IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eurman/v37y2019i1p18-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accounting for the formation of scientific fields in organization studies

Author

Listed:
  • Américo, Bruno Luiz
  • Carniel, Fagner
  • Clegg, Stewart Roger

Abstract

There are few qualitative organizational accounts that explore the constitution of scientific fields in management. We developed a methodology for understanding the academic modes of scientific knowledge production in management research from the perspective of the sociology of scientific knowledge (SSK) and actor-network theory (ANT). SSK and ANT offer a way to account for how scientific fields in organization studies are enacted. Key to this process are splitting and inversion of statements; credibility and network formation; and the concepts of credit, trajectory, and position. Specific statements making key knowledge claims (e.g., handbooks, special editions) are situated in academic practices that obscure those rhetorical strategies that enable the production of a network of knowledge that can act, organizationally, as a more or less unified sub-field. We take as a starting point a collection of texts, dated 2011, which sought to systematize the main currents of a disciplinary sub-field during the last decade, focusing on how statements are transformed into scientific certainty and how the question of credibility is established. The sub-field is that of organizational learning (OL). The particular language of OL relies on approaches that make its epistemic assumptions intelligible within a network. It is a language that tends to reify and naturalize specific practices that become accredited as organization learning. The material/textual artifacts that sustain these practices, instead of being reified, can be reframed as enacting a scientific field whose resignification acts upon the network that enabled its existence.

