IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v112y2025ics0149718925001351.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can programme budget preparation mechanisms improve the allocation of public resources? Examples from ministries in Cameroon

Author

Listed:
  • Pierre, Onana Simon
  • Diaby, Ousmane

Abstract

This article examines the impact of programme budget preparation mechanisms on the allocation of public resources in Cameroon. To achieve this, we first conducted an exploratory study of eight officials involved in preparing the state budget. This exploratory study enabled us to develop the variables that would lead to an analytical model. A survey was carried out with 475 actors in the budget design process in central services of 29 ministries in Cameroon. Findings from simple probit regressions indicate that programme budget preparation mechanisms improve the allocation of budgetary resources in Cameroon. According to estimates, multi-annuality, expenditure reviews, performance measurement indicators and the structuring of appropriations into programmes, actions, activities and tasks have a positive impact on the allocation of budget revenue. However, this positive impact is mitigated by the Parliament's limited role in budgetary authorisation. The study recommends that external budgetary controls should be stepped up.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierre, Onana Simon & Diaby, Ousmane, 2025. "Can programme budget preparation mechanisms improve the allocation of public resources? Examples from ministries in Cameroon," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:112:y:2025:i:c:s0149718925001351
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102668
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925001351
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102668?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:112:y:2025:i:c:s0149718925001351. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.