IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v77y2019ics0149718919300266.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A mixed-methods evaluation using effectiveness perception surveys, social network analysis, and county-level health statistics: A pilot study of eight rural Indiana community health coalitions

Author

Listed:
  • Ken-Opurum, Jennifer
  • Lynch, Krystal
  • Vandergraff, Donna
  • Miller, Douglas K.
  • Savaiano, Dennis A.

Abstract

Community health coalitions (CHCs) are a promising approach for addressing disparities in rural health statistics. However, their effectiveness has been variable, and evaluation methods have been insufficient and inconsistent. Thus, we propose a mixed-methods evaluation framework and discuss pilot study findings. CHCs in our pilot study partnered with Purdue Extension. Extension links communities and land grant universities, providing programming and support for community-engaged research. We conducted social network analysis and effectiveness perception surveys in CHCs in 8 rural Indiana counties during summer 2017 and accessed county-level health statistics from 2015-16. We compared calculated variables (i.e., effectiveness survey k-means clusters, network measures, health status/outcomes) using Pearson’s correlations. CHC members’ positive perceptions of their leadership and functioning correlated with interconnectedness in their partnership networks, while more centralized partnership networks correlated with CHC members reporting problems in their coalitions. CHCs with highly rated leadership and functioning developed in counties with poor infant/maternal health and opioid outcomes. Likewise, CHCs reporting fewer problems for participation developed in counties with poor infant/maternal health, poor opioid outcomes, and more people without healthcare coverage. This pilot study provides a framework for iterative CHC evaluation. As the evidence grows, we will make recommendations for best practices that optimize CHC partnerships to improve local health in rural areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Ken-Opurum, Jennifer & Lynch, Krystal & Vandergraff, Donna & Miller, Douglas K. & Savaiano, Dennis A., 2019. "A mixed-methods evaluation using effectiveness perception surveys, social network analysis, and county-level health statistics: A pilot study of eight rural Indiana community health coalitions," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:77:y:2019:i:c:s0149718919300266
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101709
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718919300266
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101709?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simmons, Vani Nath & Klasko, Lynne B. & Fleming, Khaliah & Koskan, Alexis M. & Jackson, Nia T. & Noel-Thomas, Shalewa & Luque, John S. & Vadaparampil, Susan T. & Lee, Ji-Hyun & Quinn, Gwendolyn P. & B, 2015. "Participatory evaluation of a community–academic partnership to inform capacity-building and sustainability," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 19-26.
    2. Valente, Thomas W. & Coronges, Kathryn A. & Stevens, Gregory D. & Cousineau, Michael R., 2008. "Collaboration and competition in a children's health initiative coalition: A network analysis," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 392-402, November.
    3. Andrews, M.L. & Sánchez, V. & Carrillo, C. & Allen-Ananins, B. & Cruz, Y.B., 2014. "Using a participatory evaluation design to create an online data collection and monitoring system for New Mexico's Community Health Councils," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 32-42.
    4. Steffie Lucidarme & Greet Cardon & Annick Willem, 2016. "A Comparative Study of Health Promotion Networks: Configurations of determinants for network effectiveness," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(8), pages 1163-1217, September.
    5. Valente, T.W. & Chich, P.C. & Pentz, M.A., 2007. "Community coalitions as a system: Effects of network change on adoption of evidence-based substance abuse prevention," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 97(5), pages 880-886.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patterson, Megan S. & Prochnow, Tyler & Richardson, Ryan G. & Jackson, Kevin P., 2020. "Using network analysis to conduct a system-wide program evaluation within a university," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    2. Schoen, Martin W. & Moreland-Russell, Sarah & Prewitt, Kim & Carothers, Bobbi J., 2014. "Social network analysis of public health programs to measure partnership," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 90-95.
