IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v202y2020ics0360544220308331.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Natural gas liquefaction using the high-pressure potential in the gas transmission system

Author

Listed:
  • Pajączek, Krzysztof
  • Kostowski, Wojciech
  • Stanek, Wojciech

Abstract

This article concerns natural gas liquefaction using high-pressure potential, which is available in pressure letdown stations. The article proposes an integration of a pressure letdown station with a natural gas liquefaction line which enables partial exergy recovery and decreasing natural resources consumption to produce LNG. Exergy recovery is carried out by a replacement of the pressure reduction valve by a turboexpander, which can recover exergy from high-pressure natural gas flowing through a pressure reduction stage. The recovered energy may be used to drive a natural gas liquefaction unit, coupled with the reduction station. A case study concerning an existing pressure letdown station includes two chosen model of a turboexpanders with low and high internal efficiency and several natural gas liquefaction units possible to integrate. The varying size of the liquefaction unit corresponds to a different degree of utilization of energy generated in the expander. Turboexpander produces electric power supplying the liquefaction unit, however, it requires the use of additional energy to heat the gas before the reduction stage, which increases the thermoecologic cost of natural gas transferred to distribution network. Energy, exergy and thermoecological cost analysis was carried out for three system design configurations and for six sizes of the liquefaction line with different turboexpander efficiency. The first configuration included a basic configuration with the pressure letdown station and the liquefaction unit, the second configuration also included an integration with a waste heat source (ICE exhaust gases), and the third configuration used multi-stage expansion. Energy efficiency of the integrated expansion-liquefaction system varies from 35.40% to 66.64%, while its exergy efficiency ranges from 15.75% to 46.33% depending on the size of the liquefaction unit and the gas liquefaction method. It was proved that it is possible to reduce thermo-ecological cost of LNG by 8.2%. Reducing raw material consumption needed for LNG production increases natural gas thermo-ecological cost by only 1%. A preliminary economic analysis based on prices of energy carriers was done. It was found that the boundary price was estimated at 0.0246 €/kWh for one of chosen systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Pajączek, Krzysztof & Kostowski, Wojciech & Stanek, Wojciech, 2020. "Natural gas liquefaction using the high-pressure potential in the gas transmission system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:202:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220308331
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117726
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544220308331
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117726?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kostowski, Wojciech J. & Usón, Sergio, 2013. "Thermoeconomic assessment of a natural gas expansion system integrated with a co-generation unit," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 58-66.
    2. He, T.B. & Ju, Y.L., 2014. "A novel process for small-scale pipeline natural gas liquefaction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 17-24.
    3. Cascio, Ermanno Lo & Ma, Zhenjun & Schenone, Corrado, 2018. "Performance assessment of a novel natural gas pressure reduction station equipped with parabolic trough solar collectors," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(PA), pages 177-187.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Meng, Yang & Zhang, Yicheng & Wang, Junxin & Chen, Shuangtao & Hou, Yu & Chen, Liang, 2023. "Performance optimization of turboexpander-compressors for energy recovery in small air-separation plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    2. Song, Rui & Sun, Shuyu & Liu, Jianjun & Yang, Chunhe, 2021. "Pore scale modeling on dissociation and transportation of methane hydrate in porous sediments," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    3. Krzywanski, J. & Czakiert, T. & Nowak, W. & Shimizu, T. & Zylka, A. & Idziak, K. & Sosnowski, M. & Grabowska, K., 2022. "Gaseous emissions from advanced CLC and oxyfuel fluidized bed combustion of coal and biomass in a complex geometry facility:A comprehensive model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    4. Song, Rui & Liu, Jianjun & Yang, Chunhe & Sun, Shuyu, 2022. "Study on the multiphase heat and mass transfer mechanism in the dissociation of methane hydrate in reconstructed real-shape porous sediments," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).
