IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v345y2023ics0306261923007158.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How flexible are energy flexibilities? Developing a flexibility score for revenue and risk analysis in industrial demand-side management

Author

Listed:
  • Rusche, Simon
  • Weissflog., Jan
  • Wenninger, Simon
  • Häckel, Björn

Abstract

With rising and increasingly volatile energy prices, demand-side management (DSM) is becoming attractive within industry to optimize flexible electricity demand and to remain competitive. Despite economic and ecological benefits for companies, DSM implementation is not yet widespread. High effort in flexibility audits and complex optimization models to quantify DSM’s economic potentials represent initial barriers in practice, raising the question whether there is a simple way to analyze economic DSM potential as an initial indicator of successful DSM implementation that requires little data on flexibility characteristics. To address this need, this study develops a flexibility score that describes the degrees of freedom of individual energy flexibility measures (EFMs), i.e. how flexible a flexibility measure is. The flexibility score is tested and validated in a risk-return analysis on 46 real-world industrial EFMs from Germany optimized with integer linear programming (ILP). Analyzing Germany’s Day-Ahead and Intraday markets, the results show an increase in expected revenues and a simultaneous decrease in revenue risk with an increasing flexibility score, outlining DSM investments as attractive. Due to its ease of use, we see industrial companies, aggregators, energy service providers, and (energy) consultancy agencies as target users of the flexibility score. Policymakers can use the flexibility score to identify and design subsidies for energy flexibility investments.

