IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v108y2025ics0149718924000971.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

To scope or not to scope? The benefits and challenges of integrating scoping studies in rapid qualitative research and evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Iqbal, Syka
  • Chepo, Macarena
  • Hébert, Marc
  • Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia

Abstract

Creating sustainable change and fostering collaborative relationships between researchers and stakeholders is a recognized challenge in the field of evaluation. Identifying programme purpose, cultural context, potential challenges, and engaging stakeholders before an evaluation can produce responsive and impactful evaluations. This paper discusses implementing a targeted scoping study within the framework of rapid qualitative research and evaluation. A scoping study enables collaborative decision-making on evaluation priorities, and functions as an evaluability assessment in time-sensitive contexts. In our experience, a scoping study can be carried out in as little as five days or as long as six weeks. It is timely to revisit the question of what factors influence evaluation outcomes, a scoping study can be used to support an evaluation, address access to data and research, and strengthen communication channels. The methodological approach was used to co-produce an evaluation with an NGO that accurately reflected their needs, recognizing possible challenges and solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Iqbal, Syka & Chepo, Macarena & Hébert, Marc & Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia, 2025. "To scope or not to scope? The benefits and challenges of integrating scoping studies in rapid qualitative research and evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:108:y:2025:i:c:s0149718924000971
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102495
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718924000971
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102495?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McNall, Miles A. & Welch, Vincent E. & Ruh, Kari L. & Mildner, Carolyn A. & Soto, Tomas, 2004. "The use of rapid-feedback evaluation methods to improve the retention rates of an HIV/AIDS healthcare intervention," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 287-294, August.
    2. Shayda Mae Sabet & Annette N. Brown, 2018. "Is impact evaluation still on the rise? The new trends in 2010–2015," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 291-304, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francis Rathinam & Sayak Khatua & Zeba Siddiqui & Manya Malik & Pallavi Duggal & Samantha Watson & Xavier Vollenweider, 2021. "Using big data for evaluating development outcomes: A systematic map," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), September.
    2. Smith, Bryce D. & Kalayil, Elizabeth J. & Patel-Larson, Alpa & Chen, Brenda & Vaughan, Marla, 2012. "Retaining clients in an outcome monitoring evaluation study: HIV prevention efforts in community settings," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 16-24.
    3. Stacy,Brian William & Kitzmüller,Lucas & Wang,Xiaoyu & Mahler,Daniel Gerszon & Serajuddin,Umar, 2024. "Missing Evidence : Tracking Academic Data Use around the World," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10673, The World Bank.
    4. Maruyama, Takao, 2023. "Using evidence to improve and scale up development program in education: A case study from India," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 32(C).
    5. Benjamin Schwab, 2020. "In the Form of Bread? A Randomized Comparison of Cash and Food Transfers in Yemen," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(1), pages 91-113, January.
    6. Hugh Sharma Waddington & Paul Fenton Villar & Jeffrey C. Valentine, 2023. "Can Non-Randomised Studies of Interventions Provide Unbiased Effect Estimates? A Systematic Review of Internal Replication Studies," Evaluation Review, , vol. 47(3), pages 563-593, June.
    7. Ashrita Saran & Eti Rajwar & Bhumika T. V. & Divya S. Patil & Howard White, 2020. "PROTOCOL: Development evaluations in India 2000–2018: A country impact evaluation map," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), December.
    8. Hamidou Jawara, 2020. "Access to savings and household welfare evidence from a household survey in The Gambia," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 32(2), pages 138-149, June.
    9. Masaki,Takaaki & Madson,B., 2023. "Data Gaps in Microdata in the Context of Forced Displacement," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10631, The World Bank.
    10. Richard Manning & Ian Goldman & Gonzalo Hernández Licona, 2020. "The impact of impact evaluation: Are impact evaluation and impact evaluation synthesis contributing to evidence generation and use in low- and middle-income countries?," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2020-20, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    11. Seán M. Muller, 2021. "Evidence for a YETI? A Cautionary Tale from South Africa's Youth Employment Tax Incentive," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 52(6), pages 1301-1342, November.
    12. Pierre Marion & Etienne Lwamba & Andrea Floridi & Suvarna Pande & Megha Bhattacharyya & Sarah Young & Paul Fenton Villar & Shannon Shisler, 2024. "The effects of agricultural output market access interventions on agricultural, socio‐economic, food security, and nutrition outcomes in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), June.
    13. Obie Porteous, 2022. "Research Deserts and Oases: Evidence from 27 Thousand Economics Journal Articles on Africa," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 84(6), pages 1235-1258, December.
    14. O’Leary, Susan & Smith, David, 2020. "Moments of resistance: An internally persuasive view of performance and impact reports in non-governmental organizations," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    15. Paul Fenton Villar & Tomasz Kozakiewicz & Vinitha Bachina & Sarah Young & Shannon Shisler, 2023. "PROTOCOL: The effects of agricultural output market access interventions on agricultural, socio‐economic and food and nutrition security outcomes in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A systematic revi," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:108:y:2025:i:c:s0149718924000971. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.