IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v146y2025ics0140988325002981.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How to motivate clean production transformation?—a theoretical framework by game theory approach

Author

Listed:
  • Shang, Zezhong

Abstract

Clean production transformation is critical for sustainable development, yet limited research has addressed how public policies can incentivize firms to voluntarily adopt such practices. This paper bridges this gap by developing a game-theoretic framework featuring a government and two symmetric firms engaged in sequential strategy selection. The analysis reveals that a strategically designed minimum investment threshold is critical: while the government can induce voluntary CPT adoption via this mechanism, excessively high thresholds will deter firms from participating altogether. Sensitivity analyses further demonstrate distinct policy implications: 27% stricter minimum investment thresholds and 44% less subsidies are sufficient to effectively motivate CPT investments for labor-intensive firms, whereas capital-intensive firms are less responsive to such measures. In addition, tax exemptions and reduced supervision costs have minimal impact on firms’ optimal choices. However, tax incentives allow governments to set stricter thresholds, a doubled tax exemption triggers 67.9% subsidy cuts and 46.3% investment threshold increase. Lower supervision costs alleviate financing burdens without compromising policy efficacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Shang, Zezhong, 2025. "How to motivate clean production transformation?—a theoretical framework by game theory approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:146:y:2025:i:c:s0140988325002981
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325002981
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108474?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:146:y:2025:i:c:s0140988325002981. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.