    3. Chen T & Lu N & White AM & He H & Wu P & Hui J & Feng C & Tu XM & Zhang H & Kowalski J, 2016. "Social Network: A New Paradigm for Modeling Human Interaction: Implications for Statistical Inferences," Biostatistics and Biometrics Open Access Journal, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 1(1), pages 1-6, September.
    4. Katarzyna Sienkiewicz-Małyjurek & Tomasz Owczarek, 2020. "Complementarity of Communication and Coordination in Ensuring Effectiveness of Emergency Management Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Mei-Jung Chen & Wen-Bin Lin & Shao-Wei Yeh & Mei-Yen Chen, 2021. "Constructing Sports Promotion Models for an Accessibility and Efficiency Analysis of City Governments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-15, August.
    6. C. M. Straw & B. P. McCullough & C. Segars & B. Daher & M. S. Patterson, 2022. "Reimagining Sustainable Community Sports Fields of the Future: a Framework for Convergent Science-Stakeholder Decision-Making," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    7. Pagliccia, Nino & Spiegel, Jerry & Alegret, Milagros & Bonet, Mariano & Martinez, Barbara & Yassi, Annalee, 2010. "Network analysis as a tool to assess the intersectoral management of health determinants at the local level: A report from an exploratory study of two Cuban municipalities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(2), pages 394-399, July.
    8. McNeish, Roxann & Rigg, Khary K. & Tran, Quynh & Hodges, Sharon, 2019. "Community-based behavioral health interventions: Developing strong community partnerships," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 111-115.
    9. Aoife De Brún & Eilish McAuliffe, 2018. "Social Network Analysis as a Methodological Approach to Explore Health Systems: A Case Study Exploring Support among Senior Managers/Executives in a Hospital Network," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-11, March.
    10. Garney, Whitney R. & Patterson, Megan S. & Garcia, Kristen & Muraleetharan, Daenuka & McLeroy, Kenneth, 2020. "Interorganizational network findings from a nationwide cardiovascular disease prevention initiative," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    11. Scarinci, Isabel C. & Moore, Artisha & Benjamin, Regina & Vickers, Selwyn & Shikany, James & Fouad, Mona, 2017. "A participatory evaluation framework in the establishment and implementation of transdisciplinary collaborative centers for health disparities research," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 37-45.
    12. Bunger, Alicia C. & Collins-Camargo, Crystal & McBeath, Bowen & Chuang, Emmeline & Pérez-Jolles, Monica & Wells, Rebecca, 2014. "Collaboration, competition, and co-opetition: Interorganizational dynamics between private child welfare agencies and child serving sectors," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 113-122.
    13. Provan, Keith G. & Leischow, Scott J. & Keagy, Judith & Nodora, Jesse, 2010. "Research collaboration in the discovery, development, and delivery networks of a statewide cancer coalition," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 349-355, November.
    14. Harris, Jenine K. & Luke, Douglas A. & Burke, Ryan C. & Mueller, Nancy B., 2008. "Seeing the forest and the trees: Using network analysis to develop an organizational blueprint of state tobacco control systems," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 1669-1678, December.
    15. McLinden, Daniel, 2013. "Concept maps as network data: Analysis of a concept map using the methods of social network analysis," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 40-48.
    16. Bustos, Tatiana E., 2020. "A scoping review of social network analyses in interorganizational collaboration studies for child mental health," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    17. Calvin Weng & Tugrul Daim, 2012. "Structural Differentiation and Its Implications—Core/Periphery Structure of the Technological Network," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 3(4), pages 327-342, December.
    18. Rocco Palumbo & Mohammad Fakhar Manesh & Massimiliano M. Pellegrini & Giulia Flamini, 2020. "Exploiting Inter-Organizational Relationships in Health Care: A Bibliometric Analysis and Literature Review," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-22, August.
    19. Rodriguez, Rocio & Svensson, Göran & Wood, Greg, 2020. "Sustainability trends in public hospitals: Efforts and priorities," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    20. Colvin, Marianna L., 2017. "Mapping the inter-organizational landscape of child maltreatment prevention and service delivery: A network analysis," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 352-359.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:77:y:2019:i:c:s0149718919300266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.