IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v501y2025ics0304380025000043.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land suitability assessment and self-sufficiency evaluation for fodder crop production in a hyper arid environment coupling GIS-based multi-criteria decision making and optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Bilal, Hazrat
  • Lahlou, Fatima-Zahra
  • Al-Ansari, Tareq

Abstract

Site selection for outdoor agricultural activities is crucial in hyper-arid environments. This study evaluates land suitability for fodder crop production in the State of Qatar. It aims to provide a multi-criteria evaluation based spatial decision support system, considering the usage of rainfall, treated wastewater, and groundwater for irrigation. Analytic Hierarchy Process and GIS-based multi-criteria approaches are used to calculate the weights of evaluation criteria and generate suitability maps. A considerable land area can potentially be used for fodder crop production, considering different water sources including groundwater, treated wastewater and rainfed irrigation. Results demonstrate that relying solely on rainfall limits the most suitable area for green fodder cultivation to just 8-653 km2. However, when groundwater and treated wastewater are incorporated into the water budget allocated for fodder production, the most suitable area expands to 25-2072 km2. An optimization model is then developed to estimate the maximum self-sufficiency that can be achieved between 2024 and 2030 considering land suitability maps and different water budgets. Some of the dominant limiting factors for fodder crop self-sufficiency are erratic rainfall, spatial heterogeneity in groundwater quality and transportation of wastewater for irrigation. To achieve self-sufficiency in fodder crop production, 456 km2 of land, 91.3 thousand cubic meter of water and 73–456 MWh of energy are required annually. Given the country's water budget and irrigation practices, the maximum self-sufficiency that can be achieved in 2030 is 48.6%, which entails the use of 57 million m3 of groundwater resources and up to 464 million m3 of treated sewage effluent. This highlights that, through strategic planning and sustainable water resource management, the country has the potential to significantly enhance its self-sufficiency in fodder crop production.

