IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v202y2010i2p518-527.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Operations risk management by optimally planning the qualified workforce capacity

Author

Listed:
  • Fragnière, Emmanuel
  • Gondzio, Jacek
  • Yang, Xi

Abstract

Operational risks are defined as risks of human origin. Unlike financial risks that can be handled in a financial manner (e.g. insurances, savings, derivatives), the treatment of operational risks calls for a "managerial approach". Consequently, we propose a new way of dealing with operational risk, which relies on the well known aggregate planning model. To illustrate this idea, we have adapted this model to the case of a back office of a bank specializing in the trading of derivative products. Our contribution corresponds to several improvements applied to stochastic programming techniques. First, the model is transformed into a multistage stochastic program in order to take into account the randomness associated with the volume of transaction demand and with the capacity of work provided by qualified and non-qualified employees over the planning horizon. Second, as advocated by Basel II, we calculate the probability distribution based on a Bayesian Network to circumvent the difficulty of obtaining data which characterizes uncertainty in operations. Third, we go a step further by relaxing the traditional assumption in stochastic programming that imposes a strict independence between the decision variables and the random elements. Comparative results show that in general these improved stochastic programming models tend to allocate more human expertise in order to hedge operational risks. Finally, we employ the dual solutions of the stochastic programs to detect periods and nodes that are at risk in terms of the expertise availability.

