IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v35y2010i9p3578-3586.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sensitivity analysis of steam power plant-binary cycle

Author

Listed:
  • Rosyid, H.
  • Koestoer, R.
  • Putra, N.
  • Nasruddin,
  • Mohamad, A.A.
  • Yanuar,

Abstract

This paper analyses a steam power – two-stage binary cycle plant (SPP–2BCP), in which low temperature waste heat from a conventional steam power plant can be efficiently utilized to generate electricity by installing a bottoming binary cycle. The result from a previous calculation on the installation of binary cycle technology on a Steam Power Plant (SPP) with n-Pentane working fluid indicates an increase in plant efficiency of about 9%. The purpose of this study is to analyze the sensitivity of performance of the binary cycle system against variations in the SPP operational load and the condenser’s cooling water temperature. The calculation is conducted on SPP load variations of 25%, 50%, 75% and 100%, inlet turbine pressure variations of 5 bar–30 bar, and inlet turbine temperature variations of 125 °C up to 235 °C. Each of these is also analyzed with ambient cooling water temperatures of 30 °C–37 °C. The results of the analysis indicate that the performance of this binary cycle SPP degrades slightly with SPP load, turbine inlet temperature, and turbine inlet pressure variations and with cooling water variations.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosyid, H. & Koestoer, R. & Putra, N. & Nasruddin, & Mohamad, A.A. & Yanuar,, 2010. "Sensitivity analysis of steam power plant-binary cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 3578-3586.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:35:y:2010:i:9:p:3578-3586
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.04.038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544210002458
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2010.04.038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yari, Mortaza, 2010. "Exergetic analysis of various types of geothermal power plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 112-121.
    2. Wang, Jiangfeng & Dai, Yiping & Gao, Lin, 2009. "Exergy analyses and parametric optimizations for different cogeneration power plants in cement industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(6), pages 941-948, June.
    3. Madhawa Hettiarachchi, H.D. & Golubovic, Mihajlo & Worek, William M. & Ikegami, Yasuyuki, 2007. "Optimum design criteria for an Organic Rankine cycle using low-temperature geothermal heat sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(9), pages 1698-1706.
    4. Saleh, Bahaa & Koglbauer, Gerald & Wendland, Martin & Fischer, Johann, 2007. "Working fluids for low-temperature organic Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1210-1221.
    5. Verschoor, M.J.E. & Brouwer, E.P., 1995. "Description of the SMR cycle, which combines fluid elements of steam and organic Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 295-303.
    6. Kanoglu, Mehmet & Bolatturk, Ali, 2008. "Performance and parametric investigation of a binary geothermal power plant by exergy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(11), pages 2366-2374.
    7. Lolos, P.A. & Rogdakis, E.D., 2009. "A Kalina power cycle driven by renewable energy sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 457-464.
    8. Imroz Sohel, M. & Sellier, Mathieu & Brackney, Larry J. & Krumdieck, Susan, 2009. "Efficiency improvement for geothermal power generation to meet summer peak demand," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 3370-3376, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vélez, Fredy & Segovia, José & Chejne, Farid & Antolín, Gregorio & Quijano, Ana & Carmen Martín, M., 2011. "Low temperature heat source for power generation: Exhaustive analysis of a carbon dioxide transcritical power cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(9), pages 5497-5507.
    2. Vélez, Fredy & Segovia, José J. & Martín, M. Carmen & Antolín, Gregorio & Chejne, Farid & Quijano, Ana, 2012. "A technical, economical and market review of organic Rankine cycles for the conversion of low-grade heat for power generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(6), pages 4175-4189.
    3. Luo, Chao & Huang, Lichang & Gong, Yulie & Ma, Weibin, 2012. "Thermodynamic comparison of different types of geothermal power plant systems and case studies in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 155-160.
    4. Varma, G.V. Pradeep & Srinivas, T., 2017. "Power generation from low temperature heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 402-414.
    5. Topal, Huseyin & Taner, Tolga & Naqvi, Syed Arslan Hassan & Altınsoy, Yelda & Amirabedin, Ehsan & Ozkaymak, Mehmet, 2017. "Exergy analysis of a circulating fluidized bed power plant co-firing with olive pits: A case study of power plant in Turkey," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 40-46.
    6. Jung, Hoon & Hwang, Jungho, 2014. "Feasibility study of a combined Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion method in South Korea," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 443-452.
