IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v343y2026ics0360544225054052.html

Design of low carbon CO2-alternative-water injection processes using a machine-learning-assisted multi-objective optimization protocol

Author

Listed:
  • Shang, Wenlong
  • Sun, Qian
  • Li, Xiaobo
  • Wang, Ke
  • Ampomah, William

Abstract

Large-scale CCUS projects can generate considerable CO2 emissions during operational processes. However, very little attention has been paid to the CO2 emissions associated with the injection process itself for field scale CO2 enhanced oil recovery (EOR) projects. A notable contribution of this study is the incorporation of CO2 intensity into multi-objective optimization framework employing a thermodynamic variable exergy. This CO2 emission related metric is considered alongside cumulative oil production, CO2 storage capacity and net present value (NPV) to obtain a comprehensive strategy. A hybrid machine learning model that integrates deep neural networks (DNN) with support vector machine (SVM) is trained as the surrogate to the high-fidelity numerical simulator. Coupling with the NSGA-II optimizer, Pareto optimum set can be structured with non-dominating solutions considering the aforementioned objectives. The proposed optimization workflow is implemented to a benchmark CO2 water alternative gas (WAG) project and investigate the compromise relationships among objectives. A weighted scoring criteria is employed to screen the Pareto optimum set and identify the most practical scenarios. Results show that compared with the original development strategy, the best scoring solution achieves a 37 % increase in cumulative oil production and enhances CO2 storage by 38.4 million metric tonnes. Moreover, average CO2 emissions per kilogram of CO2 injected or per cubic meter of water injected are reduced from 0.053 kg to 0.029 kg achieving a 45 % reduction, with the NPV increased by 47.36 %. The proposed optimization strategy offers a practical solution toward low-carbon and efficient field development.

