IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v194y2020ics0360544219325502.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Techno-economic analysis of ultra-supercritical power plants using air- and oxy-combustion circulating fluidized bed with and without CO2 capture

Author

Listed:
  • Vu, Thang Toan
  • Lim, Young-Il
  • Song, Daesung
  • Mun, Tae-Young
  • Moon, Ji-Hong
  • Sun, Dowon
  • Hwang, Yoon-Tae
  • Lee, Jae-Goo
  • Park, Young Cheol

Abstract

The adoption of oxy-combustion in a circulating fluidized bed (CFB) producing ultra-supercritical (USC) steam has been investigated to increase energy efficiency and reduce CO2 emissions of coal-fired power plants. This paper presents a techno-economic analysis for 500 MWe USC-CFB power plants with air- and oxy-combustion in the presence of CO2 capture. An amine absorber unit (AAU) and a CO2 processing unit (CPU) were used to capture CO2 in the air- and oxy-combustion power plants, respectively. The air-combustion power plant without CO2 capture (Case 1) showed the highest net electricity efficiency (46%), whereas the introduction of an AAU in the air-combustion power plant (Case 2) reduced the net efficiency to 36%. The net efficiency (39%) of the oxy-combustion power plant with CPU (Case 3) was higher than that of Case 2 owing to the recycling of hot flue gas. The levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) of Case 3 (59 $/MWh) was lower than that of Case 2 (64 $/MWh), which demonstrated that oxy-combustion was advantageous compared to air-combustion in a scenario with CO2 capture. The sensitivity analyses of the electricity price and CO2 credit showed economic situations where Cases 2 and 3 would be profitable.

