IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v206y2020ics0360544220312585.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses of an integrated SOFC-GT-ORC hybrid system

Author

Listed:
  • Ghorbani, Sh.
  • Khoshgoftar-Manesh, M.H.
  • Nourpour, M.
  • Blanco-Marigorta, A.M.

Abstract

In this study, an optimal design and analysis of an integrated internal reforming Solid Oxide fuel cell (IRSOFC) - Gas Turbine (GT) – Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) system are investigated. R407C and R404A as ORC working fluids are used to produce the additional power based on the recovery of the flue gases in the ORC. A thermodynamic simulation of the integrated system has been performed to evaluate the performance of the proposed cycle. In this regard, exergetic, exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses have been done for a better understanding of the interaction between the components and the overall system. In order to carry out the exergoenvironmental analysis, the environmental impacts obtained by Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) are apportioned to the exergy streams. The analysis of this integrated system has been carried out by using computer code in MATLAB. A Multi-Objective Water Cycle Algorithm based on the maximization of overall exergy efficiency and minimization of total exergetic cost rate and total exergetic environmental impacts was performed to find optimum design variables for the proposed system. The results show that R407C has the best thermodynamic performance and with this organic fluid the overall energy and exergy efficiencies for the proposed optimum system are 49.42% and 46.83% respectively. Furthermore, the exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental main optimum parameters are comprised and evaluated.

