IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v7y2015i12p15841-16719d60826.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Waste Energy Recovery from Natural Gas Distribution Network: CELSIUS Project Demonstrator in Genoa

Author

Listed:
  • Davide Borelli

    (DIME—Dipartimento di Ingegneria Meccanica, Energetica, Gestionale e dei Trasporti, Università degli Studi di Genova, Via All’Opera Pia 15/A, 16145 Genova, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Francesco Devia

    (DIME—Dipartimento di Ingegneria Meccanica, Energetica, Gestionale e dei Trasporti, Università degli Studi di Genova, Via All’Opera Pia 15/A, 16145 Genova, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Margherita Marré Brunenghi

    (DIME—Dipartimento di Ingegneria Meccanica, Energetica, Gestionale e dei Trasporti, Università degli Studi di Genova, Via All’Opera Pia 15/A, 16145 Genova, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Corrado Schenone

    (DIME—Dipartimento di Ingegneria Meccanica, Energetica, Gestionale e dei Trasporti, Università degli Studi di Genova, Via All’Opera Pia 15/A, 16145 Genova, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Alessandro Spoladore

    (DIME—Dipartimento di Ingegneria Meccanica, Energetica, Gestionale e dei Trasporti, Università degli Studi di Genova, Via All’Opera Pia 15/A, 16145 Genova, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

Increasing energy efficiency by the smart recovery of waste energy is the scope of the CELSIUS Project (Combined Efficient Large Scale Integrated Urban Systems). The CELSIUS consortium includes a world-leading partnership of outstanding research, innovation and implementation organizations, and gather competence and excellence from five European cities with complementary baseline positions regarding the sustainable use of energy: Cologne, Genoa, Gothenburg, London, and Rotterdam. Lasting four-years and coordinated by the City of Gothenburg, the project faces with an holistic approach technical, economic, administrative, social, legal and political issues concerning smart district heating and cooling, aiming to establish best practice solutions. This will be done through the implementation of twelve new high-reaching demonstration projects, which cover the most major aspects of innovative urban heating and cooling for a smart city. The Genoa demonstrator was designed in order to recover energy from the pressure drop between the main supply line and the city natural gas network. The potential mechanical energy is converted to electricity by a turboexpander/generator system, which has been integrated in a combined heat and power plant to supply a district heating network. The performed energy analysis assessed natural gas saving and greenhouse gas reduction achieved through the smart systems integration.

