IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v273y2019i3p874-888.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integer optimization with penalized fractional values: The Knapsack case

Author

Listed:
  • Malaguti, Enrico
  • Monaci, Michele
  • Paronuzzi, Paolo
  • Pferschy, Ulrich

Abstract

We consider integer optimization problems where variables can potentially take fractional values, but this occurrence is penalized in the objective function. This general situation has relevant examples in scheduling (preemption), routing (split delivery), cutting and telecommunications, just to mention a few. However, the general case in which variables integrality can be relaxed at cost of introducing a general penalty was not discussed before. As a case study, we consider the possibly simplest combinatorial optimization problem, namely the classical Knapsack Problem. We introduce the Fractional Knapsack Problem with Penalties (FKPP), a variant of the knapsack problem in which items can be split at the expense of a penalty depending on the fractional quantity. We analyze relevant properties of the problem, present alternative mathematical models, and analyze their performance from a theoretical viewpoint. In addition, we introduce a Fully Polynomial Time Approximation Scheme for the approximate solution of the general problem, and an improved dynamic programming approach that computes the optimal solution in one relevant case. We computationally test the proposed models and algorithms on a large set of instances derived from benchmarks from the literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Malaguti, Enrico & Monaci, Michele & Paronuzzi, Paolo & Pferschy, Ulrich, 2019. "Integer optimization with penalized fractional values: The Knapsack case," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 874-888.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:273:y:2019:i:3:p:874-888
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.09.020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221718307963
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.09.020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bretthauer, Kurt M. & Shetty, Bala, 2002. "The nonlinear knapsack problem - algorithms and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(3), pages 459-472, May.
    2. Malaguti, Enrico & Medina Durán, Rosa & Toth, Paolo, 2014. "Approaches to real world two-dimensional cutting problems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 99-115.
    3. Richard Freling & H. Edwin Romeijn & Dolores Romero Morales & Albert P. M. Wagelmans, 2003. "A Branch-and-Price Algorithm for the Multiperiod Single-Sourcing Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(6), pages 922-939, December.
    4. Pisinger, David, 1995. "A minimal algorithm for the multiple-choice knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 83(2), pages 394-410, June.
    5. Benjamin Byholm & Ivan Porres, 2018. "Fast algorithms for fragmentable items bin packing," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 697-723, October.
    6. G. L. Nemhauser & Z. Ullmann, 1969. "Discrete Dynamic Programming and Capital Allocation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(9), pages 494-505, May.
    7. Andrea Lodi & Silvano Martello & Michele Monaci & Claudio Cicconetti & Luciano Lenzini & Enzo Mingozzi & Carl Eklund & Jani Moilanen, 2011. "Efficient Two-Dimensional Packing Algorithms for Mobile WiMAX," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(12), pages 2130-2144, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Malaguti, Enrico & Monaci, Michele & Paronuzzi, Paolo & Pferschy, Ulrich, 2023. "Corrigendum to: ‘Integer optimization with penalized fractional values: The Knapsack case’ [European Journal of Operational Research (2019) 874–888]," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(2), pages 990-990.
    2. Evgeny Gurevsky & Dmitry Kopelevich & Sergey Kovalev & Mikhail Y. Kovalyov, 2023. "Integer knapsack problems with profit functions of the same value range," 4OR, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 405-419, September.
    3. Sergey Kovalev, 2022. "Approximation issues of fractional knapsack with penalties: a note," 4OR, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 209-216, June.
    4. Katrin Heßler & Stefan Irnich & Tobias Kreiter & Ulrich Pferschy, 2022. "Bin packing with lexicographic objectives for loading weight- and volume-constrained trucks in a direct-shipping system," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 44(2), pages 1-43, June.
    5. Katrin Heßler & Stefan Irnich & Tobias Kreiter & Ulrich Pferschy, 2020. "Lexicographic Bin-Packing Optimization for Loading Trucks in a Direct-Shipping System," Working Papers 2009, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sergey Kovalev, 2022. "Approximation issues of fractional knapsack with penalties: a note," 4OR, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 209-216, June.
    2. Fabio Furini & Enrico Malaguti & Dimitri Thomopulos, 2016. "Modeling Two-Dimensional Guillotine Cutting Problems via Integer Programming," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 736-751, November.
    3. Fleszar, Krzysztof, 2022. "A MILP model and two heuristics for the Bin Packing Problem with Conflicts and Item Fragmentation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 37-53.
    4. Christensen, Tue R.L. & Labbé, Martine, 2015. "A branch-cut-and-price algorithm for the piecewise linear transportation problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(3), pages 645-655.
    5. Zhong, Tao & Young, Rhonda, 2010. "Multiple Choice Knapsack Problem: Example of planning choice in transportation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 128-137, May.
    6. Fritz Bökler & Markus Chimani & Mirko H. Wagner, 2022. "On the rectangular knapsack problem," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 96(1), pages 149-160, August.
    7. Shuaian Wang & Dan Zhuge & Lu Zhen & Chung-Yee Lee, 2021. "Liner Shipping Service Planning Under Sulfur Emission Regulations," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(2), pages 491-509, March.
    8. Janssens, Jochen & Talarico, Luca & Sörensen, Kenneth, 2016. "A hybridised variable neighbourhood tabu search heuristic to increase security in a utility network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 221-230.
    9. Zhang, Jianzhong & Xu, Chengxian, 2010. "Inverse optimization for linearly constrained convex separable programming problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(3), pages 671-679, February.
    10. Walter, Rico & Schulze, Philipp & Scholl, Armin, 2021. "SALSA: Combining branch-and-bound with dynamic programming to smoothen workloads in simple assembly line balancing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(3), pages 857-873.
    11. Fujimoto, Masako & Yamada, Takeo, 2006. "An exact algorithm for the knapsack sharing problem with common items," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(2), pages 693-707, June.
    12. Mohammadivojdan, Roshanak & Geunes, Joseph, 2018. "The newsvendor problem with capacitated suppliers and quantity discounts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(1), pages 109-119.
    13. Degraeve, Z. & Jans, R.F., 2003. "Improved Lower Bounds For The Capacitated Lot Sizing Problem With Set Up Times," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2003-026-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    14. Mhand Hifi & Slim Sadfi & Abdelkader Sbihi, 2004. "An Exact Algorithm for the Multiple-choice Multidimensional Knapsack Problem," Post-Print halshs-03322716, HAL.
    15. M Hifi & M Michrafy, 2006. "A reactive local search-based algorithm for the disjunctively constrained knapsack problem," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(6), pages 718-726, June.
    16. Bennell, J.A. & Cabo, M. & Martínez-Sykora, A., 2018. "A beam search approach to solve the convex irregular bin packing problem with guillotine guts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(1), pages 89-102.
    17. Sbihi, Abdelkader, 2010. "A cooperative local search-based algorithm for the Multiple-Scenario Max-Min Knapsack Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(2), pages 339-346, April.
    18. Silva, Elsa & Oliveira, José Fernando & Silveira, Tiago & Mundim, Leandro & Carravilla, Maria Antónia, 2023. "The Floating-Cuts model: a general and flexible mixed-integer programming model for non-guillotine and guillotine rectangular cutting problems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    19. Christian Meier & Dennis Kundisch & Jochen Willeke, 2017. "Is it Worth the Effort?," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 59(2), pages 81-95, April.
    20. Boysen, Nils & Fliedner, Malte, 2008. "A versatile algorithm for assembly line balancing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(1), pages 39-56, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:273:y:2019:i:3:p:874-888. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.