IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finlet/v66y2024ics154461232400638x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The AI revolution: are crypto markets more efficient after ChatGPT 3?

Author

Listed:
  • Almeida, José
  • Gonçalves, Tiago Cruz

Abstract

This study examines the efficiency of crypto markets in the context of the AI revolution, focusing on AI-Crypto sectors. By employing the Adjusted Market Inefficiency Magnitude (AMIM) and conducting quantile efficiency and liquidity analyses, we observe dynamic fluctuations in market efficiency across sectors like Generative AI, AI Big Data, Cybersecurity, and Distributed Computing. Our findings reveal that most AI-Crypto sectors present a tendency towards higher efficiency in extreme market conditions. The introduction of ChatGPT 3 significantly enhanced market efficiency, with sectors associated with AI experiencing positive mean returns and increased liquidity. Our results suggest that market efficiency in these sectors is not static but evolves with technological innovations and sector-specific characteristics, in that AI-related sectors are driving the recent market dynamics, with increased liquidity and efficiency observed post-ChatGPT 3 launch. This research extends previous work on crypto market efficiency and explores the incorporation of information in AI tokenized projects, underscoring the transformative impact of AI on the crypto market landscape.

Suggested Citation

  • Almeida, José & Gonçalves, Tiago Cruz, 2024. "The AI revolution: are crypto markets more efficient after ChatGPT 3?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:66:y:2024:i:c:s154461232400638x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2024.105608
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S154461232400638X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105608?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tiwari, Aviral Kumar & Jana, R.K. & Das, Debojyoti & Roubaud, David, 2018. "Informational efficiency of Bitcoin—An extension," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 106-109.
    2. Okoroafor, Ugochi Chibuzor & Leirvik, Thomas, 2022. "Time varying market efficiency in the Brent and WTI crude market," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    3. Alvarez-Ramirez, Jose & Rodriguez, Eduardo, 2021. "A singular value decomposition approach for testing the efficiency of Bitcoin and Ethereum markets," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    4. Saggu, Aman & Ante, Lennart, 2023. "The influence of ChatGPT on artificial intelligence related crypto assets: Evidence from a synthetic control analysis," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 55(PB).
    5. Urquhart, Andrew, 2016. "The inefficiency of Bitcoin," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 80-82.
    6. Amihud, Yakov, 2002. "Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 31-56, January.
    7. Tran, Vu Le & Leirvik, Thomas, 2019. "A simple but powerful measure of market efficiency," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 141-151.
    8. Wei, Wang Chun, 2018. "Liquidity and market efficiency in cryptocurrencies," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 21-24.
    9. Almeida, José & Gonçalves, Tiago Cruz, 2023. "A systematic literature review of investor behavior in the cryptocurrency markets," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    10. Brauneis, Alexander & Mestel, Roland, 2018. "Price discovery of cryptocurrencies: Bitcoin and beyond," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 58-61.
    11. Aslam, Faheem & Memon, Bilal Ahmed & Hunjra, Ahmed Imran & Bouri, Elie, 2023. "The dynamics of market efficiency of major cryptocurrencies," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Siddik, Abu Bakkar & Li, Yong & Du, Anna Min, 2024. "Unlocking funding success for generative AI startups: The crucial role of investor influence," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 69(PB).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aurelio F. Bariviera & Ignasi Merediz‐Solà, 2021. "Where Do We Stand In Cryptocurrencies Economic Research? A Survey Based On Hybrid Analysis," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(2), pages 377-407, April.
    2. Carmen López-Martín & Sonia Benito Muela & Raquel Arguedas, 2021. "Efficiency in cryptocurrency markets: new evidence," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(3), pages 403-431, September.
    3. Köchling, Gerrit & Müller, Janis & Posch, Peter N., 2019. "Price delay and market frictions in cryptocurrency markets," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 39-41.
    4. Shimeng Shi & Jia Zhai & Yingying Wu, 2024. "Informational inefficiency on bitcoin futures," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(6), pages 642-667, April.
    5. Nikolaos A. Kyriazis, 2019. "A Survey on Efficiency and Profitable Trading Opportunities in Cryptocurrency Markets," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, April.
    6. BEN ABDALLAH Mohamed & TALBI Omar, 2024. "A Wavelet Analysis of Bitcoin Price Volatility Dynamic," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(1), pages 951-964, January.
    7. Hyeonoh Kim & Eojin Yi & Jooyoung Jeon & Taeyoung Park & Kwangwon Ahn, 2024. "After the Split: Market Efficiency of Bitcoin Cash," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 64(1), pages 411-427, July.
    8. Tran, Vu Le & Leirvik, Thomas, 2020. "Efficiency in the markets of crypto-currencies," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    9. Dunbar, Kwamie & Owusu-Amoako, Johnson, 2022. "Cryptocurrency returns under empirical asset pricing," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    10. Flori, Andrea, 2019. "News and subjective beliefs: A Bayesian approach to Bitcoin investments," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 336-356.
    11. Erdinc Akyildirim & Ahmet Goncu & Ahmet Sensoy, 2021. "Prediction of cryptocurrency returns using machine learning," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 297(1), pages 3-36, February.
    12. Antonakakis, Nikolaos & Chatziantoniou, Ioannis & Gabauer, David, 2019. "Cryptocurrency market contagion: Market uncertainty, market complexity, and dynamic portfolios," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 37-51.
    13. Muhammad Anas & Syed Jawad Hussain Shahzad & Larisa Yarovaya, 2024. "The use of high-frequency data in cryptocurrency research: a meta-review of literature with bibliometric analysis," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 1-31, December.
    14. Karasiński Jacek, 2023. "The adaptive market hypothesis and the return predictability in the cryptocurrency markets," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 9(1), pages 94-118, April.
    15. Al-Yahyaee, Khamis Hamed & Mensi, Walid & Ko, Hee-Un & Yoon, Seong-Min & Kang, Sang Hoon, 2020. "Why cryptocurrency markets are inefficient: The impact of liquidity and volatility," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    16. Tomé Lima & Helder Sebastião, 2023. "Native Market Factors for Pricing Cryptocurrencies," Notas Económicas, Faculty of Economics, University of Coimbra, issue 57, pages 71-85, December.
    17. Aktham Maghyereh & Mohammad Al-Shboul, 2024. "Have the extraordinary circumstances of the COVID-19 outbreak and the Russian–Ukrainian conflict impacted the efficiency of cryptocurrencies?," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 1-28, December.
    18. José Almeida & Tiago Cruz Gonçalves, 2024. "Cryptocurrency market microstructure: a systematic literature review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 332(1), pages 1035-1068, January.
    19. Corbet, Shaen & Lucey, Brian & Urquhart, Andrew & Yarovaya, Larisa, 2019. "Cryptocurrencies as a financial asset: A systematic analysis," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 182-199.
    20. Leirvik, Thomas, 2022. "Cryptocurrency returns and the volatility of liquidity," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Artificial intelligence (AI); Crypto assets; Quantile-based efficiency; ChatGPT;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C12 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Hypothesis Testing: General
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • G40 - Financial Economics - - Behavioral Finance - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:66:y:2024:i:c:s154461232400638x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/frl .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.