    5. Liu, Yang & Cao, Xuewen & Guo, Dan & Cao, Hengguang & Bian, Jiang, 2023. "Influence of shock wave/boundary layer interaction on condensation flow and energy recovery in supersonic nozzle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Chenghao & Zheng, Siyang & Chen, Yufeng & Zeng, Zhiyong, 2021. "Proposal and parametric analysis of an innovative natural gas pressure reduction and liquefaction system for efficient exergy recovery and LNG storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    2. Lo Cascio, Ermanno & De Schutter, Bart & Schenone, Corrado, 2018. "Flexible energy harvesting from natural gas distribution networks through line-bagging," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 253-263.
    3. Yao, Sheng & Zhang, Yufeng & Deng, Na & Yu, Xiaohui & Dong, Shengming, 2019. "Performance research on a power generation system using twin-screw expanders for energy recovery at natural gas pressure reduction stations under off-design conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 1218-1230.
    4. Yao, Sheng & Zhang, Yufeng & Yu, Xiaohui, 2018. "Thermo-economic analysis of a novel power generation system integrating a natural gas expansion plant with a geothermal ORC in Tianjin, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 602-614.
    5. Uwitonze, Hosanna & Chaniago, Yus Donald & Lim, Hankwon, 2022. "Novel integrated energy-efficient dual-effect single mixed refrigerant and NGLs recovery process for small-scale natural gas processing plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    6. Yin, Liang & Ju, Yonglin, 2020. "Conceptual design and analysis of a novel process for BOG re-liquefaction combined with absorption refrigeration cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    7. Tian, Yafen & Xing, Ziwen & He, Zhilong & Wu, Huagen, 2017. "Modeling and performance analysis of twin-screw steam expander under fluctuating operating conditions in steam pipeline pressure energy recovery applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 692-701.
    8. Gaetano Morgese & Francesco Fornarelli & Paolo Oresta & Tommaso Capurso & Michele Stefanizzi & Sergio M. Camporeale & Marco Torresi, 2020. "Fast Design Procedure for Turboexpanders in Pressure Energy Recovery Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-26, July.
    9. Luis F. Villalón-López & Víctor M. Ambriz-Díaz & Carlos Rubio-Maya & Oscar Chávez & Israel Y. Rosas, 2024. "Energy, Exergy, Exergoeconomic Analysis, and Optimization in a Natural Gas Decompression Station with a Vortex Tube and Geothermal Preheating," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-33, February.
    10. Kim, Juwon & Seo, Youngkyun & Chang, Daejun, 2016. "Economic evaluation of a new small-scale LNG supply chain using liquid nitrogen for natural-gas liquefaction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 154-163.
    11. Ning, Jinghong & Sun, Zhili & Dong, Qiang & Liu, Xinghua, 2019. "Performance study of supplying cooling load and output power combined cycle using the cold energy of the small scale LNG," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 36-44.
    12. Guoqiang Li & Yuting Wu & Yeqiang Zhang & Ruiping Zhi & Jingfu Wang & Chongfang Ma, 2016. "Performance Study on a Single-Screw Expander for a Small-Scale Pressure Recovery System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    13. Davide Borelli & Francesco Devia & Ermanno Lo Cascio & Corrado Schenone & Alessandro Spoladore, 2016. "Combined Production and Conversion of Energy in an Urban Integrated System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-17, October.
    14. El Ghazzani, Badreddine & Martinez Plaza, Diego & Ait El Cadi, Radia & Ihlal, Ahmed & Abnay, Brahim & Bouabid, Khalid, 2017. "Thermal plant based on parabolic trough collectors for industrial process heat generation in Morocco," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1261-1275.
    15. Xu, Xiao & Cai, Liang & Chen, Tao & Zhan, Zhixing, 2021. "Analysis and optimization of a natural gas multi-stage expansion plant integrated with a gas engine-driven heat pump," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    16. Guo, Hao & Tang, Qixiong & Gong, Maoqiong & Cheng, Kuiwei, 2018. "Optimization of a novel liquefaction process based on Joule–Thomson cycle utilizing high-pressure natural gas exergy by genetic algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 696-706.
    17. Shokati, Naser & Ranjbar, Faramarz & Yari, Mortaza, 2015. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of basic, dual-pressure and dual-fluid ORCs and Kalina geothermal power plants: A comparative study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 527-542.
    18. Wang, Xucen & Li, Min & Cai, Liuxi & Li, Yun, 2020. "Propane and iso-butane pre-cooled mixed refrigerant liquefaction process for small-scale skid-mounted natural gas liquefaction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    19. Paweł Bielka & Szymon Kuczyński, 2022. "Energy Recovery from Natural Gas Pressure Reduction Stations with the Use of Turboexpanders: Static and Dynamic Simulations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-19, November.
    20. Olfati, Mohammad & Bahiraei, Mehdi & Nazari, Saeed & Veysi, Farzad, 2020. "A comprehensive assessment of low-temperature preheating process in natural gas pressure reduction stations to better benefit from solar energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:202:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220308331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.