IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i4p1669-d1340795.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy, Exergy, Exergoeconomic Analysis, and Optimization in a Natural Gas Decompression Station with a Vortex Tube and Geothermal Preheating

Author

Listed:
  • Luis F. Villalón-López

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, “W” Building, Central Campus, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Morelia 58030, Michoacán, Mexico)

  • Víctor M. Ambriz-Díaz

    (Tecnológico Nacional de México/I. T. Chihuahua, Av. Tecnológico, 2909, Chihuahua 31310, Chihuahua, Mexico)

  • Carlos Rubio-Maya

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, “W” Building, Central Campus, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Morelia 58030, Michoacán, Mexico)

  • Oscar Chávez

    (Tecnológico Nacional de México/I. T. Chihuahua, Av. Tecnológico, 2909, Chihuahua 31310, Chihuahua, Mexico)

  • Israel Y. Rosas

    (Tecnológico Nacional de México/I. T. Chihuahua, Av. Tecnológico, 2909, Chihuahua 31310, Chihuahua, Mexico)

Abstract

Natural gas stations require a preheating stage to prevent the formation of hydrates inside of them provoked by a sudden decompression process of the natural gas. The preheating process has been investigated to improve efficiency and to reduce costs as well. This work studies the behavior of a natural gas decompression station with a first-stage preheating process using a vortex tube and a geothermal heat exchanger, followed by a second stage involving a water bath heater (heating vat). An energetic, exergetic, and exergoeconomic study has been carried out based on a mathematical model and the theory of exergetic cost, obtaining key thermodynamic and thermoeconomic variables, including exergy flows and equipment costs. A heat flow of 26.41 kW was obtained in the geothermal preheating stage; meanwhile, a 60.43 kW heat flow was obtained in the heating vat. The results showed a saving in station fuel using only 2.046% of the natural gas in the system at the second preheating stage. Also, the system was optimized, obtaining a 15.73% reduction in the decompressed natural gas cost. These findings show the possibility of implementing these systems in zones with many geothermal resources to reach a constant, profitable natural gas supply in areas where a pipeline network does not exist.