Suggested Citation

  • Américo, Bruno Luiz & Carniel, Fagner & Clegg, Stewart Roger, 2019. "Accounting for the formation of scientific fields in organization studies," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 18-28.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:37:y:2019:i:1:p:18-28
    DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2018.11.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237318301427
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.emj.2018.11.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elizabeth Loiola & Antonio Virgilio Bittencourt Bastos, 2003. "Ampliando perspectivas para a análise da pesquisa sobre aprendizagem organizacional: uma tréplica," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 7(3), pages 213-219.
    2. Czarniawska, Barbara, 2017. "Bruno Latour and Niklas Luhmann as organization theorists," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 145-150.
    3. Edgar H. Schein, 1990. "Organizational Culture: What it is and How to Change it," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Paul Evans & Yves Doz & André Laurent (ed.), Human Resource Management in International Firms, chapter 0, pages 56-82, Palgrave Macmillan.
    4. Antonello, Claudia Simone & Godoy, Arilda Schmidt, 2009. "Uma agenda brasileira para os estudos em aprendizagem organizacional," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 49(3), July.
    5. Orlikowski, W. J. & Scott, Susan V., 2015. "Exploring material-discursive practices," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 57600, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Giovan Francesco Lanzara & Gerardo Patriotta, 2001. "Technology and The Courtroom: An Inquiry into Knowledge Making in Organizations," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(7), pages 943-971, November.
    7. Roberto Ruas & Claudia Simone Antonello, 2003. "Repensando os referenciais analíticos em aprendizagem organizacional: uma alternativa para análise multidimensional," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 7(3), pages 203-212.
    8. Mark Easterby‐Smith & Mary Crossan & Davide Nicolini, 2000. "Organizational Learning: Debates Past, Present And Future," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 783-796, September.
    9. Linda L. Putnam, 2015. "Unpacking the Dialectic: Alternative Views on the Discourse–Materiality Relationship," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(5), pages 706-716, July.
    10. Claudia Simone Antonello & Arilda Schmidt Godoy, 2010. "The crossroads of organizational learning: a multiparadigmatic view," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 14(2), pages 310-332.
    11. Czarniawska, Barbara, 2004. "On Time, Space, and Action Nets," GRI-rapport 2004:5, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg Research Institute GRI.
    12. Wanda J. Orlikowski & Susan V. Scott, 2015. "Exploring Material-Discursive Practices," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(5), pages 697-705, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Markus Reihlen & Jan‐Florian Schlapfner & Monika Seeger & Hannah Trittin‐Ulbrich, 2022. "Strategic Venturing as Legitimacy Creation: The Case of Sustainability," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(2), pages 417-459, March.
    2. Carol Atkinson & Fiona Carmichael & Jo Duberley, 2021. "The Menopause Taboo at Work: Examining Women’s Embodied Experiences of Menopause in the UK Police Service," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 35(4), pages 657-676, August.
    3. Orlikowski, Wanda J. & Scott, Susan V., 2023. "The digital undertow and institutional displacement: a sociomaterial approach," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 119271, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Haridimos Tsoukas & Gerardo Patriotta & Kathleen M. Sutcliffe & Sally Maitlis, 2020. "On the way to Ithaka[1]: Commemorating the 50th Anniversary of the Publication of Karl E. Weick’s The Social Psychology of Organizing," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(7), pages 1315-1330, November.
    5. Burger, Katharina & White, Leroy & Yearworth, Mike, 2019. "Developing a smart operational research with hybrid practice theories," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 1137-1150.
    6. Morgan-Thomas, Anna & Dessart, Laurence & Veloutsou, Cleopatra, 2020. "Digital ecosystem and consumer engagement: A socio-technical perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 713-723.
    7. Ali Sunyaev & Daniel Fürstenau & Elizabeth Davidson, 2022. "Call for Papers, Issue 3/2024," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(4), pages 543-545, August.
    8. Constantinides, Panos & Slavova, Mira, 2020. "From a monopoly to an entrepreneurial field: The constitution of possibilities in South African energy," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(6).
    9. Jang, Kyeong Kook & Bae, Joonheui & Kim, Kyung Hoon, 2021. "Servitization experience measurement and the effect of servitization experience on brand resonance and customer retention," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 384-397.
    10. Nurzawani Shahrin & Hanafi Hussin, 2023. "Negotiating food heritage authenticity in consumer culture," Tourism and Hospitality Management, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Management, vol. 29(2), pages 185-195, April.
    11. Lugosi, Peter, 2016. "Socio-technological authentication," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 100-113.
    12. Ana Carolina Júlio & César Tureta, 2018. "“Turning garbage into luxury”: the materiality in practices of the carnival production," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 15(5), pages 427-443, September.
    13. Katharina Cepa, 2021. "Understanding interorganizational big data technologies: How technology adoption motivations and technology design shape collaborative dynamics," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(7), pages 1761-1799, November.
    14. Tabesh, Pooya & Mousavidin, Elham & Hasani, Sona, 2019. "Implementing big data strategies: A managerial perspective," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 347-358.
    15. Stefan Köngeter & Timo Schreiner, 2023. "Towards Inclusion: Systemic Change Through Organizational Education," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(2), pages 115-123.
    16. Adamonienė Rūta & Litavniece Lienite & Ruibytė Laima & Viduolienė Evelina, 2021. "Influence of individual and organisational variables on the perception of organisational values," Engineering Management in Production and Services, Sciendo, vol. 13(2), pages 7-17, June.
    17. Fiona Kun Yao & Kaifeng Jiang & Danielle R. Combs & Song Chang, 2022. "Informal institutions and absorptive capacity: A cross-country meta-analytic study," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(6), pages 1091-1109, August.
    18. Firican Diana Andreea, 2022. "The Influence of Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions on Attitude Towards Change and Innovation in Oganizations," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 509-518, August.
    19. Dario Blanco-Fernandez & Stephan Leitner & Alexandra Rausch, 2022. "Interactions between the individual and the group level in organizations: The case of learning and autonomous group adaptation," Papers 2203.09162, arXiv.org.
    20. Pirozzi Maria Grazia & Agliata Francesco & Tuccillo Danilo & Pirozzi Francesco, 2021. "Defining the Integrated Performance Measurement Systems in Small and Medium Enterprises: An Advanced Model," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(12), pages 203-203, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:37:y:2019:i:1:p:18-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/115/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.