IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v279y2023ics0360544223014706.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigation of energy, exergy, and economy of co-generation system of solar electricity and cooling using linear parabolic collector for a data center

Author

Listed:
  • Alipour, Mehran
  • Deymi-Dashtebayaz, Mahdi
  • Asadi, Mostafa

Abstract

At present, data centers serve as primary providers of information technology infrastructure, thereby consuming a significant quantity of electrical energy. Considering the growing trend of heightened electricity consumption and heat generation within data centers, leading to increased expenses, coupled with mounting attention to energy preservation and ecological preservation, the deployment of electricity generation systems and solar cooling technologies presents an alluring solution. The present study introduces an integrated system powered by a parabolic collector, an organic Rankine cycle, and a two-effect absorption chiller. A solar parabolic collector system was evaluated as a potential means of providing thermal energy to the power generation and cooling systems. The methodology employed in this study involved the utilization of an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) to produce electricity while the cooling generation process was carried out using an absorption cycle. The optimization of both the absorption system and the ORC was performed utilizing the temperature data derived from the parabolic collector. Ultimately, a contrastive analysis was conducted to explore the correlation between cooling storage and electrical power depending on the degree of the parabolic collector. The collective expenditure for electricity and cooling system maintenance within the data center amounts to 1202392 USD. Based on an analysis of the associated expenses for electricity and cooling, the Payback Period (PBP) is determined to be 3.407 years, whereas the Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) stands at 0.05815 $ per kilowatt hour. The proposed system underwent an annual assessment encompassing analysis of performance, as well as considerations of the pertinent factors of energy, economics, and the environment. The findings indicate that the utilization of this system can mitigate the release of 1421 metric tons of carbon dioxide annually. The suggested amalgamated framework that couples solar power generation and cooling system holds immense promise in the realm of sustainable development. This optimism stems from the notable advantages of energy conservation, prospective economic benefits, and eco-friendliness that the system embodies.