Suggested Citation

  • Luis F. Villalón-López & Víctor M. Ambriz-Díaz & Carlos Rubio-Maya & Oscar Chávez & Israel Y. Rosas, 2024. "Energy, Exergy, Exergoeconomic Analysis, and Optimization in a Natural Gas Decompression Station with a Vortex Tube and Geothermal Preheating," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-33, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1669-:d:1340795
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1669/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1669/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kostowski, Wojciech J. & Usón, Sergio, 2013. "Thermoeconomic assessment of a natural gas expansion system integrated with a co-generation unit," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 58-66.
    2. Arabkoohsar, A. & Farzaneh-Gord, M. & Deymi-Dashtebayaz, M. & Machado, L. & Koury, R.N.N., 2015. "A new design for natural gas pressure reduction points by employing a turbo expander and a solar heating set," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 239-250.
    3. Sanaye, Sepehr & Mohammadi Nasab, Amir, 2012. "Modeling and optimizing a CHP system for natural gas pressure reduction plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 358-369.
    4. Lozano, M.A. & Valero, A., 1993. "Theory of the exergetic cost," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 18(9), pages 939-960.
    5. Esmaeilpour, Morteza & Gholami Korzani, Maziar & Kohl, Thomas, 2023. "Stochastic performance assessment on long-term behavior of multilateral closed deep geothermal systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 26-35.
    6. McClean, A. & Pedersen, O.W., 2023. "The role of regulation in geothermal energy in the UK," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu, Xiao & Cai, Liang & Chen, Tao & Zhan, Zhixing, 2021. "Analysis and optimization of a natural gas multi-stage expansion plant integrated with a gas engine-driven heat pump," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    2. Lo Cascio, Ermanno & De Schutter, Bart & Schenone, Corrado, 2018. "Flexible energy harvesting from natural gas distribution networks through line-bagging," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 253-263.
    3. Li, Chenghao & Zheng, Siyang & Chen, Yufeng & Zeng, Zhiyong, 2021. "Proposal and parametric analysis of an innovative natural gas pressure reduction and liquefaction system for efficient exergy recovery and LNG storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    4. Lo Cascio, Ermanno & Von Friesen, Marc Puig & Schenone, Corrado, 2018. "Optimal retrofitting of natural gas pressure reduction stations for energy recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 387-399.
    5. Xiong, Yaxuan & An, Shuo & Xu, Peng & Ding, Yulong & Li, Chuan & Zhang, Qunli & Chen, Hongbing, 2018. "A novel expander-depending natural gas pressure regulation configuration: Performance analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 21-35.
    6. Tian, Yafen & Xing, Ziwen & He, Zhilong & Wu, Huagen, 2017. "Modeling and performance analysis of twin-screw steam expander under fluctuating operating conditions in steam pipeline pressure energy recovery applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 692-701.
    7. Guoqiang Li & Yuting Wu & Yeqiang Zhang & Ruiping Zhi & Jingfu Wang & Chongfang Ma, 2016. "Performance Study on a Single-Screw Expander for a Small-Scale Pressure Recovery System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    8. Kostowski, Wojciech J. & Usón, Sergio & Stanek, Wojciech & Bargiel, Paweł, 2014. "Thermoecological cost of electricity production in the natural gas pressure reduction process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 10-18.
    9. Jannatabadi, Mohsen & Farzaneh-Gord, Mahmood & Rahbari, Hamid Reza & Nersi, Abolfazl, 2018. "Energy and exergy analysis of reciprocating natural gas expansion engine based on valve configurations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 986-1000.
    10. Yahya Sheikhnejad & João Simões & Nelson Martins, 2020. "Energy Harvesting by a Novel Substitution for Expansion Valves: Special Focus on City Gate Stations of High-Pressure Natural Gas Pipelines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    11. Lee, Sehyeok & Kim, Dohoon & Ha, Honggeun & Kim, Min Soo, 2023. "Pressure energy recovery of LNG integrated with multi-stage feedwater fuel preheaters in a combined cycle power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    12. Cascio, Ermanno Lo & Ma, Zhenjun & Schenone, Corrado, 2018. "Performance assessment of a novel natural gas pressure reduction station equipped with parabolic trough solar collectors," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(PA), pages 177-187.
    13. Alparslan Neseli, Mehmet & Ozgener, Onder & Ozgener, Leyla, 2017. "Thermo-mechanical exergy analysis of Marmara Eregli natural gas pressure reduction station (PRS): An application," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 80-88.
    14. Ghezelbash, Reza & Farzaneh-Gord, Mahmood & Behi, Hamidreza & Sadi, Meisam & Khorramabady, Heshmatollah Shams, 2015. "Performance assessment of a natural gas expansion plant integrated with a vertical ground-coupled heat pump," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 2503-2517.
    15. Beretta, Gian Paolo & Iora, Paolo & Ghoniem, Ahmed F., 2014. "Allocating resources and products in multi-hybrid multi-cogeneration: What fractions of heat and power are renewable in hybrid fossil-solar CHP?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 587-603.
    16. Lukas Kriechbaum & Philipp Gradl & Romeo Reichenhauser & Thomas Kienberger, 2020. "Modelling Grid Constraints in a Multi-Energy Municipal Energy System Using Cumulative Exergy Consumption Minimisation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-23, July.
    17. Gad, M.S. & Uysal, Cuneyt & El-Shafay, A.S. & Ağbulut, Ümit, 2024. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic assessments of a diesel engine fuelled with waste chicken fat biodiesel-diesel blends," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    18. Kwak, H.-Y. & Kim, D.-J. & Jeon, J.-S., 2003. "Exergetic and thermoeconomic analyses of power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 343-360.
    19. Khaljani, M. & Khoshbakhti Saray, R. & Bahlouli, K., 2015. "Thermodynamic and thermoeconomic optimization of an integrated gas turbine and organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 2136-2145.
    20. Wang, Xurong & Yang, Yi & Zheng, Ya & Dai, Yiping, 2017. "Exergy and exergoeconomic analyses of a supercritical CO2 cycle for a cogeneration application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 971-982.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1669-:d:1340795. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.