IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eurman/v42y2024i2p161-172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Walking interviews in organizational research

Author

Listed:
  • Bilsland, Karen
  • Siebert, Sabina

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to discuss the benefits of walking interviews in organizational research. We discuss five specific strengths of walking interviews and compare them to sit-down interviews and shadowing. Cognisant of the importance of place within which research is conducted, we analyze the walking interview method of collecting research material, and we put forward socio-spatial methodology for application in organizational research. The key theme running through this paper is that the place where research takes place matters; it matters when the focus of research is on materiality of organizations, but it also yields insights into other (place-sensitive) organizational phenomena. We identify five strengths of walking interviews: co-creation of meaning, reversal of power between interviewer and interviewee, places as prompts, the interview as a sensory experience, and insights into emotions. We discuss limitations of walking interviews, as well as strategies for mitigating these limitations.

Suggested Citation

  • Bilsland, Karen & Siebert, Sabina, 2024. "Walking interviews in organizational research," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 161-172.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:42:y:2024:i:2:p:161-172
    DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2023.04.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237323000506
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.emj.2023.04.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nathalie Raulet-Croset & Anni Borzeix, 2014. "Researching spatial practices through Commentated Walks: “on the move” and “walking with”," Post-Print halshs-01999533, HAL.
    2. Wanda J Orlikowski, 2006. "Material knowing: the scaffolding of human knowledgeability," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(5), pages 460-466, October.
    3. Henry Mintzberg, 1970. "Structured Observation As A Method To Study Managerial Work," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(1), pages 87-104, February.
    4. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513570510627748 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Samantha Warren, 2005. "Photography and voice in critical qualitative management research," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(6), pages 861-882, December.
    6. Susan Halford, 2004. "‘Towards a Sociology of Organizational Space’," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 9(1), pages 13-28, February.
    7. Lindberg, Kajsa & Czarniawska, Barbara, 2006. "Knotting the action net, or organizing between organizations," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 292-306, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ladds, Emma & Greenhalgh, Trisha & Byng, Richard & Rybczynska-Bunt, Sarah & Kalin, Asli & Shaw, Sara, 2023. "A contemporary ontology of continuity in general practice: Capturing its multiple essences in a digital age," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    2. Palo, Teea & Åkesson, Maria & Löfberg, Nina, 2019. "Servitization as business model contestation: A practice approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 486-496.
    3. Davide Nicolini, 2011. "Practice as the Site of Knowing: Insights from the Field of Telemedicine," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 602-620, June.
    4. Lisa Blix Germundsson & Sören Augustinsson & Alina Lidén, 2020. "Collaboration in the Making—Towards a Practice-Based Approach to University Innovation Intermediary Organisations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-14, June.
    5. Manning, Stephan & Vavilov, Stanislav, 2023. "Global development agenda meets local opportunities: The rise of development-focused entrepreneurship support," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(7).
    6. Barbara Czarniawska, 2011. "Anthropology and the organisation theory. Yesterday and today (Antropologia i teoria organizacji. Wczoraj i dzis)," Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 9(32), pages 11-29.
    7. Shameen Prashantham & Mark P. Healey, 2022. "Strategy as Practice Research: Reflections on its Rationale, Approach, and Contributions," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(8), pages 1-17, December.
    8. Md. Rahat Khan, 2021. "A critical analysis of Elon Musk’s leadership in Tesla motors," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 11(1), pages 213-222, December.
    9. Robert Hrelja & Fredrik Pettersson & Stig Westerdahl, 2016. "The Qualities Needed for a Successful Collaboration: A Contribution to the Conceptual Understanding of Collaboration for Efficient Public Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-15, June.
    10. Marianna Lena Kambanou, 2020. "Life Cycle Costing: Understanding How It Is Practised and Its Relationship to Life Cycle Management—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-19, April.
    11. Aurélie Dudézert & Nathalie Mitev & Ewan Oiry, 2021. "Cultural metaphors and KMS appropriation: drawing on Astérix to understand non-use in a large French company," Post-Print hal-03227049, HAL.
    12. M. Aenne Schoop & Marco Verweij & Ulrich Kühnen & Shenghua Luan, 2020. "Political disagreement in the classroom: testing cultural theory through structured observation," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 623-643, April.
    13. Pipan, Tatiana & Czarniawska, Barbara, 2010. "How to construct an actor-network: Management accounting from idea to practice," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 243-251.
    14. Joep P. Cornelissen, 2017. "Preserving Theoretical Divergence in Management Research: Why the Explanatory Potential of Qualitative Research Should Be Harnessed Rather than Suppressed," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(3), pages 368-383, May.
    15. Steensen, Elmer Fly, 2014. "Five types of organizational strategy," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 266-281.
    16. Yvonne Tobias-Miersch, 2017. "Beyond trust: towards a practice-based understanding of governing ‘network organizations’," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 21(2), pages 473-498, June.
    17. Martikainen, Jari & Hujala, Anneli & Taskinen, Helena, 2024. "Studying social representations of cross-boundary collaboration between managers through drawings," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 42(6), pages 907-919.
    18. Subhashini Sundram & Nur Aira Abdrahim, 2022. "On-the-Job Learning among CEOs in Malaysian Private Organizations," Journal of Public Administration and Governance, Macrothink Institute, vol. 12(4S), pages 117128-1171, December.
    19. Fabianski, Caroline, 2018. "Partnering for quality and performance: A standpoint for enhanced services," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 135-143.
    20. Carson, David & Gilmore, Audrey, 2000. "SME marketing management competencies," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 363-382, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:42:y:2024:i:2:p:161-172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/115/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.