IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v5y2012i9p3233-3247d19777.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance Analysis and Working Fluid Selection of a Supercritical Organic Rankine Cycle for Low Grade Waste Heat Recovery

Author

Listed:
  • Hong Gao

    (Key Laboratory of Low-grade Energy Utilization Technologies and Systems of Ministry of Education, College of Power Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China)

  • Chao Liu

    (Key Laboratory of Low-grade Energy Utilization Technologies and Systems of Ministry of Education, College of Power Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China)

  • Chao He

    (Key Laboratory of Low-grade Energy Utilization Technologies and Systems of Ministry of Education, College of Power Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China)

  • Xiaoxiao Xu

    (Key Laboratory of Low-grade Energy Utilization Technologies and Systems of Ministry of Education, College of Power Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China)

  • Shuangying Wu

    (Key Laboratory of Low-grade Energy Utilization Technologies and Systems of Ministry of Education, College of Power Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China)

  • Yourong Li

    (Key Laboratory of Low-grade Energy Utilization Technologies and Systems of Ministry of Education, College of Power Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China)

Abstract

The performance analysis of a supercritical organic Rankine cycle system driven by exhaust heat using 18 organic working fluids is presented. Several parameters, such as the net power output, exergy efficiency, expander size parameter ( SP ), and heat exchanger requirement of evaporator and the condenser, were used to evaluate the performance of this recovery cycle and screen the working fluids. The results reveal that in most cases, raising the expander inlet temperature is helpful to improve the net power output and the exergy efficiency. However, the effect of the expander inlet pressure on those parameters is related to the expander inlet temperature and working fluid used. Either lower expander inlet temperature and pressure, or higher expander inlet temperature and pressure, generally makes the net power output more. Lower expander inlet temperature results in larger total heat transfer requirement and expander size. According to the screening criteria of both the higher output and the lower investment, the following working fluids for the supercritical ORC system are recommended: R152a and R143a.

