IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v513y2026ics0304380025003990.html

A theoretical framework for the methodology of carbon sink assessment in China: A literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Hu, Yu-Jie
  • Cao, Ren-Jie

Abstract

Ecosystem carbon sinks play a crucial role in mitigating climate change by sequestering carbon within ecosystems, thereby reducing atmospheric CO₂ concentrations. There is a lack of a unified theoretical framework and applicability research on methods for assessing carbon sinks. Therefore, this study comprehensively analyzes all mainstream carbon sink assessment methods. The selection of the Carnegie-Ames-Stanford approach (CASA) model known for its robust applicability, is made after evaluating principles, heterogeneity, and practicality. Then based on CASA model, through systematic literature analysis, we construct a three-parameter synergistic improvement theoretical framework. And taking China as a case study, this study develops the carbon sink assessment methodology applicable to sub-regional implementation. This will reduce the uncertainty in China's carbon sink assessment and provide a basis for the implementation of carbon sink management strategies to combat climate change.

Suggested Citation

  • Hu, Yu-Jie & Cao, Ren-Jie, 2026. "A theoretical framework for the methodology of carbon sink assessment in China: A literature review," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 513(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:513:y:2026:i:c:s0304380025003990
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111413
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380025003990
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111413?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:513:y:2026:i:c:s0304380025003990. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.