IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v20y1997i3p237-249.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Designing a process evaluation for a comprehensive breast cancer screening intervention: Challenges and opportunities

Author

Listed:
  • Viadro, Claire I.
  • Earp, Jo Anne L.
  • Altpeter, Mary

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Viadro, Claire I. & Earp, Jo Anne L. & Altpeter, Mary, 1997. "Designing a process evaluation for a comprehensive breast cancer screening intervention: Challenges and opportunities," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 237-249, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:20:y:1997:i:3:p:237-249
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149-7189(97)00001-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wickizer, T.M. & Von Korff, M. & Cheadle, A. & Maeser, J. & Wagner, E.H. & Pearson, D. & Beery, W. & Psaty, B.M., 1993. "Activating communities for health promotion: A process evaluation method," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 83(4), pages 561-567.
    2. Altman, David G., 1986. "A framework for evaluating community-based heart disease prevention programs," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 479-487, January.
    3. Chambers, Fred, 1994. "Removing confusion about formative and summative evaluation: Purpose versus time," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 9-12.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Saunders, Ruth P. & Ward, Dianne & Felton, Gwen M. & Dowda, Marsha & Pate, Russell R., 2006. "Examining the link between program implementation and behavior outcomes in the lifestyle education for activity program (LEAP)," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 352-364, November.
    2. Cunningham, Louise E. & Michielutte, Robert & Dignan, Mark & Sharp, Penny & Boxley, Jeanne, 2000. "The value of process evaluation in a community-based cancer control program," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 13-25, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schmidt, Christoph M. & Baltussen, Rob & Sauerborn, Rainer, 2000. "The Evaluation of Community-Based Interventions: Group Randomization, Limits and Alternatives," IZA Discussion Papers 206, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Nilsen, Oystein, 1996. "Community health promotion: concepts and lessons from contemporary sociology," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 167-183, May.
    3. Mary-Anne Dehar & Sally Casswell & Paul Duignan, 1993. "Formative and Process Evaluation of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Programs," Evaluation Review, , vol. 17(2), pages 204-220, April.
    4. Valente, Thomas W. & Coronges, Kathryn A. & Stevens, Gregory D. & Cousineau, Michael R., 2008. "Collaboration and competition in a children's health initiative coalition: A network analysis," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 392-402, November.
    5. Sarah A. McGraw & Deborah E. Sellers & Carolyn C. Johnson & Elaine J. Stone & Kathryn J. Bachman & Judith Bebchuk & Russell V. Luepker & Elizabeth W. Edmundson, 1996. "Using Process Data To Explain Outcomes," Evaluation Review, , vol. 20(3), pages 291-312, June.
    6. Veikko Tähkä & Heimo Viinamäki & Kaj Koskela, 1990. "Interaction in Health Education," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 36(2), pages 99-110, June.
    7. Brooke S. Harrow & Thomas M. Lasater & Kim M. Gans, 1996. "A Strategy for Accurate Collection of Incremental Cost Data for Cost-Effectiveness Analyses in Field Trials," Evaluation Review, , vol. 20(3), pages 275-290, June.
    8. Hawe, Penelope & Noort, Michelle & King, Lesley & Jordens, Christopher, 1997. "Multiplying Health Gains: the critical role of capacity-building within health promotion programs," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 29-42, January.
    9. Allen Cheadle & Edward Wagner & Carolyn Anderman & Mary Walls & Colleen McBride & Michelle A. Bell & Richard F. Catalano & Eric Pettigrew, 1998. "Measuring Community Mobilization in the Seattle Minority Youth Health Project," Evaluation Review, , vol. 22(6), pages 699-716, December.
    10. Friedman, Stacey R. & Reynolds, Jesse & Quan, Michael A. & Call, Stephanie & Crusto, Cindy A. & Kaufman, Joy S., 2007. "Measuring changes in interagency collaboration: An examination of the Bridgeport Safe Start Initiative," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 294-306, August.
    11. Feinberg, Mark E. & Greenberg, Mark T. & Osgood, D. Wayne & Anderson, Amy & Babinski, Leslie, 2002. "The effects of training community leaders in prevention science: Communities That Care in Pennsylvania," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 245-259, August.
    12. Heflinger, Craig Anne, 1996. "Measuring service system coordination in managed mental health care for children and youth," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 155-163, May.
    13. Brown, J. Lynne & Kiernan, Nancy Ellen, 2001. "Assessing the subsequent effect of a formative evaluation on a program," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 129-143, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:20:y:1997:i:3:p:237-249. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.