IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/infome/v18y2024i1s1751157724000038.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the stability of collaboration networks: A structural cohesion analysis perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Dayong
  • Men, Hao
  • Zhang, Zhaoxin

Abstract

In collaboration networks, a stable structure can lead to trust and enhance group members’ ties, in turn reducing conflicts and promoting communication and cooperation. Therefore, network stability assessment, especially for collaboration networks, is essential for facilitating the achievement of group goals. However, most previous studies have considered only a fundamental understanding of network stability from the perspective of network connectivity or interpersonal relationships. Few studies have been conducted to reveal the influence of endogenous structural cohesion on network stability. In fact, greater structural cohesion indicates greater adaptability in uncertain environments. Thus, we propose evaluating the stability of collaboration networks from a structural cohesion perspective. Our study focuses on two dimensions of structural cohesion: core member identification and structural robustness measurements. Considering the unique structure of collaboration networks, a new algorithm, named the improved K-shell decomposition algorithm, is proposed to identify the core member set embedded in the innermost layer of a network. Compared with traditional identification algorithms, our algorithm can achieve a better trade-off between computational accuracy and computational complexity. Experimental results obtained on real-world networks verify the performance of our algorithm. In addition, it was found that the stability of collaboration networks can be effectively improved through targeted prevention efforts at the core members identified by our algorithm.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Dayong & Men, Hao & Zhang, Zhaoxin, 2024. "Assessing the stability of collaboration networks: A structural cohesion analysis perspective," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:infome:v:18:y:2024:i:1:s1751157724000038
    DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2024.101490
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157724000038
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.joi.2024.101490?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:infome:v:18:y:2024:i:1:s1751157724000038. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/joi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.