IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v424y2020ics0304380020300910.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Weak intra-guild predation facilitates consumer coexistence but does not guarantee higher consumer density

Author

Listed:
  • Chang, Feng-Hsun
  • Ke, Po-Ju
  • Cardinale, Bradley

Abstract

In plant communities, resource partitioning has been shown to facilitate species coexistence and, in turn, enhance community density. Such positive effects of resource partitioning in higher trophic levels are not as obvious possibly due to the occurrence of intra-guild predation (IGP). We thus built a model to explore the joint effects of IGP and resource partitioning on consumer coexistence and their collective density as rarely have studies investigated this joint effect. The model consists of two prey resources that do not directly compete with each other and two consumers that are engaged in IGP and can partition their use of the two prey resources. This model shows that the effects of IGP on consumer coexistence depend on which consumer requires the lower resource density to persist. When the IG predator is the inferior competitor, weak IGP enhances coexistence by lowering the minimum degree of partitioning that is required for coexistence; otherwise, IGP always constrains coexistence. In addition, the effects of IGP on total consumer density (Ztot) depends on which consumer has the lower maximum growth potential, defined as the difference between their maximum growth rate and mortality. Weak IGP increases Ztot when the IG predator has lower maximum growth potential; otherwise, IGP always decreases Ztot. Last, the criterion for IGP to have positive effects on consumer coexistence and Ztot are different. Our results show that weak to intermediate strengths of intra-guild predation can facilitate consumer coexistence and total community density, but consumer coexistence does not guarantee higher consumer density.

Suggested Citation

  • Chang, Feng-Hsun & Ke, Po-Ju & Cardinale, Bradley, 2020. "Weak intra-guild predation facilitates consumer coexistence but does not guarantee higher consumer density," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 424(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:424:y:2020:i:c:s0304380020300910
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380020300910
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michel Loreau & Andy Hector, 2001. "Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments," Nature, Nature, vol. 412(6842), pages 72-76, July.
    2. Kevin McCann & Alan Hastings & Gary R. Huxel, 1998. "Weak trophic interactions and the balance of nature," Nature, Nature, vol. 395(6704), pages 794-798, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chun-Wei Chang & Takeshi Miki & Hao Ye & Sami Souissi & Rita Adrian & Orlane Anneville & Helen Agasild & Syuhei Ban & Yaron Be’eri-Shlevin & Yin-Ru Chiang & Heidrun Feuchtmayr & Gideon Gal & Satoshi I, 2022. "Causal networks of phytoplankton diversity and biomass are modulated by environmental context," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Yan, Chuan & Zhang, Zhibin, 2018. "Dome-shaped transition between positive and negative interactions maintains higher persistence and biomass in more complex ecological networks," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 370(C), pages 14-21.
    3. Tesfaye, Wondimagegn & Tirivayi, Nyasha, 2020. "Crop diversity, household welfare and consumption smoothing under risk: Evidence from rural Uganda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    4. Asrat, Sinafikeh & Yesuf, Mahmud & Carlsson, Fredrik & Wale, Edilegnaw, 2009. "Farmers’ Preferences for Crop Variety Traits: Lessons for On-Farm Conservation and Technology Adoption," RFF Working Paper Series dp-09-15-efd, Resources for the Future.
    5. Pachepsky, Elizaveta & Bown, James L. & Eberst, Alistair & Bausenwein, Ursula & Millard, Peter & Squire, Geoff R. & Crawford, John W., 2007. "Consequences of intraspecific variation for the structure and function of ecological communities Part 2: Linking diversity and function," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 277-285.
    6. Dai, Chuanjun & Zhao, Min & Chen, Lansun, 2012. "Complex dynamic behavior of three-species ecological model with impulse perturbations and seasonal disturbances," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 83-97.
    7. Di Falco, Salvatore & Bezabih, Mintewab & Yesuf, Mahmud, 2010. "Seeds for livelihood: Crop biodiversity and food production in Ethiopia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 1695-1702, June.
    8. George Van Voorn & Geerten Hengeveld & Jan Verhagen, 2020. "An agent based model representation to assess resilience and efficiency of food supply chains," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-27, November.
    9. Dina in ‘t Zandt & Zuzana Kolaříková & Tomáš Cajthaml & Zuzana Münzbergová, 2023. "Plant community stability is associated with a decoupling of prokaryote and fungal soil networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    10. Miehls, Andrea L. Jaeger & Mason, Doran M. & Frank, Kenneth A. & Krause, Ann E. & Peacor, Scott D. & Taylor, William W., 2009. "Invasive species impacts on ecosystem structure and function: A comparison of the Bay of Quinte, Canada, and Oneida Lake, USA, before and after zebra mussel invasion," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(22), pages 3182-3193.
    11. Christopher C Wilmers & Wayne M Getz, 2005. "Gray Wolves as Climate Change Buffers in Yellowstone," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(4), pages 1-1, March.
    12. Gabriela Woźniak & Monika Malicka & Jacek Kasztowski & Łukasz Radosz & Joanna Czarnecka & Jaco Vangronsveld & Dariusz Prostański, 2022. "How Important Are the Relations between Vegetation Diversity and Bacterial Functional Diversity for the Functioning of Novel Ecosystems?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Scotti, Marco & Bondavalli, Cristina & Bodini, Antonio, 2009. "Linking trophic positions and flow structure constraints in ecological networks: Energy transfer efficiency or topology effect?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(21), pages 3070-3080.
    14. Hartvig, Martin & Andersen, Ken Haste, 2013. "Coexistence of structured populations with size-based prey selection," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 24-33.
    15. Yacine, Youssef & Loeuille, Nicolas, 2022. "Stable coexistence in plant-pollinator-herbivore communities requires balanced mutualistic vs antagonistic interactions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 465(C).
    16. Guangzhou Wang & Haley M. Burrill & Laura Y. Podzikowski & Maarten B. Eppinga & Fusuo Zhang & Junling Zhang & Peggy A. Schultz & James D. Bever, 2023. "Dilution of specialist pathogens drives productivity benefits from diversity in plant mixtures," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    17. Torres-Alruiz, Maria Daniela & Rodríguez, Diego J., 2013. "A topo-dynamical perspective to evaluate indirect interactions in trophic webs: New indexes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 363-369.
    18. Perc, Matjaž, 2007. "Effects of small-world connectivity on noise-induced temporal and spatial order in neural media," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 280-291.
    19. Kwikiriza, Norman & Katungi, Enid & Horna, Daniela, 2011. "Estimating the role of spatial varietal diversity on crop productivity within an abatement framework: The case of banana in Uganda," IFPRI discussion papers 01051, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    20. Cecilia Bellora & Élodie Blanc & Jean-Marc Bourgeon & Eric Strobl, 2018. "Estimating the Impact of Crop Diversity on Agricultural Productivity in South Africa," NBER Chapters, in: Agricultural Productivity and Producer Behavior, pages 185-215, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:424:y:2020:i:c:s0304380020300910. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.