Suggested Citation

  • Hong Gao & Chao Liu & Chao He & Xiaoxiao Xu & Shuangying Wu & Yourong Li, 2012. "Performance Analysis and Working Fluid Selection of a Supercritical Organic Rankine Cycle for Low Grade Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(9), pages 1-15, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:5:y:2012:i:9:p:3233-3247:d:19777
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/5/9/3233/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/5/9/3233/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, X.R. & Yamaguchi, H. & Fujima, K. & Enomoto, M. & Sawada, N., 2007. "Theoretical analysis of a thermodynamic cycle for power and heat production using supercritical carbon dioxide," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 591-599.
    2. Zhang, Xin-Rong & Yamaguchi, Hiroshi & Uneno, Daisuke, 2007. "Experimental study on the performance of solar Rankine system using supercritical CO2," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(15), pages 2617-2628.
    3. Badr, O. & O'Callaghan, P. W. & Probert, S. D., 1985. "Thermodynamic and thermophysical properties of organic working fluids for Rankine-cycle engines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 1-40.
    4. Chen, Huijuan & Goswami, D. Yogi & Rahman, Muhammad M. & Stefanakos, Elias K., 2011. "A supercritical Rankine cycle using zeotropic mixture working fluids for the conversion of low-grade heat into power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 549-555.
    5. Wang, Z.Q. & Zhou, N.J. & Guo, J. & Wang, X.Y., 2012. "Fluid selection and parametric optimization of organic Rankine cycle using low temperature waste heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 107-115.
    6. Madhawa Hettiarachchi, H.D. & Golubovic, Mihajlo & Worek, William M. & Ikegami, Yasuyuki, 2007. "Optimum design criteria for an Organic Rankine cycle using low-temperature geothermal heat sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(9), pages 1698-1706.
    7. Yamamoto, Takahisa & Furuhata, Tomohiko & Arai, Norio & Mori, Koichi, 2001. "Design and testing of the Organic Rankine Cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 239-251.
    8. Liu, Bo-Tau & Chien, Kuo-Hsiang & Wang, Chi-Chuan, 2004. "Effect of working fluids on organic Rankine cycle for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(8), pages 1207-1217.
    9. Chen, Huijuan & Goswami, D. Yogi & Stefanakos, Elias K., 2010. "A review of thermodynamic cycles and working fluids for the conversion of low-grade heat," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 3059-3067, December.
    10. Saleh, Bahaa & Koglbauer, Gerald & Wendland, Martin & Fischer, Johann, 2007. "Working fluids for low-temperature organic Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1210-1221.
    11. Schuster, A. & Karellas, S. & Aumann, R., 2010. "Efficiency optimization potential in supercritical Organic Rankine Cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 1033-1039.
    12. Hung, T.C. & Shai, T.Y. & Wang, S.K., 1997. "A review of organic rankine cycles (ORCs) for the recovery of low-grade waste heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 22(7), pages 661-667.
    13. Pan, Lisheng & Wang, Huaixin & Shi, Weixiu, 2012. "Performance analysis in near-critical conditions of organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 281-286.
    14. He, Chao & Liu, Chao & Gao, Hong & Xie, Hui & Li, Yourong & Wu, Shuangying & Xu, Jinliang, 2012. "The optimal evaporation temperature and working fluids for subcritical organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 136-143.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Chao & He, Chao & Gao, Hong & Xie, Hui & Li, Yourong & Wu, Shuangying & Xu, Jinliang, 2013. "The environmental impact of organic Rankine cycle for waste heat recovery through life-cycle assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 144-154.
    2. Bao, Junjiang & Zhao, Li, 2013. "A review of working fluid and expander selections for organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 325-342.
    3. Ghasemi, Hadi & Paci, Marco & Tizzanini, Alessio & Mitsos, Alexander, 2013. "Modeling and optimization of a binary geothermal power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 412-428.
    4. Li, Tailu & Zhu, Jialing & Hu, Kaiyong & Kang, Zhenhua & Zhang, Wei, 2014. "Implementation of PDORC (parallel double-evaporator organic Rankine cycle) to enhance power output in oilfield," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 680-687.
    5. Dai, Baomin & Li, Minxia & Ma, Yitai, 2014. "Thermodynamic analysis of carbon dioxide blends with low GWP (global warming potential) working fluids-based transcritical Rankine cycles for low-grade heat energy recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 942-952.
    6. Li, Tailu & Fu, Wencheng & Zhu, Jialing, 2014. "An integrated optimization for organic Rankine cycle based on entransy theory and thermodynamics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 561-573.
    7. Lecompte, S. & Huisseune, H. & van den Broek, M. & De Paepe, M., 2015. "Methodical thermodynamic analysis and regression models of organic Rankine cycle architectures for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 60-76.
    8. Guo, T. & Wang, H.X. & Zhang, S.J., 2011. "Fluids and parameters optimization for a novel cogeneration system driven by low-temperature geothermal sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 2639-2649.
    9. Chen, Huijuan & Goswami, D. Yogi & Stefanakos, Elias K., 2010. "A review of thermodynamic cycles and working fluids for the conversion of low-grade heat," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 3059-3067, December.
    10. Steven Lecompte & Sanne Lemmens & Henk Huisseune & Martijn Van den Broek & Michel De Paepe, 2015. "Multi-Objective Thermo-Economic Optimization Strategy for ORCs Applied to Subcritical and Transcritical Cycles for Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-28, April.
    11. Kuo, Chi-Ron & Hsu, Sung-Wei & Chang, Kai-Han & Wang, Chi-Chuan, 2011. "Analysis of a 50kW organic Rankine cycle system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 5877-5885.
    12. Ayachi, Fadhel & Boulawz Ksayer, Elias & Zoughaib, Assaad & Neveu, Pierre, 2014. "ORC optimization for medium grade heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 47-56.
    13. Tchanche, Bertrand F. & Lambrinos, Gr. & Frangoudakis, A. & Papadakis, G., 2011. "Low-grade heat conversion into power using organic Rankine cycles – A review of various applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(8), pages 3963-3979.
    14. He, Chao & Liu, Chao & Zhou, Mengtong & Xie, Hui & Xu, Xiaoxiao & Wu, Shuangying & Li, Yourong, 2014. "A new selection principle of working fluids for subcritical organic Rankine cycle coupling with different heat sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 283-291.
    15. Cavazzini, G. & Bari, S. & Pavesi, G. & Ardizzon, G., 2017. "A multi-fluid PSO-based algorithm for the search of the best performance of sub-critical Organic Rankine Cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 42-58.
    16. Ge, Zhong & Wang, Hua & Wang, Hui-Tao & Wang, Jian-Jun & Li, Ming & Wu, Fu-Zhong & Zhang, Song-Yuan, 2015. "Main parameters optimization of regenerative organic Rankine cycle driven by low-temperature flue gas waste heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 1886-1895.
    17. Sarkar, Jahar, 2015. "Review and future trends of supercritical CO2 Rankine cycle for low-grade heat conversion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 434-451.
    18. Wang, E.H. & Zhang, H.G. & Fan, B.Y. & Ouyang, M.G. & Zhao, Y. & Mu, Q.H., 2011. "Study of working fluid selection of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3406-3418.
    19. Ayachi, Fadhel & Ksayer, Elias Boulawz & Neveu, Pierre & Zoughaib, Assaad, 2016. "Experimental investigation and modeling of a hermetic scroll expander," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 256-267.
    20. Roy, J.P. & Misra, Ashok, 2012. "Parametric optimization and performance analysis of a regenerative Organic Rankine Cycle using R-123 for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 227-235.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:5:y:2012:i:9:p:3233-3247:d:19777. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.