IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v137y2017icp823-833.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Value of power plant flexibility in power systems with high shares of variable renewables: A scenario outlook for Germany 2035

Author

Listed:
  • Kopiske, Jakob
  • Spieker, Sebastian
  • Tsatsaronis, George

Abstract

As part of the German transition towards a low-carbon economy, renewable energies are set to account for more than half of the gross electricity consumption by 2035, resulting in a rising flexibility demand. Flexibility is required to balance fluctuations in the residual load. In addition, uncertainties in the wind and solar power generation cause an increased demand for control reserve. A unit commitment model of the German power system is used to analyze the value of power plant flexibility in systems with high shares of variable renewables. To investigate the value of power plant flexibility, the additional revenue that can be generated by flexibility improvements is calculated. The results indicate, that power plant flexibility has a small positive impact on the power plant's contribution margin in 2014. A future power system configuration according to the German Grid Development Plan would provide sufficient flexibility to integrate high shares of renewables without power plant flexibility being very valuable. However, integrating variable renewables into a system relying on coal-fired and nuclear power stations results in power plants being able to significantly increase their revenue with improved flexibility. Under these circumstances, power plant flexibility has a considerable value.

Suggested Citation

  • Kopiske, Jakob & Spieker, Sebastian & Tsatsaronis, George, 2017. "Value of power plant flexibility in power systems with high shares of variable renewables: A scenario outlook for Germany 2035," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 823-833.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:137:y:2017:i:c:p:823-833
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.04.138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544217307065
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2017.04.138?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kondziella, Hendrik & Bruckner, Thomas, 2016. "Flexibility requirements of renewable energy based electricity systems – a review of research results and methodologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 10-22.
    2. Alizadeh, M.I. & Parsa Moghaddam, M. & Amjady, N. & Siano, P. & Sheikh-El-Eslami, M.K., 2016. "Flexibility in future power systems with high renewable penetration: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1186-1193.
    3. Huber, Matthias & Dimkova, Desislava & Hamacher, Thomas, 2014. "Integration of wind and solar power in Europe: Assessment of flexibility requirements," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 236-246.
    4. Saarinen, Linn & Dahlbäck, Niklas & Lundin, Urban, 2015. "Power system flexibility need induced by wind and solar power intermittency on time scales of 1–14 days," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 339-344.
    5. Christidis, Andreas & Koch, Christoph & Pottel, Lothar & Tsatsaronis, George, 2012. "The contribution of heat storage to the profitable operation of combined heat and power plants in liberalized electricity markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 75-82.
    6. Schill, Wolf-Peter, 2014. "Residual Load, Renewable Surplus Generation and Storage Requirements in Germany," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 73, pages 65-79.
    7. Bertsch, Joachim & Growitsch, Christian & Lorenczik, Stefan & Nagl, Stephan, 2016. "Flexibility in Europe's power sector — An additional requirement or an automatic complement?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 118-131.
    8. George Liberopoulos & Panagiotis Andrianesis, 2016. "Critical Review of Pricing Schemes in Markets with Non-Convex Costs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 17-31, February.
    9. Denholm, Paul & Hand, Maureen, 2011. "Grid flexibility and storage required to achieve very high penetration of variable renewable electricity," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 1817-1830, March.
    10. O'Neill, Richard P. & Sotkiewicz, Paul M. & Hobbs, Benjamin F. & Rothkopf, Michael H. & Stewart, William R., 2005. "Efficient market-clearing prices in markets with nonconvexities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(1), pages 269-285, July.
    11. Hannele Holttinen, 2012. "Wind integration: experience, issues, and challenges," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(3), pages 243-255, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Engels, Jonas & Claessens, Bert & Deconinck, Geert, 2019. "Techno-economic analysis and optimal control of battery storage for frequency control services, applied to the German market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 1036-1049.
