Author
Listed:
- Teruel-Belismelis, Graciela
- Maldonado, Jorge H.
- Peters-Castilla, Marlene
- Triano-Enríquez, Manuel
Abstract
The aim of this study is to identify systematic and generalizable strengths and weaknesses in the processes for implementing four graduation programs carried out in Colombia (2), Mexico, and Paraguay in 2015–17. The specific aims are to identify some of the key factors common to these processes and their contribution to the efficiency of program implementation, as well as to not others that may not appear in all these processes but may affect the implementation of programs and alter their results. The identification of these factors can provide empirical evidence for “lessons learned” that can facilitate their replication in other countries. The procedure is to analyze qualitative data which were collected during the process evaluation of each program from 2015 to 2018, by using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to guide the analysis. Constructs that strongly influence implementation effectiveness were identified through a cross- case comparison of ratings. The categories of analysis are the domains: intervention characteristics, outer settings, inner settings, characteristics of individuals and process and these were used in a concrete study of three general processes: planning, preparation, and implementation. Among the lessons learned were the importance of marketing networks for the goods and services produced by beneficiaries; the importance of leadership engagement of the field team and a good learning climate for them; the need to consider differences in the educational level of beneficiaries, their ability to run a business, and their local micro contexts in the program design.
Suggested Citation
Teruel-Belismelis, Graciela & Maldonado, Jorge H. & Peters-Castilla, Marlene & Triano-Enríquez, Manuel, 2026.
"Lessons learned in the implementation of graduation programs: The experience of Colombia, Mexico, and Paraguay,"
Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:epplan:v:115:y:2026:i:c:s0149718925002137
DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102746
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:115:y:2026:i:c:s0149718925002137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.