Improving discrimination in data envelopment analysis: PCA-DEA or variable reduction
Within the data envelopment analysis context, problems of discrimination between efficient and inefficient decision-making units often arise, particularly if there are a relatively large number of variables with respect to observations. This paper applies Monte Carlo simulation to generalize and compare two discrimination improving methods; principal component analysis applied to data envelopment analysis (PCA-DEA) and variable reduction based on partial covariance (VR). Performance criteria are based on the percentage of observations incorrectly classified; efficient decision-making units mistakenly defined as inefficient and inefficient units defined as efficient. A trade-off was observed with both methods improving discrimination by reducing the probability of the latter error at the expense of a small increase in the probability of the former error. A comparison of the methodologies demonstrates that PCA-DEA provides a more powerful tool than VR with consistently more accurate results. PCA-DEA is applied to all basic DEA models and guidelines for its application are presented in order to minimize misclassification and prove particularly useful when analyzing relatively small datasets, removing the need for additional preference information.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:202:y:2010:i:1:p:273-284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Zhang, Lei)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.