IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v144y2025ics0140988325001264.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal participation of wind power producers in a hybrid intraday market: A multi-stage stochastic approach

Author

Listed:
  • Carrión, Miguel
  • Domínguez, Ruth
  • Oggioni, Giorgia

Abstract

The Single Intraday Coupling has imposed the integration of the European intraday electricity markets, taking as a benchmark the continuous trading structure. This has implied the creation of hybrid intraday electricity markets, defined as a mix of continuous and auction-based trading sessions, in those European countries with a former full auction system for this market. In this context, this paper proposes a multi-stage stochastic programming model for deciding the optimal participation of a wind power producer in a hybrid intraday market. This decision is made considering the possibility of participating in subsequent trading sessions, represented by a first continuous-intraday session, followed by an auction-based session and, then, a second section of the continuous intraday. As a final step, in the balancing market, the wind power producer can adjust its energy balance according to the wind power availability. The wind power availability, the prices in the intraday auction session and in the balancing market, and the acceptability of orders in the continuous sessions have been modelled as stochastic parameters. The risk level of the wind producer is represented in the formulation through the CVaR. By doing a deep study of the Spanish intraday market outcomes, we design a realistic case study and conduct several sensitivity analyses regarding the wind power availability, the prices in the market, the possibility of or not of participating in subsequent trading sessions, and the risk level. The main conclusions are: (i) arbitrage is observed in the participation of the wind power producer in the continuous and auction-based intraday sessions, especially under a risk-neutral perspective, (ii) the participation in the intraday continuous session is strongly influenced by the possibility of participating afterwards in the auction session, and (iii) the bidding strategy of a risk-averse wind power producer is mainly linked to the available wind power.