Suggested Citation

  • Vu, Thang Toan & Lim, Young-Il & Song, Daesung & Mun, Tae-Young & Moon, Ji-Hong & Sun, Dowon & Hwang, Yoon-Tae & Lee, Jae-Goo & Park, Young Cheol, 2020. "Techno-economic analysis of ultra-supercritical power plants using air- and oxy-combustion circulating fluidized bed with and without CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:194:y:2020:i:c:s0360544219325502
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116855
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544219325502
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116855?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Do, Truong Xuan & Lim, Young-il & Yeo, Heejung & Lee, Uen-do & Choi, Young-tai & Song, Jae-hun, 2014. "Techno-economic analysis of power plant via circulating fluidized-bed gasification from woodchips," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 547-560.
    2. Pettinau, Alberto & Ferrara, Francesca & Amorino, Carlo, 2013. "Combustion vs. gasification for a demonstration CCS (carbon capture and storage) project in Italy: A techno-economic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 160-169.
    3. Yin, Chungen & Yan, Jinyue, 2016. "Oxy-fuel combustion of pulverized fuels: Combustion fundamentals and modeling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 742-762.
    4. Moon, Ji-Hong & Jo, Sung-Ho & Park, Sung Jin & Khoi, Nguyen Hoang & Seo, Myung Won & Ra, Ho Won & Yoon, Sang-Jun & Yoon, Sung-Min & Lee, Jae-Goo & Mun, Tae-Young, 2019. "Carbon dioxide purity and combustion characteristics of oxy firing compared to air firing in a pilot-scale circulating fluidized bed," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 183-192.
    5. Oboirien, B.O. & North, B.C. & Kleyn, T., 2014. "Techno-economic assessments of oxy-fuel technology for South African coal-fired power stations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 550-555.
    6. Goto, Kazuya & Yogo, Katsunori & Higashii, Takayuki, 2013. "A review of efficiency penalty in a coal-fired power plant with post-combustion CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 710-720.
    7. Oh, Se-Young & Yun, Seokwon & Kim, Jin-Kuk, 2018. "Process integration and design for maximizing energy efficiency of a coal-fired power plant integrated with amine-based CO2 capture process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 311-322.
    8. Hagi, Hayato & Le Moullec, Yann & Nemer, Maroun & Bouallou, Chakib, 2014. "Performance assessment of first generation oxy-coal power plants through an exergy-based process integration methodology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 272-284.
    9. Larsson, Simon & Fantazzini, Dean & Davidsson, Simon & Kullander, Sven & Höök, Mikael, 2014. "Reviewing electricity production cost assessments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 170-183.
    10. Feyzi, Vafa & Beheshti, Masoud & Gharibi Kharaji, Abolfazl, 2017. "Exergy analysis: A CO2 removal plant using a-MDEA as the solvent," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 77-84.
    11. Lee, See Hoon & Lee, Tae Hee & Jeong, Sang Mun & Lee, Jong Min, 2019. "Economic analysis of a 600 mwe ultra supercritical circulating fluidized bed power plant based on coal tax and biomass co-combustion plans," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 121-127.
    12. Agbor, Ezinwa & Oyedun, Adetoyese Olajire & Zhang, Xiaolei & Kumar, Amit, 2016. "Integrated techno-economic and environmental assessments of sixty scenarios for co-firing biomass with coal and natural gas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 433-449.
    13. Do, Truong Xuan & Lim, Young-il & Cho, Hyodeuk & Shim, Jaehui & Yoo, Jeongkeun & Rho, Kyutai & Choi, Seong-Geun & Park, Chanwoo & Park, Byeong-Yun, 2018. "Techno-economic analysis of fry-drying and torrefaction plant for bio-solid fuel production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 45-53.
    14. Do, Truong Xuan & Lim, Young-il, 2016. "Techno-economic comparison of three energy conversion pathways from empty fruit bunches," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 307-318.
    15. Li, Bao-Hong & Zhang, Nan & Smith, Robin, 2016. "Simulation and analysis of CO2 capture process with aqueous monoethanolamine solution," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 707-717.
    16. Pettinau, Alberto & Ferrara, Francesca & Tola, Vittorio & Cau, Giorgio, 2017. "Techno-economic comparison between different technologies for CO2-free power generation from coal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 426-439.
    17. Hanak, Dawid P. & Powell, Dante & Manovic, Vasilije, 2017. "Techno-economic analysis of oxy-combustion coal-fired power plant with cryogenic oxygen storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 193-203.
    18. Espatolero, Sergio & Cortés, Cristóbal & Romeo, Luis M., 2010. "Optimization of boiler cold-end and integration with the steam cycle in supercritical units," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(5), pages 1651-1660, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Guoxuan & Wang, Shuai & Zhao, Jiangang & Qi, Huaqing & Ma, Zhaoyuan & Cui, Peizhe & Zhu, Zhaoyou & Gao, Jun & Wang, Yinglong, 2020. "Life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of biomass-to-hydrogen production with methane tri-reforming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    2. Branimir Tramošljika & Paolo Blecich & Igor Bonefačić & Vladimir Glažar, 2021. "Advanced Ultra-Supercritical Coal-Fired Power Plant with Post-Combustion Carbon Capture: Analysis of Electricity Penalty and CO 2 Emission Reduction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    3. Webb, Jeremy & de Silva, H. Nadeeka & Wilson, Clevo, 2020. "The future of coal and renewable power generation in Australia: A review of market trends," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 363-378.
    4. García-Luna, S. & Ortiz, C. & Carro, A. & Chacartegui, R. & Pérez-Maqueda, L.A., 2022. "Oxygen production routes assessment for oxy-fuel combustion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
