IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wbk/wbrwps/10631.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Data Gaps in Microdata in the Context of Forced Displacement

Author

Listed:
  • Masaki,Takaaki
  • Madson,B.

Abstract

This paper aims to understand the existing gaps in micro-level data on forcibly displaced people—refugees and internally displaced persons. The paper undertakes a comprehensive review of all existing micro-level data sets in the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Microdata Library and the World Bank Microdata Library. It first identifies a corpus of micro-level data sets that are designed to have a representative sample of refugees and/or internally displaced persons and assesses gaps in geographical and thematic coverage. The paper then evaluates whether the data sets contain a core set of questions that are essential for the proper identification of refugees and internally displaced persons. The findings show that microdata on forcibly displaced people are comparatively rich in Sub-Saharan Africa in contrast to other regions. However, data scarcity is notably pronounced in countries facing fragility and conflict. Scarcity is also evident among internally displaced persons and on topics such as labor and employment, finance (for instance, credit, debt, and banking), agriculture/livestock/fishery, and education. The paper also highlights that many of the existing micro-level data sets on forcibly displaced people do not contain the core set of questions needed for proper identification of refugees or internally displaced persons according to international statistical standards.

Suggested Citation

  • Masaki,Takaaki & Madson,B., 2023. "Data Gaps in Microdata in the Context of Forced Displacement," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10631, The World Bank.
    • Handle: RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:10631
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099556112062334277/pdf/IDU0161b812905efa046ca09d4909a91003ae709.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shayda Mae Sabet & Annette N. Brown, 2018. "Is impact evaluation still on the rise? The new trends in 2010–2015," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 291-304, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fabian Dávila & Favio Cala-Vitery, 2025. "Social Fragility: Impact of Early Fertility and Domestic Violence in Colombia During the Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(3), pages 1-15, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Iqbal, Syka & Chepo, Macarena & Hébert, Marc & Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia, 2025. "To scope or not to scope? The benefits and challenges of integrating scoping studies in rapid qualitative research and evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    2. Francis Rathinam & Sayak Khatua & Zeba Siddiqui & Manya Malik & Pallavi Duggal & Samantha Watson & Xavier Vollenweider, 2021. "Using big data for evaluating development outcomes: A systematic map," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), September.
    3. Maruyama, Takao, 2023. "Using evidence to improve and scale up development program in education: A case study from India," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 32(C).
    4. Hugh Sharma Waddington & Paul Fenton Villar & Jeffrey C. Valentine, 2023. "Can Non-Randomised Studies of Interventions Provide Unbiased Effect Estimates? A Systematic Review of Internal Replication Studies," Evaluation Review, , vol. 47(3), pages 563-593, June.
    5. Hamidou Jawara, 2020. "Access to savings and household welfare evidence from a household survey in The Gambia," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 32(2), pages 138-149, June.
    6. Richard Manning & Ian Goldman & Gonzalo Hernández Licona, 2020. "The impact of impact evaluation: Are impact evaluation and impact evaluation synthesis contributing to evidence generation and use in low- and middle-income countries?," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2020-20, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    7. Seán M. Muller, 2021. "Evidence for a YETI? A Cautionary Tale from South Africa's Youth Employment Tax Incentive," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 52(6), pages 1301-1342, November.
    8. Obie Porteous, 2022. "Research Deserts and Oases: Evidence from 27 Thousand Economics Journal Articles on Africa," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 84(6), pages 1235-1258, December.
    9. O’Leary, Susan & Smith, David, 2020. "Moments of resistance: An internally persuasive view of performance and impact reports in non-governmental organizations," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    10. Stacy,Brian William & Kitzmüller,Lucas & Wang,Xiaoyu & Mahler,Daniel Gerszon & Serajuddin,Umar, 2024. "Missing Evidence : Tracking Academic Data Use around the World," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10673, The World Bank.
    11. Benjamin Schwab, 2020. "In the Form of Bread? A Randomized Comparison of Cash and Food Transfers in Yemen," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(1), pages 91-113, January.
    12. Ashrita Saran & Eti Rajwar & Bhumika T. V. & Divya S. Patil & Howard White, 2020. "PROTOCOL: Development evaluations in India 2000–2018: A country impact evaluation map," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), December.
    13. Pierre Marion & Etienne Lwamba & Andrea Floridi & Suvarna Pande & Megha Bhattacharyya & Sarah Young & Paul Fenton Villar & Shannon Shisler, 2024. "The effects of agricultural output market access interventions on agricultural, socio‐economic, food security, and nutrition outcomes in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), June.
    14. Paul Fenton Villar & Tomasz Kozakiewicz & Vinitha Bachina & Sarah Young & Shannon Shisler, 2023. "PROTOCOL: The effects of agricultural output market access interventions on agricultural, socio‐economic and food and nutrition security outcomes in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A systematic revi," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), September.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:10631. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Roula I. Yazigi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dvewbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.