, Theophanis C. & Wang, Victor Xiaoqi, 2024. "A scoping review of ChatGPT research in accounting and finance," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    3. Chiu, Ya-Ling & Gao, Xuechen & Liu, Hung-Chun & Zhai, Qiong, 2025. "Financial literacy of ChatGPT: Evidence through financial news," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    4. Wang, Qishu, 2025. "Generative AI-assisted evaluation of ESG practices and information delays in ESG ratings," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    5. Wang, Jying-Nan & Liu, Hung-Chun & Hsu, Yuan-Teng, 2025. "Do AI incidents and hazards matter for AI-themed cryptocurrency returns?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    6. Liu, Yingnan & Bu, Ningbo & Li, Zhiqiang & Zhang, Yongmin & Zhao, Zhenyu, 2025. "AT-FinGPT: Financial risk prediction via an audio-text large language model," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    7. Ko, Hyungjin & Lee, Jaewook, 2024. "Can ChatGPT improve investment decisions? From a portfolio management perspective," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    8. Yichen Luo & Yebo Feng & Jiahua Xu & Paolo Tasca & Yang Liu, 2025. "LLM-Powered Multi-Agent System for Automated Crypto Portfolio Management," Papers 2501.00826, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2025.
    9. Chiu, I-Chan & Hung, Mao-Wei, 2025. "Finance-specific large language models: Advancing sentiment analysis and return prediction with LLaMA 2," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    10. Lars Hornuf & David J. Streich & Niklas Töllich, 2025. "Making GenAI Smarter: Evidence from a Portfolio Allocation Experiment," CESifo Working Paper Series 11862, CESifo.
    11. Jang Ho Kim & Seyoung Kim & Yongjae Lee & Woo Chang Kim & Frank J. Fabozzi, 2025. "Enhancing mean–variance portfolio optimization through GANs-based anomaly detection," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 346(1), pages 217-244, March.
    12. Minh Tam Tammy Schlosky & Serkan Karadas & Sterling Raskie, 2024. "ChatGPT, Help! I Am in Financial Trouble," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-39, June.
    13. Kevin He & Ran Shorrer & Mengjia Xia, 2025. "Human Misperception of Generative-AI Alignment: A Laboratory Experiment," Papers 2502.14708, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2025.
    14. Isler, Ozan & Rojas, Andres & Dulleck, Uwe, 2022. "Easy to shove, difficult to show: Effect of educative and default nudges on financial self-management," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(C).
    15. Fan, Siyu & Wu, Yifei & Yang, Ruochen, 2025. "Measuring firm-level supply chain risk using a generative large language model," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    16. Rand Kwong Yew Low, 2018. "Vine copulas: modelling systemic risk and enhancing higher‐moment portfolio optimisation," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 58(S1), pages 423-463, November.
    17. Malavasi, Matteo & Ortobelli Lozza, Sergio & Trück, Stefan, 2021. "Second order of stochastic dominance efficiency vs mean variance efficiency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(3), pages 1192-1206.
    18. Candelon, B. & Hurlin, C. & Tokpavi, S., 2012. "Sampling error and double shrinkage estimation of minimum variance portfolios," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 511-527.
    19. Dindo, Pietro & Massari, Filippo, 2020. "The wisdom of the crowd in dynamic economies," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 15(4), November.
    20. Lauren Stagnol, 2015. "Designing a corporate bond index on solvency criteria," EconomiX Working Papers 2015-39, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G17 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Financial Forecasting and Simulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:78:y:2025:i:c:s1544612325003897. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/frl .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.