Author
Listed:
- Shang, Wenlong
- Sun, Qian
- Li, Xiaobo
- Wang, Ke
- Ampomah, William
Abstract
Large-scale CCUS projects can generate considerable CO2 emissions during operational processes. However, very little attention has been paid to the CO2 emissions associated with the injection process itself for field scale CO2 enhanced oil recovery (EOR) projects. A notable contribution of this study is the incorporation of CO2 intensity into multi-objective optimization framework employing a thermodynamic variable exergy. This CO2 emission related metric is considered alongside cumulative oil production, CO2 storage capacity and net present value (NPV) to obtain a comprehensive strategy. A hybrid machine learning model that integrates deep neural networks (DNN) with support vector machine (SVM) is trained as the surrogate to the high-fidelity numerical simulator. Coupling with the NSGA-II optimizer, Pareto optimum set can be structured with non-dominating solutions considering the aforementioned objectives. The proposed optimization workflow is implemented to a benchmark CO2 water alternative gas (WAG) project and investigate the compromise relationships among objectives. A weighted scoring criteria is employed to screen the Pareto optimum set and identify the most practical scenarios. Results show that compared with the original development strategy, the best scoring solution achieves a 37 % increase in cumulative oil production and enhances CO2 storage by 38.4 million metric tonnes. Moreover, average CO2 emissions per kilogram of CO2 injected or per cubic meter of water injected are reduced from 0.053 kg to 0.029 kg achieving a 45 % reduction, with the NPV increased by 47.36 %. The proposed optimization strategy offers a practical solution toward low-carbon and efficient field development.
Suggested Citation
Shang, Wenlong & Sun, Qian & Li, Xiaobo & Wang, Ke & Ampomah, William, 2026.
"Design of low carbon CO2-alternative-water injection processes using a machine-learning-assisted multi-objective optimization protocol,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 343(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:343:y:2026:i:c:s0360544225054052
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.139762
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:343:y:2026:i:c:s0360544225054052. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.