IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v262y2017i1p194-206.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiple criteria mixed-integer programming for incorporating multiple factors into the development of master operating theatre timetables

Author

Listed:
  • Penn, M.L.
  • Potts, C.N.
  • Harper, P.R.

Abstract

Operating theatres and surgeons are among the most expensive resources in any hospital, so it is vital that they are used efficiently. Many European hospitals implement block scheduling, where each surgeon is assigned blocks of time in specific operating theatres on a cyclic basis. This paper proposes a model that assists hospitals in creating new master theatre timetables, which take account of reducing the maximum number of beds required, surgeons’ availability, surgeons’ preferences, variations in types of theatre and their suitability for different types of surgery, limited equipment availability, and the ability to vary the length of the cycle over which the timetable is repeated. The weightings given to each of these factors can be altered, thereby allowing exploration of a variety of possible timetables. Novel features of the model include consideration of surgeons’ preferences for slots, smoothing of bed usage during the generation of master theatre timetables and the use of operating theatres with the potential for the same theatre to be belong to multiple non-nested types. These new features are considered in combination with a range of other factors that have been considered in previous studies on the development of master theatre timetables.

Suggested Citation

  • Penn, M.L. & Potts, C.N. & Harper, P.R., 2017. "Multiple criteria mixed-integer programming for incorporating multiple factors into the development of master operating theatre timetables," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(1), pages 194-206.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:262:y:2017:i:1:p:194-206
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.03.065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221717302965
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.03.065?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M Arenas & A Bilbao & R Caballero & T Gómez & M V Rodríguez & F Ruiz, 2002. "Analysis via goal programming of the minimum achievable stay in surgical waiting lists," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 53(4), pages 387-396, April.
    2. Angela Testi & Elena Tanfani & Giancarlo Torre, 2007. "A three-phase approach for operating theatre schedules," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 163-172, June.
    3. Alessandro Agnetis & Alberto Coppi & Matteo Corsini & Gabriella Dellino & Carlo Meloni & Marco Pranzo, 2014. "A decomposition approach for the combined master surgical schedule and surgical case assignment problems," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 49-59, March.
    4. Pablo Santibáñez & Mehmet Begen & Derek Atkins, 2007. "Surgical block scheduling in a system of hospitals: an application to resource and wait list management in a British Columbia health authority," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 269-282, September.
    5. Bowers, John & Mould, Gillian, 2004. "Managing uncertainty in orthopaedic trauma theatres," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(3), pages 599-608, May.
    6. Belien, Jeroen & Demeulemeester, Erik, 2007. "Building cyclic master surgery schedules with leveled resulting bed occupancy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(2), pages 1185-1204, January.
    7. Harvey J. Greenberg & Frederic H. Murphy, 1991. "Approaches to Diagnosing Infeasible Linear Programs," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 3(3), pages 253-261, August.
    8. Hans, Erwin & Wullink, Gerhard & van Houdenhoven, Mark & Kazemier, Geert, 2008. "Robust surgery loading," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(3), pages 1038-1050, March.
    9. Blake, John T. & Carter, Michael W., 2002. "A goal programming approach to strategic resource allocation in acute care hospitals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(3), pages 541-561, August.
    10. John W. Chinneck, 1997. "Finding a Useful Subset of Constraints for Analysis in an Infeasible Linear Program," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 164-174, May.
    11. Frieze, A. M., 1983. "Complexity of a 3-dimensional assignment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 161-164, June.
    12. Fei, H. & Chu, C. & Meskens, N. & Artiba, A., 2008. "Solving surgical cases assignment problem by a branch-and-price approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 96-108, March.
    13. Fügener, Andreas & Hans, Erwin W. & Kolisch, Rainer & Kortbeek, Nikky & Vanberkel, Peter T., 2014. "Master surgery scheduling with consideration of multiple downstream units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(1), pages 227-236.
    14. Jones, Dylan, 2011. "A practical weight sensitivity algorithm for goal and multiple objective programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 238-245, August.
    15. John T. Blake & Joan Donald, 2002. "Mount Sinai Hospital Uses Integer Programming to Allocate Operating Room Time," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 63-73, April.
    16. Astaraky, Davood & Patrick, Jonathan, 2015. "A simulation based approximate dynamic programming approach to multi-class, multi-resource surgical scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(1), pages 309-319.
    17. Daskalaki, S. & Birbas, T. & Housos, E., 2004. "An integer programming formulation for a case study in university timetabling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(1), pages 117-135, February.
    18. Cardoen, Brecht & Demeulemeester, Erik & Beliën, Jeroen, 2010. "Operating room planning and scheduling: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(3), pages 921-932, March.
    19. John W. Chinneck, 2001. "Fast Heuristics for the Maximum Feasible Subsystem Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 210-223, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sean Harris & David Claudio, 2022. "Current Trends in Operating Room Scheduling 2015 to 2020: a Literature Review," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-42, March.
    2. Mariana Oliveira & Filippo Visintin & Daniel Santos & Inês Marques, 2022. "Flexible master surgery scheduling: combining optimization and simulation in a rolling horizon approach," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 824-858, December.
