IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v418y2020ics0304380019304260.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Bayesian inversion framework to evaluate parameter and predictive inference of a simple soil respiration model in a cool-temperate forest in western Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Toda, Motomu
  • Doi, Kazuki
  • Ishihara, Masae I.
  • Azuma, Wakana A.
  • Yokozawa, Masayuki

Abstract

Careful modelling of soil carbon sequestration is essential to evaluate future terrestrial feedback to the earth climate system through atmosphere–surface carbon exchange. Few studies have evaluated, in bio- and geo-applications, parameter and predictive uncertainty of soil respiration models by considering the difference between observations and model predictions; i.e. residual error, which is assumed neither to be independent nor to be described by a normal (i.e. Gaussian) probability distribution with a mean of zero and constant variance. In this paper, we use 2-year observations of soil carbon flux from 2017 to 2018 (hereafter referred to as ‘long-term simulation’) obtained with two open-top chambers to estimate parameter and predictive uncertainty of a simple soil respiration model based on Bayesian statistics in a cool-temperate forest in western Japan. We also use a Gaussian innovative residual error model in which a generalised likelihood uncertainty estimation that accounts for correlated, heteroscedastic, non-normally distributed (i.e. non-Gaussian) residual error flexibly handles statistics varying in skewness and kurtosis. Results show that the effects of correlation and heteroscedasticity were eliminated adequately. Additionally, the posterior distribution of the residuals had a pattern intermediate to those of Gaussian and Laplacian (or double-exponential) distributions. Consequently, the predicted soil respiration rate, and range of uncertainty therein, well-matched the observational data. Furthermore, we compare results of parameter and predictive inference of the soil respiration model from the long-term simulation with those constrained of short-term simulations (i.e. 4-month subsets of the 2-year dataset) to determine the extent to which the approach used affects the estimation of parameter and predictive uncertainty. No significant difference in parameter estimates was found between the long-term simulation versus any of the short-term simulations, whereas short-term simulation analysis of the uncertainty at 50 %—i.e. between the lower (25 %) and upper (75 %) quartiles of the probability range—indicated distinctive variations in model parameters in summer when more vigorous activity of trees and organisms promotes carbon cycling between the atmosphere and ecosystem. Overall we demonstrate that the Bayesian inversion approach is useful as a means by which to evaluate effectively parameter and predictive uncertainty of a soil respiration model with precise representation of residual errors.