    2. Zhao, Yongning & Xu, Xiandong & Qadrdan, Meysam & Wu, Jianzhong, 2021. "Optimal operation of compressor units in gas networks to provide flexibility to power systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    3. Teirilä, Juha, 2020. "The value of the nuclear power plant fleet in the German power market under the expansion of fluctuating renewables," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    4. Ekata Kaushik & Vivek Prakash & Om Prakash Mahela & Baseem Khan & Almoataz Y. Abdelaziz & Junhee Hong & Zong Woo Geem, 2022. "Optimal Placement of Renewable Energy Generators Using Grid-Oriented Genetic Algorithm for Loss Reduction and Flexibility Improvement," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-20, March.
    5. Deng, Xu & Lv, Tao & Hou, Xiaoran & Xu, Jie & Pi, Duyang & Liu, Feng & Li, Na, 2022. "Regional disparity of flexibility options for integrating variable renewable energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 641-654.
    6. Yan, Rujing & Wang, Jiangjiang & Huo, Shuojie & Zhang, Jing & Tang, Saiqiu & Yang, Mei, 2023. "Comparative study for four technologies on flexibility improvement and renewable energy accommodation of combined heat and power system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    7. Yinhe Bu & Xingping Zhang, 2021. "On the Way to Integrate Increasing Shares of Variable Renewables in China: Experience from Flexibility Modification and Deep Peak Regulation Ancillary Service Market Based on MILP-UC Programming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, February.
    8. Panos, Evangelos & Kober, Tom & Wokaun, Alexander, 2019. "Long term evaluation of electric storage technologies vs alternative flexibility options for the Swiss energy system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.
    9. Liu, Ming & Wang, Shan & Yan, Junjie, 2021. "Operation scheduling of a coal-fired CHP station integrated with power-to-heat devices with detail CHP unit models by particle swarm optimization algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    10. Li, Haoyang & Lin, Wen, 2023. "Cheaper solar, cleaner grid?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(PB).
    11. Schwidtal, Jan Marc & Agostini, Marco & Coppo, Massimiliano & Bignucolo, Fabio & Lorenzoni, Arturo, 2023. "Optimized operation of distributed energy resources: The opportunities of value stacking for Power-to-Gas aggregated with PV," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
    12. Sha Liu & Jiong Shen, 2022. "Modeling of Large-Scale Thermal Power Plants for Performance Prediction in Deep Peak Shaving," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.
    13. Dianfa Wu & Zhiping Yang & Ningling Wang & Chengzhou Li & Yongping Yang, 2018. "An Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model and AHP Weighting Uncertainty Analysis for Sustainability Assessment of Coal-Fired Power Units," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-27, May.
    14. Li, Yanxue & Zhang, Xiaoyi & Gao, Weijun & Ruan, Yingjun, 2020. "Capacity credit and market value analysis of photovoltaic integration considering grid flexibility requirements," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 908-919.
    15. Liu, Ming & Wang, Shan & Zhao, Yongliang & Tang, Haiyu & Yan, Junjie, 2019. "Heat–power decoupling technologies for coal-fired CHP plants: Operation flexibility and thermodynamic performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    16. Xiaolong Yang & Dongxiao Niu & Meng Chen & Keke Wang & Qian Wang & Xiaomin Xu, 2020. "An Operation Benefit Analysis and Decision Model of Thermal Power Enterprises in China against the Background of Large-Scale New Energy Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-19, June.
    17. Wang, Zhu & Liu, Ming & Zhao, Yongliang & Wang, Chaoyang & Chong, Daotong & Yan, Junjie, 2020. "Flexibility and efficiency enhancement for double-reheat coal-fired power plants by control optimization considering boiler heat storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    18. Jakub Zezula, 2022. "Commodity risk hedging of a power producer: Case study of the Czech power market," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2022(1), pages 17-32.
    19. Yin, Guangzhi & Duan, Maosheng, 2022. "Pricing the deep peak regulation service of coal-fired power plants to promote renewable energy integration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    20. Guo, Zheyu & Zheng, Yanan & Li, Gengyin, 2020. "Power system flexibility quantitative evaluation based on improved universal generating function method: A case study of Zhangjiakou," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    21. Ye, Liang-Cheng & Lin, Hai Xiang & Tukker, Arnold, 2019. "Future scenarios of variable renewable energies and flexibility requirements for thermal power plants in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 708-714.