Suggested Citation

  • Rusche, Simon & Weissflog., Jan & Wenninger, Simon & Häckel, Björn, 2023. "How flexible are energy flexibilities? Developing a flexibility score for revenue and risk analysis in industrial demand-side management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 345(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:345:y:2023:i:c:s0306261923007158
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121351
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261923007158
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121351?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Papaefthymiou, Georgios & Haesen, Edwin & Sach, Thobias, 2018. "Power System Flexibility Tracker: Indicators to track flexibility progress towards high-RES systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 1026-1035.
    2. Alcázar-Ortega, Manuel & Calpe, Carmen & Theisen, Thomas & Carbonell-Carretero, José Francisco, 2015. "Methodology for the identification, evaluation and prioritization of market handicaps which prevent the implementation of Demand Response: Application to European electricity markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 529-543.
    3. Thomas L. Saaty, 1987. "Risk—Its Priority and Probability: The Analytic Hierarchy Process," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(2), pages 159-172, June.
    4. Leinauer, Christina & Schott, Paul & Fridgen, Gilbert & Keller, Robert & Ollig, Philipp & Weibelzahl, Martin, 2022. "Obstacles to demand response: Why industrial companies do not adapt their power consumption to volatile power generation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    5. Huang, Shoujun & Abedinia, Oveis, 2021. "Investigation in economic analysis of microgrids based on renewable energy uncertainty and demand response in the electricity market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    6. Michael Schoepf & Martin Weibelzahl & Lisa Nowka, 2018. "The Impact of Substituting Production Technologies on the Economic Demand Response Potential in Industrial Processes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-13, August.
    7. Forero-Quintero, Jose-Fernando & Villafáfila-Robles, Roberto & Barja-Martinez, Sara & Munné-Collado, Ingrid & Olivella-Rosell, Pol & Montesinos-Miracle, Daniel, 2022. "Profitability analysis on demand-side flexibility: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    8. Jessica Walther & Bastian Dietrich & Benedikt Grosch & Martin Lindner & Daniel Fuhrländer-Völker & Nina Strobel & Matthias Weigold, 2022. "A Methodology for the Classification and Characterisation of Industrial Demand-Side Integration Measures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-26, January.
    9. Alejandro Tristán & Flurina Heuberger & Alexander Sauer, 2020. "A Methodology to Systematically Identify and Characterize Energy Flexibility Measures in Industrial Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-35, November.
    10. Girolama Airò Farulla & Giovanni Tumminia & Francesco Sergi & Davide Aloisio & Maurizio Cellura & Vincenzo Antonucci & Marco Ferraro, 2021. "A Review of Key Performance Indicators for Building Flexibility Quantification to Support the Clean Energy Transition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-19, September.
    11. Paul Schott & Johannes Sedlmeir & Nina Strobel & Thomas Weber & Gilbert Fridgen & Eberhard Abele, 2019. "A Generic Data Model for Describing Flexibility in Power Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-29, May.
    12. Halbrügge, Stephanie & Buhl, Hans Ulrich & Fridgen, Gilbert & Schott, Paul & Weibelzahl, Martin & Weissflog, Jan, 2022. "How Germany achieved a record share of renewables during the COVID-19 pandemic while relying on the European interconnected power network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    13. Summerbell, Daniel L. & Khripko, Diana & Barlow, Claire & Hesselbach, Jens, 2017. "Cost and carbon reductions from industrial demand-side management: Study of potential savings at a cement plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 100-113.
    14. Mark Kipngetich Kiptoo & Oludamilare Bode Adewuyi & Mohammed Elsayed Lotfy & Theophilus Amara & Keifa Vamba Konneh & Tomonobu Senjyu, 2019. "Assessing the Techno-Economic Benefits of Flexible Demand Resources Scheduling for Renewable Energy–Based Smart Microgrid Planning," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, October.
    15. Paulus, Moritz & Borggrefe, Frieder, 2011. "The potential of demand-side management in energy-intensive industries for electricity markets in Germany," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 432-441, February.
    16. Heffron, Raphael & Körner, Marc-Fabian & Wagner, Jonathan & Weibelzahl, Martin & Fridgen, Gilbert, 2020. "Industrial demand-side flexibility: A key element of a just energy transition and industrial development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heffron, Raphael & Körner, Marc-Fabian & Wagner, Jonathan & Weibelzahl, Martin & Fridgen, Gilbert, 2020. "Industrial demand-side flexibility: A key element of a just energy transition and industrial development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    2. Michael Schoepf & Martin Weibelzahl & Lisa Nowka, 2018. "The Impact of Substituting Production Technologies on the Economic Demand Response Potential in Industrial Processes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-13, August.
    3. Fatras, Nicolas & Ma, Zheng & Jørgensen, Bo Nørregaard, 2022. "Process-to-market matrix mapping: A multi-criteria evaluation framework for industrial processes’ electricity market participation feasibility," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    4. Golmohamadi, Hessam, 2022. "Demand-side management in industrial sector: A review of heavy industries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    5. Heffron, Raphael J. & Körner, Marc-Fabian & Schöpf, Michael & Wagner, Jonathan & Weibelzahl, Martin, 2021. "The role of flexibility in the light of the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: Contributing to a sustainable and resilient energy future in Europe," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    6. Martin Bichler & Hans Ulrich Buhl & Johannes Knörr & Felipe Maldonado & Paul Schott & Stefan Waldherr & Martin Weibelzahl, 2022. "Electricity Markets in a Time of Change: A Call to Arms for Business Research," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 74(1), pages 77-102, March.
    7. Halbrügge, Stephanie & Schott, Paul & Weibelzahl, Martin & Buhl, Hans Ulrich & Fridgen, Gilbert & Schöpf, Michael, 2021. "How did the German and other European electricity systems react to the COVID-19 pandemic?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    8. Fatras, Nicolas & Ma, Zheng & Duan, Hongbo & Jørgensen, Bo Nørregaard, 2022. "A systematic review of electricity market liberalisation and its alignment with industrial consumer participation: A comparison between the Nordics and China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    9. Leinauer, Christina & Schott, Paul & Fridgen, Gilbert & Keller, Robert & Ollig, Philipp & Weibelzahl, Martin, 2022. "Obstacles to demand response: Why industrial companies do not adapt their power consumption to volatile power generation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    10. Körner, Marc-Fabian & Sedlmeir, Johannes & Weibelzahl, Martin & Fridgen, Gilbert & Heine, Moreen & Neumann, Christoph, 2022. "Systemic risks in electricity systems: A perspective on the potential of digital technologies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    11. Cai, Qiran & Xu, Qingyang & Qing, Jing & Shi, Gang & Liang, Qiao-Mei, 2022. "Promoting wind and photovoltaics renewable energy integration through demand response: Dynamic pricing mechanism design and economic analysis for smart residential communities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    12. Richstein, Jörn C. & Hosseinioun, Seyed Saeed, 2020. "Industrial demand response: How network tariffs and regulation (do not) impact flexibility provision in electricity markets and reserves," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    13. Mark Kipngetich Kiptoo & Oludamilare Bode Adewuyi & Harun Or Rashid Howlader & Akito Nakadomari & Tomonobu Senjyu, 2023. "Optimal Capacity and Operational Planning for Renewable Energy-Based Microgrid Considering Different Demand-Side Management Strategies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-25, May.
    14. Ambrosius, Mirjam & Grimm, Veronika & Sölch, Christian & Zöttl, Gregor, 2018. "Investment incentives for flexible demand options under different market designs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 372-389.
    15. Herre, Lars & Tomasini, Federica & Paridari, Kaveh & Söder, Lennart & Nordström, Lars, 2020. "Simplified model of integrated paper mill for optimal bidding in energy and reserve markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    16. Dranka, Géremi Gilson & Ferreira, Paula, 2019. "Review and assessment of the different categories of demand response potentials," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 280-294.
    17. Chiara Magni & Robbe Peeters & Sylvain Quoilin & Alessia Arteconi, 2024. "Assessing the Flexibility Potential of Industrial Heat–Electricity Sector Coupling through High-Temperature Heat Pumps: The Case Study of Belgium," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-14, January.
    18. Nina Strobel & Daniel Fuhrländer-Völker & Matthias Weigold & Eberhard Abele, 2020. "Quantifying the Demand Response Potential of Inherent Energy Storages in Production Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-22, August.
    19. Kirchem, Dana & Lynch, Muireann Á. & Bertsch, Valentin & Casey, Eoin, 2020. "Modelling demand response with process models and energy systems models: Potential applications for wastewater treatment within the energy-water nexus," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    20. Roksana Yasmin & B. M. Ruhul Amin & Rakibuzzaman Shah & Andrew Barton, 2024. "A Survey of Commercial and Industrial Demand Response Flexibility with Energy Storage Systems and Renewable Energy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-41, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:345:y:2023:i:c:s0306261923007158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.