    7. Hasan, M.H. & Muzammil, W.K. & Mahlia, T.M.I. & Jannifar, A. & Hasanuddin, I., 2012. "A review on the pattern of electricity generation and emission in Indonesia from 1987 to 2009," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 3206-3219.
    8. Jie, Pengfei & Tian, Zhe & Yuan, Shanshan & Zhu, Neng, 2012. "Modeling the dynamic characteristics of a district heating network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 126-134.
    9. Di Gregorio, F. & Zaccariello, Lucio, 2012. "Fluidized bed gasification of a packaging derived fuel: energetic, environmental and economic performances comparison for waste-to-energy plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 331-341.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guo, T. & Wang, H.X. & Zhang, S.J., 2011. "Fluids and parameters optimization for a novel cogeneration system driven by low-temperature geothermal sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 2639-2649.
    2. Bao, Junjiang & Zhao, Li, 2012. "Exergy analysis and parameter study on a novel auto-cascade Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 539-547.
    3. Unverdi, Murat & Cerci, Yunus, 2013. "Performance analysis of Germencik Geothermal Power Plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 192-200.
    4. Lai, Ngoc Anh & Fischer, Johann, 2012. "Efficiencies of power flash cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 1017-1027.
    5. Guzović, Z. & Lončar, D. & Ferdelji, N., 2010. "Possibilities of electricity generation in the Republic of Croatia by means of geothermal energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 3429-3440.
    6. Yari, M. & Mehr, A.S. & Zare, V. & Mahmoudi, S.M.S. & Rosen, M.A., 2015. "Exergoeconomic comparison of TLC (trilateral Rankine cycle), ORC (organic Rankine cycle) and Kalina cycle using a low grade heat source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 712-722.
    7. Fischer, Johann, 2011. "Comparison of trilateral cycles and organic Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 6208-6219.
    8. Ho, Tony & Mao, Samuel S. & Greif, Ralph, 2012. "Increased power production through enhancements to the Organic Flash Cycle (OFC)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 686-695.
    9. Shengjun, Zhang & Huaixin, Wang & Tao, Guo, 2011. "Performance comparison and parametric optimization of subcritical Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) and transcritical power cycle system for low-temperature geothermal power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(8), pages 2740-2754, August.
    10. Li, Tailu & Zhu, Jialing & Hu, Kaiyong & Kang, Zhenhua & Zhang, Wei, 2014. "Implementation of PDORC (parallel double-evaporator organic Rankine cycle) to enhance power output in oilfield," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 680-687.
    11. Lai, Ngoc Anh & Wendland, Martin & Fischer, Johann, 2011. "Working fluids for high-temperature organic Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 199-211.
    12. Nian, Yong-Le & Cheng, Wen-Long, 2018. "Insights into geothermal utilization of abandoned oil and gas wells," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 44-60.
    13. Cavazzini, G. & Bari, S. & Pavesi, G. & Ardizzon, G., 2017. "A multi-fluid PSO-based algorithm for the search of the best performance of sub-critical Organic Rankine Cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 42-58.
    14. Ghasemi, Hadi & Paci, Marco & Tizzanini, Alessio & Mitsos, Alexander, 2013. "Modeling and optimization of a binary geothermal power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 412-428.
    15. Yang, Min-Hsiung & Yeh, Rong-Hua, 2016. "Economic performances optimization of an organic Rankine cycle system with lower global warming potential working fluids in geothermal application," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1201-1213.
    16. Tang, Hao & Wu, Huagen & Wang, Xiaolin & Xing, Ziwen, 2015. "Performance study of a twin-screw expander used in a geothermal organic Rankine cycle power generator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 631-642.
    17. Li, Tailu & Fu, Wencheng & Zhu, Jialing, 2014. "An integrated optimization for organic Rankine cycle based on entransy theory and thermodynamics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 561-573.
    18. Kharseh, Mohamad & Al-Khawaja, Mohammed & Hassani, Ferri, 2015. "Utilization of oil wells for electricity generation: Performance and economics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 910-916.
    19. Nami, Hossein & Anvari-Moghaddam, Amjad, 2020. "Small-scale CCHP systems for waste heat recovery from cement plants: Thermodynamic, sustainability and economic implications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    20. Chen, Huijuan & Goswami, D. Yogi & Stefanakos, Elias K., 2010. "A review of thermodynamic cycles and working fluids for the conversion of low-grade heat," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 3059-3067, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:35:y:2010:i:9:p:3578-3586. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.