    5. Fu, Yue & Wang, Liyuan & Liu, Ming & Wang, Jinshi & Yan, Junjie, 2023. "Performance analysis of coal-fired power plants integrated with carbon capture system under load-cycling operation conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    6. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Magiri-Skouloudi, Despina & Grimekis, Dimitrios & Karellas, Sotirios, 2020. "Εnergy-exergy analysis of ultra-supercritical biomass-fuelled steam power plants for industrial CHP, district heating and cooling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 252-269.
    7. Seo, Su Been & Kim, Hyung Woo & Kang, Seo Yeong & Go, Eun Sol & Keel, Sang In & Lee, See Hoon, 2021. "Techno-economic comparison between air-fired and oxy-fuel circulating fluidized bed power plants with ultra-supercritical cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    8. Ling, Jester Lih Jie & Oh, Seung Seok & Park, Hyun Jun & Lee, See Hoon, 2023. "Process simulation and economic evaluation of a biomass oxygen fuel circulating fluidized bed combustor with an indirect supercritical carbon dioxide cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Seo, Su Been & Kim, Hyung Woo & Kang, Seo Yeong & Go, Eun Sol & Keel, Sang In & Lee, See Hoon, 2021. "Techno-economic comparison between air-fired and oxy-fuel circulating fluidized bed power plants with ultra-supercritical cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    2. García-Luna, S. & Ortiz, C. & Carro, A. & Chacartegui, R. & Pérez-Maqueda, L.A., 2022. "Oxygen production routes assessment for oxy-fuel combustion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
    3. Pettinau, Alberto & Ferrara, Francesca & Tola, Vittorio & Cau, Giorgio, 2017. "Techno-economic comparison between different technologies for CO2-free power generation from coal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 426-439.
    4. Tafone, Alessio & Dal Magro, Fabio & Romagnoli, Alessandro, 2018. "Integrating an oxygen enriched waste to energy plant with cryogenic engines and Air Separation Unit: Technical, economic and environmental analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 423-432.
    5. Peter Viebahn & Emile J. L. Chappin, 2018. "Scrutinising the Gap between the Expected and Actual Deployment of Carbon Capture and Storage—A Bibliometric Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-45, September.
    6. Pereira, Luís M.C. & Llovell, Fèlix & Vega, Lourdes F., 2018. "Thermodynamic characterisation of aqueous alkanolamine and amine solutions for acid gas processing by transferable molecular models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 687-703.
    7. Ortiz, C. & Valverde, J.M. & Chacartegui, R. & Benítez-Guerrero, M. & Perejón, A. & Romeo, L.M., 2017. "The Oxy-CaL process: A novel CO2 capture system by integrating partial oxy-combustion with the Calcium-Looping process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 1-17.
    8. Alsanousie, Abdurrahman A. & Elsamni, Osama A. & Attia, Abdelhamid E. & Elhelw, Mohamed, 2021. "Transient and troubleshoots management of aged small-scale steam power plants using Aspen Plus Dynamics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    9. Do, Truong Xuan & Lim, Young-il, 2016. "Techno-economic comparison of three energy conversion pathways from empty fruit bunches," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 307-318.
    10. Calin-Cristian Cormos, 2018. "Techno-Economic Evaluations of Copper-Based Chemical Looping Air Separation System for Oxy-Combustion and Gasification Power Plants with Carbon Capture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.
    11. Janusz Kotowicz & Sebastian Michalski & Mateusz Brzęczek, 2019. "The Characteristics of a Modern Oxy-Fuel Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-34, September.
    12. Hagi, Hayato & Neveux, Thibaut & Le Moullec, Yann, 2015. "Efficiency evaluation procedure of coal-fired power plants with CO2 capture, cogeneration and hybridization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 306-323.
    13. Sefa Yalcin & Alp Er Ş. Konukman & Adnan Midilli, 2020. "A perspective on fossil fuel based flue gas emission reduction technologies," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 10(4), pages 664-677, August.
    14. López, R. & Menéndez, M. & Fernández, C. & Bernardo-Sánchez, A., 2018. "The effects of scale-up and coal-biomass blending on supercritical coal oxy-combustion power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 571-584.
    15. Chen, S.J. & Zhu, M. & Fu, Y. & Huang, Y.X. & Tao, Z.C. & Li, W.L., 2017. "Using 13X, LiX, and LiPdAgX zeolites for CO2 capture from post-combustion flue gas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 87-98.
    16. Anufriev, I.S., 2021. "Review of water/steam addition in liquid-fuel combustion systems for NOx reduction: Waste-to-energy trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    17. Do, Truong Xuan & Lim, Young-il & Cho, Hyodeuk & Shim, Jaehui & Yoo, Jeongkeun & Rho, Kyutai & Choi, Seong-Geun & Park, Chanwoo & Park, Byeong-Yun, 2018. "Techno-economic analysis of fry-drying and torrefaction plant for bio-solid fuel production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 45-53.
    18. Yi, Qun & Zhao, Yingjie & Huang, Yi & Wei, Guoqiang & Hao, Yanhong & Feng, Jie & Mohamed, Usama & Pourkashanian, Mohamed & Nimmo, William & Li, Wenying, 2018. "Life cycle energy-economic-CO2 emissions evaluation of biomass/coal, with and without CO2 capture and storage, in a pulverized fuel combustion power plant in the United Kingdom," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 258-272.
    19. Zhao, Ying-jie & Zhang, Yu-ke & Cui, Yang & Duan, Yuan-yuan & Huang, Yi & Wei, Guo-qiang & Mohamed, Usama & Shi, Li-juan & Yi, Qun & Nimmo, William, 2022. "Pinch combined with exergy analysis for heat exchange network and techno-economic evaluation of coal chemical looping combustion power plant with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    20. Lee, Jui-Yuan, 2017. "A multi-period optimisation model for planning carbon sequestration retrofits in the electricity sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 12-20.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:194:y:2020:i:c:s0360544219325502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.