Suggested Citation

  • Carrión, Miguel & Domínguez, Ruth & Oggioni, Giorgia, 2025. "Optimal participation of wind power producers in a hybrid intraday market: A multi-stage stochastic approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:144:y:2025:i:c:s0140988325001264
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325001264
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108303?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benedikt Finnah, 2022. "Optimal bidding functions for renewable energies in sequential electricity markets," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 44(1), pages 1-27, March.
    2. Serafin, Tomasz & Marcjasz, Grzegorz & Weron, Rafał, 2022. "Trading on short-term path forecasts of intraday electricity prices," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    3. Scharff, Richard & Amelin, Mikael, 2016. "Trading behaviour on the continuous intraday market Elbas," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 544-557.
    4. Christoph Graf & Thomas Kuppelwieser & David Wozabal, 2024. "Frequent Auctions for Intraday Electricity Markets," The Energy Journal, , vol. 45(1), pages 231-256, January.
    5. Shilpa Bindu & José Pablo Chaves Ávila & Luis Olmos, 2023. "Factors Affecting Market Participant Decision Making in the Spanish Intraday Electricity Market: Auctions vs. Continuous Trading," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-23, July.
    6. Antonio J. Conejo & Miguel Carrión & Juan M. Morales, 2010. "Decision Making Under Uncertainty in Electricity Markets," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, number 978-1-4419-7421-1, December.
    7. Sebastiano Vitali & Ruth Domínguez & Vittorio Moriggia, 2021. "Comparing stage-scenario with nodal formulation for multistage stochastic problems," 4OR, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 613-631, December.
    8. Bertrand, Gilles & Papavasiliou, Anthony, 2020. "Adaptive Trading in Continuous Intraday Electricity Markets for a Storage Unit," LIDAM Reprints CORE 3104, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    9. Rintamäki, Tuomas & Siddiqui, Afzal S. & Salo, Ahti, 2020. "Strategic offering of a flexible producer in day-ahead and intraday power markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(3), pages 1136-1153.
    10. Silva, Ana R. & Pousinho, H.M.I. & Estanqueiro, Ana, 2022. "A multistage stochastic approach for the optimal bidding of variable renewable energy in the day-ahead, intraday and balancing markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    11. Alangi, Somayeh Rahimi & Bjørndal, Endre & Bjørndal, Mette, 2022. "Can the European intraday market be designed as a congestion management tool?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    12. Wozabal, David & Rameseder, Gunther, 2020. "Optimal bidding of a virtual power plant on the Spanish day-ahead and intraday market for electricity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 280(2), pages 639-655.
    13. Hu, Xiao & Jaraitė, Jūratė & Kažukauskas, Andrius, 2021. "The effects of wind power on electricity markets: A case study of the Swedish intraday market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    14. Rockafellar, R. Tyrrell & Uryasev, Stanislav, 2002. "Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(7), pages 1443-1471, July.
    15. Kuppelwieser, Thomas & Wozabal, David, 2021. "Liquidity costs on intraday power markets: Continuous trading versus auctions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eleni Ntemou & Filippos Ioannidis & Kyriaki Kosmidou & Kostas Andriosopoulos, 2025. "Navigating Electricity Market Design of Greece: Challenges and Reform Initiatives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-22, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rainer Baule & Michael Naumann, 2022. "Flexible Short-Term Electricity Certificates—An Analysis of Trading Strategies on the Continuous Intraday Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-28, August.
    2. David Schaurecker & David Wozabal & Nils Lohndorf & Thorsten Staake, 2025. "Maximizing Battery Storage Profits via High-Frequency Intraday Trading," Papers 2504.06932, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2025.
    3. Christos N. Dimitriadis & Evangelos G. Tsimopoulos & Michael C. Georgiadis, 2021. "A Review on the Complementarity Modelling in Competitive Electricity Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-27, November.
    4. Benedikt Finnah, 2022. "Optimal bidding functions for renewable energies in sequential electricity markets," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 44(1), pages 1-27, March.
    5. Paolo Falbo & Carlos Ruiz, 2021. "Joint optimization of sales-mix and generation plan for a large electricity producer," Papers 2110.02016, arXiv.org.
    6. Moret, Fabio & Pinson, Pierre & Papakonstantinou, Athanasios, 2020. "Heterogeneous risk preferences in community-based electricity markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(1), pages 36-48.
    7. Kaiss, Mateus & Wan, Yihao & Gebbran, Daniel & Vila, Clodomiro Unsihuay & Dragičević, Tomislav, 2025. "Review on Virtual Power Plants/Virtual Aggregators: Concepts, applications, prospects and operation strategies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    8. Micha{l} Narajewski & Florian Ziel, 2021. "Optimal bidding in hourly and quarter-hourly electricity price auctions: trading large volumes of power with market impact and transaction costs," Papers 2104.14204, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2022.
    9. repec:cte:wsrepe:38369 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Zheng, Yi & Wang, Jian & Wang, Chengmin & Huang, Chunyi & Yang, Jingfei & Xie, Ning, 2025. "Strategic bidding of wind farms in medium-to-long-term rolling transactions: A bi-level multi-agent deep reinforcement learning approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 383(C).
    11. Falbo, Paolo & Ruiz, Carlos, 2019. "Optimal sales-mix and generation plan in a two-stage electricity market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 598-614.
    12. Russo, Marianna & Kraft, Emil & Bertsch, Valentin & Keles, Dogan, 2022. "Short-term risk management of electricity retailers under rising shares of decentralized solar generation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    13. Kim, Seokwoo & Choi, Dong Gu, 2024. "A sample robust optimal bidding model for a virtual power plant," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(3), pages 1101-1113.
    14. Kraft, Emil & Russo, Marianna & Keles, Dogan & Bertsch, Valentin, 2023. "Stochastic optimization of trading strategies in sequential electricity markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(1), pages 400-421.
    15. Janczura, Joanna & Wójcik, Edyta, 2022. "Dynamic short-term risk management strategies for the choice of electricity market based on probabilistic forecasts of profit and risk measures. The German and the Polish market case study," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    16. Rom'an P'erez-Santalla & Miguel Carri'on & Carlos Ruiz, 2021. "Optimal pricing for electricity retailers based on data-driven consumers' price-response," Papers 2110.02735, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2022.
    17. Wafa Nafkha-Tayari & Seifeddine Ben Elghali & Ehsan Heydarian-Forushani & Mohamed Benbouzid, 2022. "Virtual Power Plants Optimization Issue: A Comprehensive Review on Methods, Solutions, and Prospects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    18. Román Pérez-Santalla & Miguel Carrión & Carlos Ruiz, 2022. "Optimal pricing for electricity retailers based on data-driven consumers’ price-response," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 30(3), pages 430-464, October.
    19. Hohl, Cody & Lo Prete, Chiara & Radhakrishnan, Ashish & Webster, Mort, 2023. "Intraday markets, wind integration and uplift payments in a regional U.S. power system," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    20. Younes Zahraoui & Tarmo Korõtko & Argo Rosin & Hannes Agabus, 2023. "Market Mechanisms and Trading in Microgrid Local Electricity Markets: A Comprehensive Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-52, February.
    21. Zheng, Kedi & Chen, Huiyao & Wang, Yi & Chen, Qixin, 2022. "Data-driven financial transmission right scenario generation and speculation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PC).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Bidding strategy; Intraday continuous session; Multi-stage stochastic problem; Short-term uncertainties; Wind producer;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
    • C63 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Computational Techniques
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    • L11 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Production, Pricing, and Market Structure; Size Distribution of Firms
    • L94 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Electric Utilities
    • Q4 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:144:y:2025:i:c:s0140988325001264. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.