Suggested Citation

  • Shang, Wenlong & Sun, Qian & Li, Xiaobo & Wang, Ke & Ampomah, William, 2026. "Design of low carbon CO2-alternative-water injection processes using a machine-learning-assisted multi-objective optimization protocol," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 343(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:343:y:2026:i:c:s0360544225054052
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.139762
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225054052
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2025.139762?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vanessa Núñez-López & Ramón Gil-Egui & Seyyed A. Hosseini, 2019. "Environmental and Operational Performance of CO 2 -EOR as a CCUS Technology: A Cranfield Example with Dynamic LCA Considerations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Marco Marozzi & Mario Bolzan & Simone Di Zio, 2024. "Robust weighted aggregation of expert opinions in futures studies," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(3), pages 1471-1493, November.
    3. Tapia, John Frederick D. & Lee, Jui-Yuan & Ooi, Raymond E.H. & Foo, Dominic C.Y. & Tan, Raymond R., 2016. "Optimal CO2 allocation and scheduling in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) operations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 337-345.
    4. Luca Riboldi & Steve Völler & Magnus Korpås & Lars O. Nord, 2019. "An Integrated Assessment of the Environmental and Economic Impact of Offshore Oil Platform Electrification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-21, June.
    5. You, Junyu & Ampomah, William & Sun, Qian, 2020. "Co-optimizing water-alternating-carbon dioxide injection projects using a machine learning assisted computational framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    6. Ampomah, W. & Balch, R.S. & Cather, M. & Will, R. & Gunda, D. & Dai, Z. & Soltanian, M.R., 2017. "Optimum design of CO2 storage and oil recovery under geological uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 80-92.
    7. Eftekhari, Ali Akbar & Van Der Kooi, Hedzer & Bruining, Hans, 2012. "Exergy analysis of underground coal gasification with simultaneous storage of carbon dioxide," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 729-745.
    8. Sudipta Chatterjee & Kuo-Wei Huang, 2020. "Unrealistic energy and materials requirement for direct air capture in deep mitigation pathways," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-3, December.
    9. Fengshuang Du & Bahareh Nojabaei, 2019. "A Review of Gas Injection in Shale Reservoirs: Enhanced Oil/Gas Recovery Approaches and Greenhouse Gas Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-33, June.
    10. Mohammad S. Masnadi & Adam R. Brandt, 2017. "Climate impacts of oil extraction increase significantly with oilfield age," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 7(8), pages 551-556, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sun, Alexander Y., 2020. "Optimal carbon storage reservoir management through deep reinforcement learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    2. Dai, Zhenxue & Zhang, Ye & Bielicki, Jeffrey & Amooie, Mohammad Amin & Zhang, Mingkan & Yang, Changbing & Zou, Youqin & Ampomah, William & Xiao, Ting & Jia, Wei & Middleton, Richard & Zhang, Wen & Sun, 2018. "Heterogeneity-assisted carbon dioxide storage in marine sediments," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 876-883.
    3. Abdoli, B. & Hooshmand, F. & MirHassani, S.A., 2023. "A novel stochastic programming model under endogenous uncertainty for the CCS-EOR planning problem," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 338(C).
    4. Chen, Bailian & Harp, Dylan R. & Lin, Youzuo & Keating, Elizabeth H. & Pawar, Rajesh J., 2018. "Geologic CO2 sequestration monitoring design: A machine learning and uncertainty quantification based approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 332-345.
    5. Wang, Xiao & van ’t Veld, Klaas & Marcy, Peter & Huzurbazar, Snehalata & Alvarado, Vladimir, 2018. "Economic co-optimization of oil recovery and CO2 sequestration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 132-147.
    6. Xiao, Ting & Chen, Ting & Ma, Zhiwei & Tian, Hailong & Meguerdijian, Saro & Chen, Bailian & Pawar, Rajesh & Huang, Lianjie & Xu, Tianfu & Cather, Martha & McPherson, Brian, 2024. "A review of risk and uncertainty assessment for geologic carbon storage," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PB).
    7. Ajoma, Emmanuel & Saira, & Sungkachart, Thanarat & Ge, Jiachao & Le-Hussain, Furqan, 2020. "Water-saturated CO2 injection to improve oil recovery and CO2 storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    8. Oghare Victor Ogidiama & Tariq Shamim, 2021. "Assessment of CO2 capture technologies for CO2 utilization in enhanced oil recovery," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 11(3), pages 432-444, June.
    9. Shen, Bin & Yang, Shenglai & Hu, Jiangtao & Zhang, Yiqi & Zhang, Lingfeng & Ye, Shanlin & Yang, Zhengze & Yu, Jiayi & Gao, Xinyuan & Zhao, Ermeng, 2024. "Interpretable causal-based temporal graph convolutional network framework in complex spatio-temporal systems for CCUS-EOR," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    10. Migo-Sumagang, Maria Victoria & Tan, Raymond R. & Aviso, Kathleen B., 2023. "A multi-period model for optimizing negative emission technology portfolios with economic and carbon value discount rates," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    11. Ayomikun Bello & Anastasia Ivanova & Alexey Cheremisin, 2023. "A Comprehensive Review of the Role of CO 2 Foam EOR in the Reduction of Carbon Footprint in the Petroleum Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-20, January.
    12. You, Junyu & Ampomah, William & Sun, Qian, 2020. "Co-optimizing water-alternating-carbon dioxide injection projects using a machine learning assisted computational framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    13. Oliva, I. & Ventura, M., 2024. "Who can benefit from multi-license oil concessionaires valuation?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    14. Xiaolong, Chen & Yiqiang, Li & Xiang, Tang & Huan, Qi & Xuebing, Sun & Jianghao, Luo, 2021. "Effect of gravity segregation on CO2 flooding under various pressure conditions: Application to CO2 sequestration and oil production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    15. Wang, Sijia & Jiang, Lanlan & Cheng, Zucheng & Liu, Yu & Zhao, Jiafei & Song, Yongchen, 2021. "Experimental study on the CO2-decane displacement front behavior in high permeability sand evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    16. Prabu, V. & Geeta, K., 2015. "CO2 enhanced in-situ oxy-coal gasification based carbon-neutral conventional power generating systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 672-683.
    17. Samin Raziperchikolaee & Ashwin Pasumarti & Srikanta Mishra, 2020. "The effect of natural fractures on CO2 storage performance and oil recovery from CO2 and WAG injection in an Appalachian basin reservoir," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 10(5), pages 1098-1114, October.
    18. Turgay Ertekin & Qian Sun, 2019. "Artificial Intelligence Applications in Reservoir Engineering: A Status Check," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-22, July.
    19. Jin, Lu & Hawthorne, Steven & Sorensen, James & Pekot, Lawrence & Kurz, Bethany & Smith, Steven & Heebink, Loreal & Herdegen, Volker & Bosshart, Nicholas & Torres, José & Dalkhaa, Chantsalmaa & Peters, 2017. "Advancing CO2 enhanced oil recovery and storage in unconventional oil play—Experimental studies on Bakken shales," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 171-183.
    20. Christopher Otto & Thomas Kempka, 2015. "Thermo-Mechanical Simulations of Rock Behavior in Underground Coal Gasification Show Negligible Impact of Temperature-Dependent Parameters on Permeability Changes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-28, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:343:y:2026:i:c:s0360544225054052. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.