Suggested Citation

  • Alipour, Mehran & Deymi-Dashtebayaz, Mahdi & Asadi, Mostafa, 2023. "Investigation of energy, exergy, and economy of co-generation system of solar electricity and cooling using linear parabolic collector for a data center," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:279:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223014706
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.128076
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544223014706
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2023.128076?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, X.R. & Yamaguchi, H. & Fujima, K. & Enomoto, M. & Sawada, N., 2007. "Theoretical analysis of a thermodynamic cycle for power and heat production using supercritical carbon dioxide," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 591-599.
    2. Tayyeban, Edris & Deymi-Dashtebayaz, Mahdi & Gholizadeh, Mohammad, 2021. "Investigation of a new heat recovery system for simultaneously producing power, cooling and distillate water," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    3. Hekmatshoar, Maziyar & Deymi-Dashtebayaz, Mahdi & Gholizadeh, Mohammad & Dadpour, Daryoush & Delpisheh, Mostafa, 2022. "Thermoeconomic analysis and optimization of a geothermal-driven multi-generation system producing power, freshwater, and hydrogen," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    4. Ahmadi, Pouria & Dincer, Ibrahim & Rosen, Marc A., 2013. "Development and assessment of an integrated biomass-based multi-generation energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 155-166.
    5. Deymi-Dashtebayaz, Mahdi & Norani, Marziye, 2021. "Sustainability assessment and emergy analysis of employing the CCHP system under two different scenarios in a data center," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    6. Madhawa Hettiarachchi, H.D. & Golubovic, Mihajlo & Worek, William M. & Ikegami, Yasuyuki, 2007. "Optimum design criteria for an Organic Rankine cycle using low-temperature geothermal heat sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(9), pages 1698-1706.
    7. Rong, Huigui & Zhang, Haomin & Xiao, Sheng & Li, Canbing & Hu, Chunhua, 2016. "Optimizing energy consumption for data centers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 674-691.
    8. Liu, Bo-Tau & Chien, Kuo-Hsiang & Wang, Chi-Chuan, 2004. "Effect of working fluids on organic Rankine cycle for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(8), pages 1207-1217.
    9. Dabwan, Yousef N. & Pei, Gang, 2020. "A novel integrated solar gas turbine trigeneration system for production of power, heat and cooling: Thermodynamic-economic-environmental analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 925-941.
    10. Akrami, Ehsan & Chitsaz, Ata & Nami, Hossein & Mahmoudi, S.M.S., 2017. "Energetic and exergoeconomic assessment of a multi-generation energy system based on indirect use of geothermal energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 625-639.
    11. Sun, Xiaoqin & Zhang, Quan & Medina, Mario A. & Liu, Yingjun & Liao, Shuguang, 2014. "A study on the use of phase change materials (PCMs) in combination with a natural cold source for space cooling in telecommunications base stations (TBSs) in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 95-103.
    12. Kim, Young Min & Shin, Dong Gil & Kim, Chang Gi & Cho, Gyu Baek, 2016. "Single-loop organic Rankine cycles for engine waste heat recovery using both low- and high-temperature heat sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 482-494.
    13. Ghorbani, Sh. & Khoshgoftar-Manesh, M.H. & Nourpour, M. & Blanco-Marigorta, A.M., 2020. "Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses of an integrated SOFC-GT-ORC hybrid system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ding, Xingqi & Zhou, Yufei & Duan, Liqiang & Li, Da & Zheng, Nan, 2023. "Comprehensive performance investigation of a novel solar-assisted liquid air energy storage system with different operating modes in different seasons," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ghavami, Morteza & Gholizadeh, Mohammad & Deymi-Dashtebayaz, Mahdi, 2023. "Parametric study and optimization analysis of a multi-generation system using waste heat in natural gas refinery- an energy and exergoeconomic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    2. Guo, T. & Wang, H.X. & Zhang, S.J., 2011. "Fluids and parameters optimization for a novel cogeneration system driven by low-temperature geothermal sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 2639-2649.
    3. Chen, Huijuan & Goswami, D. Yogi & Stefanakos, Elias K., 2010. "A review of thermodynamic cycles and working fluids for the conversion of low-grade heat," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 3059-3067, December.
    4. Bao, Junjiang & Zhao, Li, 2012. "Exergy analysis and parameter study on a novel auto-cascade Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 539-547.
    5. Hong Gao & Chao Liu & Chao He & Xiaoxiao Xu & Shuangying Wu & Yourong Li, 2012. "Performance Analysis and Working Fluid Selection of a Supercritical Organic Rankine Cycle for Low Grade Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(9), pages 1-15, August.
    6. Kheir Abadi, Majid & Davoodi, Vajihe & Deymi-Dashtebayaz, Mahdi & Ebrahimi-Moghadam, Amir, 2023. "Determining the best scenario for providing electrical, cooling, and hot water consuming of a building with utilizing a novel wind/solar-based hybrid system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    7. Feng, Yongqiang & Zhang, Yaning & Li, Bingxi & Yang, Jinfu & Shi, Yang, 2015. "Sensitivity analysis and thermoeconomic comparison of ORCs (organic Rankine cycles) for low temperature waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 664-677.
    8. Shengjun, Zhang & Huaixin, Wang & Tao, Guo, 2011. "Performance comparison and parametric optimization of subcritical Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) and transcritical power cycle system for low-temperature geothermal power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(8), pages 2740-2754, August.
    9. Li, Tailu & Zhu, Jialing & Hu, Kaiyong & Kang, Zhenhua & Zhang, Wei, 2014. "Implementation of PDORC (parallel double-evaporator organic Rankine cycle) to enhance power output in oilfield," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 680-687.
    10. Anahita Moharamian & Saeed Soltani & Faramarz Ranjbar & Mortaza Yari & Marc A Rosen, 2017. "Thermodynamic analysis of a wall mounted gas boiler with an organic Rankine cycle and hydrogen production unit," Energy & Environment, , vol. 28(7), pages 725-743, November.
    11. Subiantoro, Alison & Ooi, Kim Tiow, 2014. "Comparison and performance analysis of the novel revolving vane expander design variants in low and medium pressure applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 747-757.
    12. Nian, Yong-Le & Cheng, Wen-Long, 2018. "Insights into geothermal utilization of abandoned oil and gas wells," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 44-60.
    13. Cavazzini, G. & Bari, S. & Pavesi, G. & Ardizzon, G., 2017. "A multi-fluid PSO-based algorithm for the search of the best performance of sub-critical Organic Rankine Cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 42-58.
    14. Baccioli, A. & Antonelli, M. & Desideri, U., 2017. "Technical and economic analysis of organic flash regenerative cycles (OFRCs) for low temperature waste heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 69-87.
    15. Yin, Hebi & Sabau, Adrian S. & Conklin, James C. & McFarlane, Joanna & Qualls, A. Lou, 2013. "Mixtures of SF6–CO2 as working fluids for geothermal power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 243-253.
    16. Imran, Muhammad & Haglind, Fredrik & Asim, Muhammad & Zeb Alvi, Jahan, 2018. "Recent research trends in organic Rankine cycle technology: A bibliometric approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 552-562.
    17. Ge, Zhong & Wang, Hua & Wang, Hui-Tao & Wang, Jian-Jun & Li, Ming & Wu, Fu-Zhong & Zhang, Song-Yuan, 2015. "Main parameters optimization of regenerative organic Rankine cycle driven by low-temperature flue gas waste heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 1886-1895.
    18. Ghasemi, Hadi & Paci, Marco & Tizzanini, Alessio & Mitsos, Alexander, 2013. "Modeling and optimization of a binary geothermal power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 412-428.
    19. Yang, Min-Hsiung & Yeh, Rong-Hua, 2016. "Economic performances optimization of an organic Rankine cycle system with lower global warming potential working fluids in geothermal application," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1201-1213.
    20. Tang, Hao & Wu, Huagen & Wang, Xiaolin & Xing, Ziwen, 2015. "Performance study of a twin-screw expander used in a geothermal organic Rankine cycle power generator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 631-642.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:279:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223014706. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.