Suggested Citation

  • Bilal, Hazrat & Lahlou, Fatima-Zahra & Al-Ansari, Tareq, 2025. "Land suitability assessment and self-sufficiency evaluation for fodder crop production in a hyper arid environment coupling GIS-based multi-criteria decision making and optimization," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 501(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:501:y:2025:i:c:s0304380025000043
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380025000043
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas L. Saaty, 1987. "Risk—Its Priority and Probability: The Analytic Hierarchy Process," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(2), pages 159-172, June.
    2. Tarek Ben Hassen & Hamid El Bilali & Mohammed Al-Maadeed, 2020. "Agri-Food Markets in Qatar: Drivers, Trends, and Policy Responses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-31, May.
    3. Billal Hossen & Helmut Yabar & Takeshi Mizunoya, 2021. "Land Suitability Assessment for Pulse (Green Gram) Production through Remote Sensing, GIS and Multicriteria Analysis in the Coastal Region of Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-24, November.
    4. Amal Aldababseh & Marouane Temimi & Praveen Maghelal & Oliver Branch & Volker Wulfmeyer, 2018. "Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Irrigated Agriculture Suitability to Achieve Food Security in an Arid Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-33, March.
    5. Libutti, Angela & Gatta, Giuseppe & Gagliardi, Anna & Vergine, Pompilio & Pollice, Alfieri & Beneduce, Luciano & Disciglio, Grazia & Tarantino, Emanuele, 2018. "Agro-industrial wastewater reuse for irrigation of a vegetable crop succession under Mediterranean conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 1-14.
    6. Kazemi, Fatemeh & Hosseinpour, Nazanin, 2022. "GIS-based land-use suitability analysis for urban agriculture development based on pollution distributions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Theodora Karanisa & Alexandre Amato & Renee Richer & Sara Abdul Majid & Cynthia Skelhorn & Sami Sayadi, 2021. "Agricultural Production in Qatar’s Hot Arid Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-25, April.
    2. Eduardo Rodrigues Sanguinet & Francisco de Borja García-García, 2023. "Rural-Urban Linkages: Regional Financial Business Services’ Integration into Chilean Agri-Food Value Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Xiaoyan Jiang & Sai Wang & Jie Wang & Sainan Lyu & Martin Skitmore, 2020. "A Decision Method for Construction Safety Risk Management Based on Ontology and Improved CBR: Example of a Subway Project," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-23, June.
    4. Pedrero, Francisco & Grattan, S.R. & Ben-Gal, Alon & Vivaldi, Gaetano Alessandro, 2020. "Opportunities for expanding the use of wastewaters for irrigation of olives," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    5. Patrick Krieger & Carsten Lausberg, 2021. "Entscheidungen, Entscheidungsfindung und Entscheidungsunterstützung in der Immobilienwirtschaft: Eine systematische Literaturübersicht [Decisions, decision-making and decisions support systems in r," Zeitschrift für Immobilienökonomie (German Journal of Real Estate Research), Springer;Gesellschaft für Immobilienwirtschaftliche Forschung e. V., vol. 7(1), pages 1-33, April.
    6. Qi Wei & Rui Wang & Chuan-Yang Ruan, 2024. "Similarity Measures of Probabilistic Interval Preference Ordering Sets and Their Applications in Decision-Making," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-26, October.
    7. Vasileios A. Tzanakakis & Andrea G. Capodaglio & Andreas N. Angelakis, 2023. "Insights into Global Water Reuse Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-30, August.
    8. Burak, Selmin & Samanlioglu, Funda & Ulker, Duygu & Kup, Eyup Tolunay, 2024. "Ranking willingness to reuse water in cotton irrigation with hybrid MCDM methods: Soke plain case study," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    9. Marios Tsioufis & Antonios Fytopoulos & Dimitra Kalaitzi & Thomas A. Alexopoulos, 2024. "Discovering maritime-piracy hotspots: a study based on AHP and spatio-temporal analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 335(2), pages 861-883, April.
    10. Abdul, Daud & Wenqi, Jiang & Tanveer, Arsalan, 2022. "Prioritization of renewable energy source for electricity generation through AHP-VIKOR integrated methodology," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1018-1032.
    11. Goraj, Rafał & Kiciński, Marcin & Ślefarski, Rafał & Duczkowska, Anna, 2023. "Validity of decision criteria for selecting power-to-gas projects in Poland," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    12. Waseem Ahmad Ismaeel & J Satish Kumar, 2024. "Land suitability analysis of new urban areas using MIF-AHP and bivariate analysis methods in Latakia, Syria," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 8087-8101, March.
    13. Reher, Thomas & Lavaert, Cas & Ottoy, Sam & Martens, Johan A. & Van Orshoven, Jos & Cappelle, Jan & Diels, Jan & Van de Poel, Bram, 2025. "Room for renewables: A GIS-based agrivoltaics site suitability analysis in urbanized landscapes," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    14. Andreas N. Angelakis & Mohammad Valipour & Abdelkader T. Ahmed & Vasileios Tzanakakis & Nikolaos V. Paranychianakis & Jens Krasilnikoff & Renato Drusiani & Larry Mays & Fatma El Gohary & Demetris Kout, 2021. "Water Conflicts: From Ancient to Modern Times and in the Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-31, April.
    15. Mabasa, Nyiko C. & Jones, Clifford L.W. & Laing, Mark, 2021. "The use of treated brewery effluent for salt tolerant crop irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    16. Kangning Dong & Hongwei Wang & Kui Luo & Xiaomei Yan & Suyan Yi & Xin Huang, 2024. "The Use of an Optimized Grey Multi-Objective Programming-PLUS Model for Multi-Scenario Simulation of Land Use in the Weigan–Kuche River Oasis, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, June.
    17. Parisa Alizadeh-Dehkordi & Behnam Kamkar & Alireza Nehbandani, 2024. "The effect of climate change on the future of rainfed wheat cultivation in Iran," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 687-709, January.
    18. Galmandakh Boldbaatar & Gantulga Gombodorj & Dorligjav Donorov & Robert Andriambololonaharisoamalala & Myagmarjav Indra & Myagmartseren Purevtseren, 2024. "Land suitability analysis in monocentric post-socialist city: Case of Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(8), pages 1-20, August.
    19. Zolfaghary, Parvin & Zakerinia, Mahdi & Kazemi, Hossein, 2021. "A model for the use of urban treated wastewater in agriculture using multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) and geographic information system (GIS)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    20. Rusche, Simon & Weissflog., Jan & Wenninger, Simon & Häckel, Björn, 2023. "How flexible are energy flexibilities? Developing a flexibility score for revenue and risk analysis in industrial demand-side management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 345(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:501:y:2025:i:c:s0304380025000043. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.