    22. Lauven, Lars-Peter & Geldermann, Jutta & Desideri, Umberto, 2019. "Estimating the revenue potential of flexible biogas plants in the power sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 402-410.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brunner, Christoph & Deac, Gerda & Braun, Sebastian & Zöphel, Christoph, 2020. "The future need for flexibility and the impact of fluctuating renewable power generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 1314-1324.
    2. Blanco, Herib & Faaij, André, 2018. "A review at the role of storage in energy systems with a focus on Power to Gas and long-term storage," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 1049-1086.
    3. Lukas Wienholt & Ulf Philipp Müller & Julian Bartels, 2018. "Optimal Sizing and Spatial Allocation of Storage Units in a High-Resolution Power System Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Andrychowicz, Mateusz & Olek, Blazej & Przybylski, Jakub, 2017. "Review of the methods for evaluation of renewable energy sources penetration and ramping used in the Scenario Outlook and Adequacy Forecast 2015. Case study for Poland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 703-714.
    5. Sinn, Hans-Werner, 2017. "Buffering volatility: A study on the limits of Germany's energy revolution," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 130-150.
    6. Stinner, Sebastian & Huchtemann, Kristian & Müller, Dirk, 2016. "Quantifying the operational flexibility of building energy systems with thermal energy storages," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 140-154.
    7. Teirilä, Juha, 2020. "The value of the nuclear power plant fleet in the German power market under the expansion of fluctuating renewables," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    8. Oree, Vishwamitra & Sayed Hassen, Sayed Z., 2016. "A composite metric for assessing flexibility available in conventional generators of power systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 683-691.
    9. Cebulla, F. & Fichter, T., 2017. "Merit order or unit-commitment: How does thermal power plant modeling affect storage demand in energy system models?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 117-132.
    10. Harder, Nick & Qussous, Ramiz & Weidlich, Anke, 2020. "The cost of providing operational flexibility from distributed energy resources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    11. Dahlke, Steven & Sterling, John & Meehan, Colin, 2019. "Policy and market drivers for advancing clean energy," OSF Preprints hsbry, Center for Open Science.
    12. Nayak-Luke, Richard & Bañares-Alcántara, René & Collier, Sam, 2021. "Quantifying network flexibility requirements in terms of energy storage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 869-882.
    13. Kotowicz, Janusz & Bartela, Łukasz & Węcel, Daniel & Dubiel, Klaudia, 2017. "Hydrogen generator characteristics for storage of renewably-generated energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 156-171.
    14. Gallo, A.B. & Simões-Moreira, J.R. & Costa, H.K.M. & Santos, M.M. & Moutinho dos Santos, E., 2016. "Energy storage in the energy transition context: A technology review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 800-822.
    15. Koltsaklis, Nikolaos E. & Dagoumas, Athanasios S. & Panapakidis, Ioannis P., 2017. "Impact of the penetration of renewables on flexibility needs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 360-369.
    16. Batas Bjelić, Ilija & Rajaković, Nikola & Krajačić, Goran & Duić, Neven, 2016. "Two methods for decreasing the flexibility gap in national energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P3), pages 1701-1709.
    17. Arabzadeh, Vahid & Miettinen, Panu & Kotilainen, Titta & Herranen, Pasi & Karakoc, Alp & Kummu, Matti & Rautkari, Lauri, 2023. "Urban vertical farming with a large wind power share and optimised electricity costs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 331(C).
    18. Xiong, Bobby & Predel, Johannes & Crespo del Granado, Pedro & Egging-Bratseth, Ruud, 2021. "Spatial flexibility in redispatch: Supporting low carbon energy systems with Power-to-Gas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    19. Strübing, Dietmar & Moeller, Andreas B. & Mößnang, Bettina & Lebuhn, Michael & Drewes, Jörg E. & Koch, Konrad, 2018. "Anaerobic thermophilic trickle bed reactor as a promising technology for flexible and demand-oriented H2/CO2 biomethanation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 543-554.
    20. Madalina-Gabriela ANGHEL & Constantin ANGHELACHE & Alexandru MANOLE & Ana CARP, 2017. "The Strategy Of The European Union Member States In The Field Of Energy," Romanian Statistical Review Supplement, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 65(8), pages 19-34, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:137:y:2017:i:c:p:823-833. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.