Suggested Citation

  • Fragnière, Emmanuel & Gondzio, Jacek & Yang, Xi, 2010. "Operations risk management by optimally planning the qualified workforce capacity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(2), pages 518-527, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:202:y:2010:i:2:p:518-527
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(09)00348-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen C. Graves, 1981. "A Review of Production Scheduling," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 646-675, August.
    2. Ronald J. Ebert, 1976. "Aggregate Planning with Learning Curve Productivity," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 171-182, October.
    3. Tore Jonsbråten & Roger Wets & David Woodruff, 1998. "A class of stochastic programs withdecision dependent random elements," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 82(0), pages 83-106, August.
    4. Lars Brink & Bruce McCarl, 1978. "The Tradeoff between Expected Return and Risk Among Cornbelt Farmers," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 60(2), pages 259-263.
    5. William J. Abernathy & Nicholas Baloff & John C. Hershey & Sten Wandel, 1973. "A Three-Stage Manpower Planning and Scheduling Model—A Service-Sector Example," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 693-711, June.
    6. L.J. Krajewski & H.E. Thompson, 1975. "Efficient Employment Planning in Public Utilities," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 6(1), pages 314-326, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shantia, Ali & Aflaki, Sam & Masini, Andrea, 2021. "Contracting for technology improvement: The effect of asymmetric bargaining power and investment uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(2), pages 481-494.
    2. Roc'io Paredes & Marco Vega, 2020. "An internal fraud model for operational losses in retail banking," Papers 2002.03235, arXiv.org.
    3. Tahir Ekin & Nicholas G. Polson & Refik Soyer, 2017. "Augmented nested sampling for stochastic programs with recourse and endogenous uncertainty," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(8), pages 613-627, December.
    4. Mizgier, Kamil J. & Hora, Manpreet & Wagner, Stephan M. & Jüttner, Matthias P., 2015. "Managing operational disruptions through capital adequacy and process improvement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(1), pages 320-332.
    5. De Bruecker, Philippe & Van den Bergh, Jorne & Beliën, Jeroen & Demeulemeester, Erik, 2015. "Workforce planning incorporating skills: State of the art," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(1), pages 1-16.
    6. Ekin, Tahir, 2018. "Integrated maintenance and production planning with endogenous uncertain yield," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 52-61.
    7. Sovan Mitra & Andreas Karathanasopoulos, 2019. "Firm Value and the Impact of Operational Management," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 26(1), pages 61-85, March.
    8. Corominas, Albert & Lusa, Amaia & Olivella, Jordi, 2012. "A detailed workforce planning model including non-linear dependence of capacity on the size of the staff and cash management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(2), pages 445-458.
    9. Valeva, Silviya & Hewitt, Mike & Thomas, Barrett W. & Brown, Kenneth G., 2017. "Balancing flexibility and inventory in workforce planning with learning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PA), pages 194-207.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Saravanan Kesavan & Bradley R. Staats & Wendell Gilland, 2014. "Volume Flexibility in Services: The Costs and Benefits of Flexible Labor Resources," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(8), pages 1884-1906, August.
    2. El Mehdi, Er Raqabi & Ilyas, Himmich & Nizar, El Hachemi & Issmaïl, El Hallaoui & François, Soumis, 2023. "Incremental LNS framework for integrated production, inventory, and vessel scheduling: Application to a global supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    3. Rawlins, Richard B. & Bernardo, Daniel J., 1991. "Incorporating Uncertainty In The Analysis Of Optimal Beef-Forage Production Systems," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 23(1), pages 1-13, July.
    4. Young, Douglas & Lin, William & Pope, Rulon & Robison, Lindon & Selley, Roger, 1979. "Risk Preferences Of Agricultual Producers:Their Measurement And Use," Risk Management in Agriculture: Behavioral, Managerial, and Policy Issues, January 25-26, 1979, San Francisco, California 271459, Regional Research Projects > W-149: An Economic Evaluation of Managing Market Risks in Agriculture.
    5. Ilkyeong Moon & Sanghyup Lee & Moonsoo Shin & Kwangyeol Ryu, 2016. "Evolutionary resource assignment for workload-based production scheduling," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 375-388, April.
    6. Adrien Hervouet & Marc Baudry, 2011. "Promoting innovation in the seed market and biodiversity: the role of IPRs and commercialization rules," Post-Print hal-02012239, HAL.
    7. Hammida, Mustapha & Eidman, Vernon R., 1991. "Livestock And Poultry Production Risk In The United States," Staff Papers 14016, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    8. Lien, Gudbrand, 2002. "Non-parametric estimation of decision makers' risk aversion," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 75-83, May.
    9. Bechtel, Amos I. & Young, Douglas L., 1999. "The Importance Of Using Farm Level Risk Estimates In Crp Enrollment Decisions," 1999 Annual Meeting, July 11-14, 1999, Fargo, ND 35717, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    10. Ekin, Tahir, 2018. "Integrated maintenance and production planning with endogenous uncertain yield," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 52-61.
    11. Giovanni Pantuso, 2021. "A node formulation for multistage stochastic programs with endogenous uncertainty," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 325-354, July.
    12. O. Zeynep Akşin, 2007. "On valuing appreciating human assets in services," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(2), pages 221-235, March.
    13. Lindau, Roger A., 1997. "Automatic data capture and its impact on productivity," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(1-2), pages 91-103, October.
    14. Doan, Xuan Vinh, 2022. "Distributionally robust optimization under endogenous uncertainty with an application in retrofitting planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(1), pages 73-84.
    15. Huang, Hai-Jun & Xu, Gang, 1998. "Aggregate scheduling and network solving of multi-stage and multi-item manufacturing systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 52-65, February.
    16. van Zyl, J. & Groenewald, J. A., 1986. "A Comparison Of Certain Decision-Making Techniques Under Risk - An Empirical Investigation Of Maize Cultivar Selection," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 25(1), February.
    17. Pflughoeft, K. A. & Hutchinson, G. K. & Nazareth, D. L., 1996. "Intelligent decision support for flexible manufacturing: Design and implementation of a knowledge-based simulator," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 347-360, June.
    18. Borgonjon, Tessa & Maenhout, Broos, 2022. "An exact approach for the personnel task rescheduling problem with task retiming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(2), pages 465-484.
    19. Young-Chae Hong & Amy Cohn & Stephen Gorga & Edmond O’Brien & William Pozehl & Jennifer Zank, 2019. "Using Optimization Techniques and Multidisciplinary Collaboration to Solve a Challenging Real-World Residency Scheduling Problem," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 201-212, May.
    20. Louhichi, Kamel & Flichman, Guillermo & Blanco Fonseca, Maria, 2009. "A generic template for FSSIM," Reports 57463, Wageningen University, SEAMLESS: System for Environmental and Agricultural Modelling; Linking European Science and Society.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:202:y:2010:i:2:p:518-527. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.