Suggested Citation

  • Toda, Motomu & Doi, Kazuki & Ishihara, Masae I. & Azuma, Wakana A. & Yokozawa, Masayuki, 2020. "A Bayesian inversion framework to evaluate parameter and predictive inference of a simple soil respiration model in a cool-temperate forest in western Japan," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 418(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:418:y:2020:i:c:s0304380019304260
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.108918
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380019304260
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.108918?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tomohiro Ando, 2007. "Bayesian predictive information criterion for the evaluation of hierarchical Bayesian and empirical Bayes models," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 94(2), pages 443-458.
    2. Hashimoto, Shoji & Morishita, Tomoaki & Sakata, Tadashi & Ishizuka, Shigehiro & Kaneko, Shinji & Takahashi, Masamichi, 2011. "Simple models for soil CO2, CH4, and N2O fluxes calibrated using a Bayesian approach and multi-site data," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(7), pages 1283-1292.
    3. Markus Reichstein & Michael Bahn & Philippe Ciais & Dorothea Frank & Miguel D. Mahecha & Sonia I. Seneviratne & Jakob Zscheischler & Christian Beer & Nina Buchmann & David C. Frank & Dario Papale & An, 2013. "Climate extremes and the carbon cycle," Nature, Nature, vol. 500(7462), pages 287-295, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tomohiro Ando & Ruey S. Tsay, 2009. "Model selection for generalized linear models with factor‐augmented predictors," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(3), pages 207-235, May.
    2. Huicai Yang & Shuqin Zhao & Zhanfei Qin & Zhiguo Qi & Xinying Jiao & Zhen Li, 2024. "Differentiation of Carbon Sink Enhancement Potential in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Bai, Jushan & Ando, Tomohiro, 2013. "Multifactor asset pricing with a large number of observable risk factors and unobservable common and group-specific factors," MPRA Paper 52785, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Dec 2013.
    4. Yujin Li & Juying Jiao & Zhijie Wang & Binting Cao & Yanhong Wei & Shu Hu, 2016. "Effects of Revegetation on Soil Organic Carbon Storage and Erosion-Induced Carbon Loss under Extreme Rainstorms in the Hill and Gully Region of the Loess Plateau," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, April.
    5. Simon Besnard & Nuno Carvalhais & M Altaf Arain & Andrew Black & Benjamin Brede & Nina Buchmann & Jiquan Chen & Jan G P W Clevers & Loïc P Dutrieux & Fabian Gans & Martin Herold & Martin Jung & Yoshik, 2019. "Memory effects of climate and vegetation affecting net ecosystem CO2 fluxes in global forests," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-22, February.
    6. Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz & Adam Choryński & Janusz Olejnik & Hans J. Schellnhuber & Marek Urbaniak & Klaudia Ziemblińska, 2023. "Climate Change Science and Policy—A Guided Tour across the Space of Attitudes and Outcomes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, March.
    7. Zheng Fu & Philippe Ciais & I. Colin Prentice & Pierre Gentine & David Makowski & Ana Bastos & Xiangzhong Luo & Julia K. Green & Paul C. Stoy & Hui Yang & Tomohiro Hajima, 2022. "Atmospheric dryness reduces photosynthesis along a large range of soil water deficits," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    8. Isabel Dorado-Liñán & Blanca Ayarzagüena & Flurin Babst & Guobao Xu & Luis Gil & Giovanna Battipaglia & Allan Buras & Vojtěch Čada & J. Julio Camarero & Liam Cavin & Hugues Claessens & Igor Drobyshev , 2022. "Jet stream position explains regional anomalies in European beech forest productivity and tree growth," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    9. Meenakshi Sharma & Rajesh Kaushal & Prashant Kaushik & Seeram Ramakrishna, 2021. "Carbon Farming: Prospects and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-15, October.
    10. Patricia Arrogante-Funes & Carlos J. Novillo & Raúl Romero-Calcerrada, 2018. "Monitoring NDVI Inter-Annual Behavior in Mountain Areas of Mainland Spain (2001–2016)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-24, November.
    11. Yuhong Zhao & Ruirui Liu & Zhansheng Liu & Liang Liu & Jingjing Wang & Wenxiang Liu, 2023. "A Review of Macroscopic Carbon Emission Prediction Model Based on Machine Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-28, April.
    12. Tomohiro Ando, 2012. "Bayesian portfolio selection under a multifactor asset return model with predictive model selection," Global Business and Economics Review, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(1/2), pages 77-101.
    13. Lopes, António M. & Machado, J.A. Tenreiro, 2017. "Computational comparison and pattern visualization of forest fires," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 407-413.
    14. Ando, Tomohiro, 2009. "Bayesian inference for the hazard term structure with functional predictors using Bayesian predictive information criteria," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(6), pages 1925-1939, April.
    15. Zellner, Arnold & Ando, Tomohiro, 2010. "A direct Monte Carlo approach for Bayesian analysis of the seemingly unrelated regression model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 159(1), pages 33-45, November.
    16. Zefeng Chen & Weiguang Wang & Giovanni Forzieri & Alessandro Cescatti, 2024. "Transition from positive to negative indirect CO2 effects on the vegetation carbon uptake," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    17. Wenmin Zhang & Guy Schurgers & Josep Peñuelas & Rasmus Fensholt & Hui Yang & Jing Tang & Xiaowei Tong & Philippe Ciais & Martin Brandt, 2023. "Recent decrease of the impact of tropical temperature on the carbon cycle linked to increased precipitation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-9, December.
    18. Yuki Kawakubo & Tatsuya Kubokawa & Muni S. Srivastava, 2015. "A Variant of AIC Using Bayesian Marginal Likelihood," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-971, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    19. John M. Humphreys & Robert B. Srygley & David H. Branson, 2022. "Geographic Variation in Migratory Grasshopper Recruitment under Projected Climate Change," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-19, January.
    20. Xiangzhong Luo & Trevor F. Keenan, 2022. "Tropical extreme droughts drive long-term increase in atmospheric CO2 growth rate variability," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:418:y:2020:i:c:s0304380019304260. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.