Suggested Citation

  • Ghorbani, Sh. & Khoshgoftar-Manesh, M.H. & Nourpour, M. & Blanco-Marigorta, A.M., 2020. "Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses of an integrated SOFC-GT-ORC hybrid system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:206:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220312585
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118151
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544220312585
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118151?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Choudhury, Arnab & Chandra, H. & Arora, A., 2013. "Application of solid oxide fuel cell technology for power generation—A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 430-442.
    2. Badur, Janusz & Lemański, Marcin & Kowalczyk, Tomasz & Ziółkowski, Paweł & Kornet, Sebastian, 2018. "Zero-dimensional robust model of an SOFC with internal reforming for hybrid energy cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 128-138.
    3. Lee, Young Duk & Ahn, Kook Young & Morosuk, Tatiana & Tsatsaronis, George, 2015. "Environmental impact assessment of a solid-oxide fuel-cell-based combined-heat-and-power-generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 455-466.
    4. Cavalcanti, Eduardo José Cidade, 2017. "Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses of an integrated solar combined cycle system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 507-519.
    5. Habka, Muhsen & Ajib, Salman, 2015. "Evaluation of mixtures performances in Organic Rankine Cycle when utilizing the geothermal water with and without cogeneration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 567-576.
    6. Boyano, A. & Blanco-Marigorta, A.M. & Morosuk, T. & Tsatsaronis, G., 2011. "Exergoenvironmental analysis of a steam methane reforming process for hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 2202-2214.
    7. Meyer, Lutz & Tsatsaronis, George & Buchgeister, Jens & Schebek, Liselotte, 2009. "Exergoenvironmental analysis for evaluation of the environmental impact of energy conversion systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 75-89.
    8. Denver F. Cheddie, 2010. "Integration of A Solid Oxide Fuel Cell into A 10 MW Gas Turbine Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-16, April.
    9. Cavalcanti, Eduardo J.C. & Carvalho, Monica & B. Azevedo, Jonathan L., 2019. "Exergoenvironmental results of a eucalyptus biomass-fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    10. Ding, Yang & Liu, Chao & Zhang, Cheng & Xu, Xiaoxiao & Li, Qibin & Mao, Lianfei, 2018. "Exergoenvironmental model of Organic Rankine Cycle system including the manufacture and leakage of working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 52-64.
    11. Cuneo, A. & Zaccaria, V. & Tucker, D. & Sorce, A., 2018. "Gas turbine size optimization in a hybrid system considering SOFC degradation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 855-864.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gürbüz, Emine Yağız & Güler, Onur Vahip & Keçebaş, Ali, 2022. "Environmental impact assessment of a real geothermal driven power plant with two-stage ORC using enhanced exergo-environmental analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 1110-1123.
    2. Balli, Ozgur & Kale, Utku & Rohács, Dániel & Hikmet Karakoc, T., 2022. "Environmental damage cost and exergoenvironmental evaluations of piston prop aviation engines for the landing and take-off flight phases," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    3. Huang, Yue & Zhu, Lin & He, Yangdong & Wang, Yuan & Hao, Qiang & Zhu, Yifei, 2023. "Carbon dioxide utilization based on exergoenvironmental sustainability assessment: A case study of CO2 hydrogenation to methanol," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    4. Aldair Benavides Gamero & Josué Camargo Vanegas & Jorge Duarte Forero & Guillermo Valencia Ochoa & Rafael Diaz Herazo, 2023. "Advanced Exergo-Environmental Assessments of an Organic Rankine Cycle as Waste Heat Recovery System from a Natural Gas Engine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-29, March.
    5. Huang, Yue & Zhu, Lin & He, Yangdong & Zeng, Xingyan & Wang, Yuan & Hao, Qiang & Zhang, Chaoli & Zhu, Yifei, 2024. "Exergoenvironment evaluation of carbon resource conversion and utilization via CO2 direct hydrogenation for methanol and power cogeneration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    6. Lee, Young Duk & Ahn, Kook Young & Morosuk, Tatiana & Tsatsaronis, George, 2018. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic evaluation of an SOFC-Engine hybrid power generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 810-822.
    7. Mehrabian, M.J. & Khoshgoftar Manesh, M.H., 2023. "4E, risk, diagnosis, and availability evaluation for optimal design of a novel biomass-solar-wind driven polygeneration system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P2).
    8. Nikiforakis, Ioannis & Mamalis, Sotirios & Assanis, Dimitris, 2025. "Understanding Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Hybridization: A Critical Review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 377(PC).
    9. Yang, Kun & He, Yiyun & Du, Na & Yan, Ping & Zhu, Neng & Chen, Yuzhu & Wang, Jun & Lund, Peter D., 2024. "Exergy, exergoeconomic, and exergoenvironmental analyses of novel solar- and biomass-driven trigeneration system integrated with organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    10. Rocha, Danilo H.D. & Siqueira, Diana S. & Silva, Rogério J., 2021. "Exergoenvironmental analysis for evaluating coal-fired power plants technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    11. Khoshgoftar Manesh, M.H. & Navid, P. & Blanco Marigorta, A.M. & Amidpour, M. & Hamedi, M.H., 2013. "New procedure for optimal design and evaluation of cogeneration system based on advanced exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 314-333.
    12. Restrepo, Álvaro & Miyake, Raphael & Kleveston, Fábio & Bazzo, Edson, 2012. "Exergetic and environmental analysis of a pulverized coal power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 195-202.
    13. Petrakopoulou, Fontina & Tsatsaronis, George & Morosuk, Tatiana & Paitazoglou, Christopher, 2012. "Environmental evaluation of a power plant using conventional and advanced exergy-based methods," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 23-30.
    14. Holl, Mario & Pelz, Peter F., 2016. "Multi-pole system analysis (MPSA) – A systematic method towards techno-economic optimal system design," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 937-949.
    15. Atılgan, Ramazan & Turan, Önder & Altuntaş, Önder & Aydın, Hakan & Synylo, Kateryna, 2013. "Environmental impact assessment of a turboprop engine with the aid of exergy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 664-671.
    16. Blanco-Marigorta, Ana M. & Masi, Marco & Manfrida, Giampaolo, 2014. "Exergo-environmental analysis of a reverse osmosis desalination plant in Gran Canaria," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 223-232.
    17. Kanoglu, Mehmet & Ayanoglu, Abdulkadir & Abusoglu, Aysegul, 2011. "Exergoeconomic assessment of a geothermal assisted high temperature steam electrolysis system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 4422-4433.
    18. Tanveer, Waqas Hassan & Abdelkareem, Mohammad Ali & Kolosz, Ben W. & Rezk, Hegazy & Andresen, John & Cha, Suk Won & Sayed, Enas Taha, 2021. "The role of vacuum based technologies in solid oxide fuel cell development to utilize industrial waste carbon for power production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    19. Wang, Qingqiang & Hou, Jili & Wei, Xing & Jin, Nan & Ma, Yue & Li, Shuyuan & Zhao, Yuchao, 2022. "Advanced exergoenvironmental analysis of the oil shale retorting process with SJ-type rectangular retort," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    20. Keçebaş, Ali, 2016. "Exergoenvironmental analysis for a geothermal district heating system: An application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 391-400.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:206:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220312585. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.