    3. Kamran Kianfar & Arezoo Atighehchian, 2023. "A hybrid heuristic approach to master surgery scheduling with downstream resource constraints and dividable operating room blocks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 328(1), pages 727-754, September.
    4. Loïc Deklerck & Babak Akbarzadeh & Broos Maenhout, 2022. "Constructing and evaluating a master surgery schedule using a service-level approach," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3663-3711, September.
    5. Shuwan Zhu & Wenjuan Fan & Shanlin Yang & Jun Pei & Panos M. Pardalos, 2019. "Operating room planning and surgical case scheduling: a review of literature," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 757-805, April.
    6. Shuwan Zhu & Wenjuan Fan & Tongzhu Liu & Shanlin Yang & Panos M. Pardalos, 2020. "Dynamic three-stage operating room scheduling considering patient waiting time and surgical overtime costs," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 185-215, January.
    7. Bovim, Thomas Reiten & Christiansen, Marielle & Gullhav, Anders N. & Range, Troels Martin & Hellemo, Lars, 2020. "Stochastic master surgery scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(2), pages 695-711.
    8. Şeyda Gür & Mehmet Pınarbaşı & Hacı Mehmet Alakaş & Tamer Eren, 2023. "Operating room scheduling with surgical team: a new approach with constraint programming and goal programming," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 31(4), pages 1061-1085, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Samudra & Carla Van Riet & Erik Demeulemeester & Brecht Cardoen & Nancy Vansteenkiste & Frank E. Rademakers, 2016. "Scheduling operating rooms: achievements, challenges and pitfalls," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 493-525, October.
    2. Shuwan Zhu & Wenjuan Fan & Shanlin Yang & Jun Pei & Panos M. Pardalos, 2019. "Operating room planning and surgical case scheduling: a review of literature," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 757-805, April.
    3. Cardoen, Brecht & Demeulemeester, Erik & Beliën, Jeroen, 2010. "Operating room planning and scheduling: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(3), pages 921-932, March.
    4. Xiangyong Li & N. Rafaliya & M. Fazle Baki & Ben A. Chaouch, 2017. "Scheduling elective surgeries: the tradeoff among bed capacity, waiting patients and operating room utilization using goal programming," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 33-54, March.
    5. Francesca Guerriero & Rosita Guido, 2011. "Operational research in the management of the operating theatre: a survey," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 89-114, March.
    6. Şeyda Gür & Tamer Eren & Hacı Mehmet Alakaş, 2019. "Surgical Operation Scheduling with Goal Programming and Constraint Programming: A Case Study," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-24, March.
    7. Thomas Schneider, A.J. & Theresia van Essen, J. & Carlier, Mijke & Hans, Erwin W., 2020. "Scheduling surgery groups considering multiple downstream resources," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 741-752.
    8. Eun, Joonyup & Kim, Sang-Phil & Yih, Yuehwern & Tiwari, Vikram, 2019. "Scheduling elective surgery patients considering time-dependent health urgency: Modeling and solution approaches," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 137-153.
    9. Brittney Benchoff & Candace Arai Yano & Alexandra Newman, 2017. "Kaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center Optimizes Operating Room Block Schedule for New Hospital," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 214-229, June.
    10. Narges Hosseini & Kevin Taaffe, 2015. "Allocating operating room block time using historical caseload variability," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 419-430, December.
    11. Range, Troels Martin & Kozlowski, Dawid & Petersen, Niels Chr., 2019. "Dynamic job assignment: A column generation approach with an application to surgery allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(1), pages 78-93.
    12. Silva, Thiago A.O. & de Souza, Mauricio C. & Saldanha, Rodney R. & Burke, Edmund K., 2015. "Surgical scheduling with simultaneous employment of specialised human resources," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(3), pages 719-730.
    13. Aisha Tayyab & Saif Ullah & Mohammed Fazle Baki, 2023. "An Outer Approximation Method for Scheduling Elective Surgeries with Sequence Dependent Setup Times to Multiple Operating Rooms," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, May.
    14. Javiera Barrera & Rodrigo A. Carrasco & Susana Mondschein & Gianpiero Canessa & David Rojas-Zalazar, 2020. "Operating room scheduling under waiting time constraints: the Chilean GES plan," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 286(1), pages 501-527, March.
    15. Range, Troels Martin & Kozlowski, Dawid & Petersen, Niels Chr., 2016. "Dynamic job assignment: A column generation approach with an application to surgery allocation," Discussion Papers on Economics 4/2016, University of Southern Denmark, Department of Economics.
    16. Siqueira, Cecília L. & Arruda, Edilson F. & Bahiense, Laura & Bahr, Germana L. & Motta, Geraldo R., 2018. "Long-term integrated surgery room optimization and recovery ward planning, with a case study in the Brazilian National Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics (INTO)," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(3), pages 870-883.
    17. Loïc Deklerck & Babak Akbarzadeh & Broos Maenhout, 2022. "Constructing and evaluating a master surgery schedule using a service-level approach," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3663-3711, September.
    18. repec:ipg:wpaper:2013-014 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Steffen Heider & Jan Schoenfelder & Thomas Koperna & Jens O. Brunner, 2022. "Balancing control and autonomy in master surgery scheduling: Benefits of ICU quotas for recovery units," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 311-332, June.
    20. Cappanera, Paola & Visintin, Filippo & Banditori, Carlo, 2014. "Comparing resource balancing criteria in master surgical scheduling: A combined optimisation-simulation approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 179-196.
    21. Duma, Davide & Aringhieri, Roberto, 2019. "The management of non-elective patients: shared vs. dedicated policies," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 199-212.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:262:y:2017:i:1:p:194-206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.