IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v20y1996i3p291-312.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Process Data To Explain Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah A. McGraw

    (New England Research Institutes)

  • Deborah E. Sellers

    (New England Research Institutes)

  • Carolyn C. Johnson

    (Tulane University)

  • Elaine J. Stone

    (National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute)

  • Kathryn J. Bachman

    (University of California, San Diego)

  • Judith Bebchuk

    (New England Research Institutes)

  • Russell V. Luepker

    (University of Minnesota)

  • Elizabeth W. Edmundson

    (University of Texas)

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to illustrate the use of process evaluation for understanding study outcomes. Data from the Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health (CATCH), a large school-based field trial, are used. Teacher characteristics, measures of classroom curriculum implementation, and competing influences are linked to changes in dietary knowledge, intentions, and self-efficacy of students in the intervention schools. Multiple regression analyses indicate that teacher charactenstics did not predict program implementation. Teacher characteristics and program fidelity, or the number of modifications made to the classroom curriculum during implementation, had direct and independent effects on student outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah A. McGraw & Deborah E. Sellers & Carolyn C. Johnson & Elaine J. Stone & Kathryn J. Bachman & Judith Bebchuk & Russell V. Luepker & Elizabeth W. Edmundson, 1996. "Using Process Data To Explain Outcomes," Evaluation Review, , vol. 20(3), pages 291-312, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:20:y:1996:i:3:p:291-312
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9602000304
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X9602000304
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X9602000304?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lefebvre, R.C. & Harden, E.A. & Rakowski, W. & Lasater, T.M. & Carleton, R.A., 1987. "Characteristics of participants in community health promotion programs: Four-year results," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 77(10), pages 1342-1344.
    2. Altman, David G., 1986. "A framework for evaluating community-based heart disease prevention programs," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 479-487, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schmidt, Christoph M. & Baltussen, Rob & Sauerborn, Rainer, 2000. "The Evaluation of Community-Based Interventions: Group Randomization, Limits and Alternatives," IZA Discussion Papers 206, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Mary-Anne Dehar & Sally Casswell & Paul Duignan, 1993. "Formative and Process Evaluation of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Programs," Evaluation Review, , vol. 17(2), pages 204-220, April.
    3. Viadro, Claire I. & Earp, Jo Anne L. & Altpeter, Mary, 1997. "Designing a process evaluation for a comprehensive breast cancer screening intervention: Challenges and opportunities," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 237-249, August.
    4. Veikko Tähkä & Heimo Viinamäki & Kaj Koskela, 1990. "Interaction in Health Education," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 36(2), pages 99-110, June.
    5. Brooke S. Harrow & Thomas M. Lasater & Kim M. Gans, 1996. "A Strategy for Accurate Collection of Incremental Cost Data for Cost-Effectiveness Analyses in Field Trials," Evaluation Review, , vol. 20(3), pages 275-290, June.
    6. Sarah A. McGraw & Sonja M. McKinlay & Lynne McClements & Thomas M. Lasater & Annlouise Assaf & Richard A. Carleton, 1989. "Methods in Program Evaluation," Evaluation Review, , vol. 13(5), pages 459-483, October.
    7. Feinberg, Mark E. & Greenberg, Mark T. & Osgood, D. Wayne & Anderson, Amy & Babinski, Leslie, 2002. "The effects of training community leaders in prevention science: Communities That Care in Pennsylvania," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 245-259, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:20:y:1996:i:3:p:291-312. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.