Suggested Citation

  • Davide Borelli & Francesco Devia & Margherita Marré Brunenghi & Corrado Schenone & Alessandro Spoladore, 2015. "Waste Energy Recovery from Natural Gas Distribution Network: CELSIUS Project Demonstrator in Genoa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-17, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:12:p:15841-16719:d:60826
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/12/15841/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/12/15841/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kelly, Scott & Pollitt, Michael, 2010. "An assessment of the present and future opportunities for combined heat and power with district heating (CHP-DH) in the United Kingdom," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(11), pages 6936-6945, November.
    2. Kostowski, Wojciech J. & Usón, Sergio, 2013. "Thermoeconomic assessment of a natural gas expansion system integrated with a co-generation unit," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 58-66.
    3. Kristina Mjörnell & Anna Boss & Markus Lindahl & Stefan Molnar, 2014. "A Tool to Evaluate Different Renovation Alternatives with Regard to Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(7), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Sheila M. Olmstead & Robert N. Stavins, 2012. "Three Key Elements of a Post-2012 International Climate Policy Architecture," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 6(1), pages 65-85.
    5. Lund, H. & Möller, B. & Mathiesen, B.V. & Dyrelund, A., 2010. "The role of district heating in future renewable energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 1381-1390.
    6. Mallikarjun, Sreekanth & Lewis, Herbert F., 2014. "Energy technology allocation for distributed energy resources: A strategic technology-policy framework," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 783-799.
    7. Bisio, G., 1995. "Thermodynamic analysis of the use of pressure exergy of natural gas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 161-167.
    8. Orehounig, Kristina & Evins, Ralph & Dorer, Viktor, 2015. "Integration of decentralized energy systems in neighbourhoods using the energy hub approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 277-289.
    9. Allegrini, Jonas & Orehounig, Kristina & Mavromatidis, Georgios & Ruesch, Florian & Dorer, Viktor & Evins, Ralph, 2015. "A review of modelling approaches and tools for the simulation of district-scale energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1391-1404.
    10. Yang, Yun & Zhang, Shijie & Xiao, Yunhan, 2015. "Optimal design of distributed energy resource systems coupled with energy distribution networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 433-448.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Szymon Kuczyński & Mariusz Łaciak & Andrzej Olijnyk & Adam Szurlej & Tomasz Włodek, 2019. "Techno-Economic Assessment of Turboexpander Application at Natural Gas Regulation Stations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Shouxiang Wang & Shuangchen Yuan, 2019. "Interval Energy Flow Analysis in Integrated Electrical and Natural-Gas Systems Considering Uncertainties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-19, May.
    3. Cascio, Ermanno Lo & Ma, Zhenjun & Schenone, Corrado, 2018. "Performance assessment of a novel natural gas pressure reduction station equipped with parabolic trough solar collectors," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(PA), pages 177-187.
    4. O. Saied & A. Abdellatif & S. Shaaban & A. F. Elsafty, 2022. "Efficient Energy Recovery Scenarios from Pressure-Reducing Stations Intended for New Al-Alamein City in Egypt," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Yahya Sheikhnejad & João Simões & Nelson Martins, 2020. "Energy Harvesting by a Novel Substitution for Expansion Valves: Special Focus on City Gate Stations of High-Pressure Natural Gas Pipelines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Lo Cascio, Ermanno & Von Friesen, Marc Puig & Schenone, Corrado, 2018. "Optimal retrofitting of natural gas pressure reduction stations for energy recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 387-399.
    7. Davide Borelli & Francesco Devia & Ermanno Lo Cascio & Corrado Schenone & Alessandro Spoladore, 2016. "Combined Production and Conversion of Energy in an Urban Integrated System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-17, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sayegh, M.A. & Danielewicz, J. & Nannou, T. & Miniewicz, M. & Jadwiszczak, P. & Piekarska, K. & Jouhara, H., 2017. "Trends of European research and development in district heating technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P2), pages 1183-1192.
    2. Mohammadi, Mohammad & Noorollahi, Younes & Mohammadi-ivatloo, Behnam & Yousefi, Hossein, 2017. "Energy hub: From a model to a concept – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1512-1527.
    3. Davide Borelli & Francesco Devia & Ermanno Lo Cascio & Corrado Schenone & Alessandro Spoladore, 2016. "Combined Production and Conversion of Energy in an Urban Integrated System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Morvaj, Boran & Evins, Ralph & Carmeliet, Jan, 2016. "Optimising urban energy systems: Simultaneous system sizing, operation and district heating network layout," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P1), pages 619-636.
    5. Waibel, Christoph & Evins, Ralph & Carmeliet, Jan, 2019. "Co-simulation and optimization of building geometry and multi-energy systems: Interdependencies in energy supply, energy demand and solar potentials," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 1661-1682.
    6. Nutkiewicz, Alex & Yang, Zheng & Jain, Rishee K., 2018. "Data-driven Urban Energy Simulation (DUE-S): A framework for integrating engineering simulation and machine learning methods in a multi-scale urban energy modeling workflow," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 1176-1189.
    7. Prasanna, Ashreeta & Dorer, Viktor & Vetterli, Nadège, 2017. "Optimisation of a district energy system with a low temperature network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 632-648.
    8. Zhang, Xingxing & Lovati, Marco & Vigna, Ilaria & Widén, Joakim & Han, Mengjie & Gal, Csilla & Feng, Tao, 2018. "A review of urban energy systems at building cluster level incorporating renewable-energy-source (RES) envelope solutions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 1034-1056.
    9. Ambrose, Aimee & Eadson, Will & Pinder, James, 2016. "The role of actor-networks in the early stage mobilisation of low carbon heat networks," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 144-152.
    10. Wirtz, Marco & Kivilip, Lukas & Remmen, Peter & Müller, Dirk, 2020. "5th Generation District Heating: A novel design approach based on mathematical optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    11. Scheller, Fabian & Bruckner, Thomas, 2019. "Energy system optimization at the municipal level: An analysis of modeling approaches and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 444-461.
    12. Popovski, Eftim & Aydemir, Ali & Fleiter, Tobias & Bellstädt, Daniel & Büchele, Richard & Steinbach, Jan, 2019. "The role and costs of large-scale heat pumps in decarbonising existing district heating networks – A case study for the city of Herten in Germany," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 918-933.
    13. Guoqiang Li & Yuting Wu & Yeqiang Zhang & Ruiping Zhi & Jingfu Wang & Chongfang Ma, 2016. "Performance Study on a Single-Screw Expander for a Small-Scale Pressure Recovery System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    14. Alberto Fichera & Mattia Frasca & Rosaria Volpe, 2020. "A cost-based approach for evaluating the impact of a network of distributed energy systems on the centralized energy supply," Energy & Environment, , vol. 31(1), pages 77-87, February.
    15. Miocic, Johannes M. & Krecher, Marc, 2022. "Estimation of shallow geothermal potential to meet building heating demand on a regional scale," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 629-640.
    16. Falke, Tobias & Krengel, Stefan & Meinerzhagen, Ann-Kathrin & Schnettler, Armin, 2016. "Multi-objective optimization and simulation model for the design of distributed energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1508-1516.
    17. Melchiorre Casisi & Stefano Costanzo & Piero Pinamonti & Mauro Reini, 2018. "Two-Level Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization of a District Heating System with Distributed Cogeneration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, December.
    18. Lake, Andrew & Rezaie, Behanz & Beyerlein, Steven, 2017. "Review of district heating and cooling systems for a sustainable future," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 417-425.
    19. Mavromatidis, Georgios & Orehounig, Kristina & Carmeliet, Jan, 2018. "A review of uncertainty characterisation approaches for the optimal design of distributed energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 258-277.
    20. Wakui, Tetsuya & Hashiguchi, Moe & Sawada, Kento & Yokoyama, Ryohei, 2019. "Two-stage design optimization based on artificial immune system and mixed-integer linear programming for energy supply networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 1228-1248.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:12:p:15841-16719:d:60826. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.