IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v220y2009i5p684-693.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do plant–pollinator interaction networks result from stochastic processes?

Author

Listed:
  • Kallimanis, A.S.
  • Petanidou, T.
  • Tzanopoulos, J.
  • Pantis, J.D.
  • Sgardelis, S.P.

Abstract

Plant–pollinator interaction networks are characterized by several features that cannot be obtained from a totally random network (e.g. nestedness, power law distribution of degree specialization, temporal turnover). One reason is that both plants and pollinators are active for only a part of the year, and so a plant species flowering in spring cannot interact with a pollinator species that is active only in autumn. In this paper we build a stochastic model to simulate the plant–pollinator interaction network, taking into account the duration of activity of each species. To build the model we used an empirical plant–pollinator network from a Mediterranean scrub community surveyed over four years. In our simulated annual cycle we know which plant and pollinator species are active, and thus available to interact. We can obtain simulated plant–pollinator interaction networks with properties similar to the real ones in two different ways: (i) by assuming that the frequency distribution of both plant and pollinator duration of activity follow an exponential function, and that interaction among temporally coexisting species are totally random, and (ii) by assuming more realistic frequency distributions (exponential for pollinators, lognormal for plants) and that the interaction among coexisting species is occurring on a per capita basis. In the latter case we assume that there is a positive relationship between abundance and duration of activity. In our model the starting date of the species activity had little influence on the network structure. We conclude that the observed plant–pollinator network properties can be produced stochastically, and the mechanism shaping the network is not necessarily related to size constraints. Under such conditions co-evolutionary explanations should be given with caution.

Suggested Citation

  • Kallimanis, A.S. & Petanidou, T. & Tzanopoulos, J. & Pantis, J.D. & Sgardelis, S.P., 2009. "Do plant–pollinator interaction networks result from stochastic processes?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(5), pages 684-693.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:220:y:2009:i:5:p:684-693
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.11.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380008005474
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.11.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sabbadin, Régis & Spring, Danny & Rabier, Charles-Elie, 2007. "Dynamic reserve site selection under contagion risk of deforestation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 201(1), pages 75-81.
    2. Esther, Alexandra & Groeneveld, Jürgen & Enright, Neal J. & Miller, Ben P. & Lamont, Byron B. & Perry, George L.W. & Schurr, Frank M. & Jeltsch, Florian, 2008. "Assessing the importance of seed immigration on coexistence of plant functional types in a species-rich ecosystem," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 213(3), pages 402-416.
    3. Bode, Michael & Possingham, Hugh, 2007. "Can culling a threatened species increase its chance of persisting?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 201(1), pages 11-18.
    4. Caplat, Paul & Anand, Madhur & Bauch, Chris, 2008. "Symmetric competition causes population oscillations in an individual-based model of forest dynamics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 211(3), pages 491-500.
    5. Roth, James D. & Murray, Dennis L. & Steury, Todd D., 2008. "Spatial dynamics of sympatric canids: Modeling the impact of coyotes on red wolf recovery," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 214(2), pages 391-403.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Giannini, T.C. & Pinto, C.E. & Acosta, A.L. & Taniguchi, M. & Saraiva, A.M. & Alves-dos-Santos, I., 2013. "Interactions at large spatial scale: The case of Centris bees and floral oil producing plants in South America," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 258(C), pages 74-81.
    2. Stock, Michiel & Piot, Niels & Vanbesien, Sarah & Vaissière, Bernard & Coiffait-Gombault, Clémentine & Smagghe, Guy & De Baets, Bernard, 2020. "Information content in pollination network reveals missing interactions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 431(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anand, Madhur & Langille, Aaron, 2010. "A model-based method for estimating effective dispersal distance in tropical plant populations," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 77(4), pages 219-226.
    2. Kočišová, J. & Horváth, D. & Brutovský, B., 2009. "The efficiency of individual optimization in the conditions of competitive growth," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 388(17), pages 3585-3592.
    3. Henzler, Julia & Weise, Hanna & Enright, Neal J. & Zander, Susanne & Tietjen, Britta, 2018. "A squeeze in the suitable fire interval: Simulating the persistence of fire-killed plants in a Mediterranean-type ecosystem under drier conditions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 389(C), pages 41-49.
    4. Lennox, Gareth D. & Armsworth, Paul R., 2011. "Suitability of short or long conservation contracts under ecological and socio-economic uncertainty," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(15), pages 2856-2866.
    5. Xiao, Hui & Chadès, Iadine & Hill, Narelle & Murray, Nicholas & Fuller, Richard A. & McDonald-Madden, Eve, 2021. "Conserving migratory species while safeguarding ecosystem services," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 442(C).
    6. Hossein Sabzian & Mohammad Ali Shafia & Ali Maleki & Seyeed Mostapha Seyeed Hashemi & Ali Baghaei & Hossein Gharib, 2019. "Theories and Practice of Agent based Modeling: Some practical Implications for Economic Planners," Papers 1901.08932, arXiv.org.
    7. Mohd, Mohd Hafiz, 2019. "Diversity in interaction strength promotes rich dynamical behaviours in a three-species ecological system," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 353(C), pages 243-253.
    8. Picard, Nicolas, 2021. "The role of spatial competitive interactions between trees in shaping forest patterns," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 36-45.
    9. Mathieu Bonneau & Régis Sabbadin & Fred A Johnson & Bradley Stith, 2018. "Dynamic minimum set problem for reserve design: Heuristic solutions for large problems," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-23, March.
    10. Ngo-Hoang, Dai-Long, 2019. "A research paper of Hossein Sabzian (2019), Theories and Practice of Agent based Modeling: Some practical Implications for Economic Planners, ArXiv, 54p," AgriXiv xutyz, Center for Open Science.
    11. Herberich, Maximiliane Marion & Gayler, Sebastian & Anand, Madhur & Tielbörger, Katja, 2017. "Hydrological niche segregation of plant functional traits in an individual-based model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 356(C), pages 14-24.
    12. Sándor F. Tóth & Robert G. Haight & Luke W. Rogers, 2011. "Dynamic Reserve Selection: Optimal Land Retention with Land-Price Feedbacks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(5), pages 1059-1078, October.
    13. Hossein Sabzian & Mohammad Ali Shafia & Mehdi Ghazanfari & Ali Bonyadi Naeini, 2020. "Modeling the Adoption and Diffusion of Mobile Telecommunications Technologies in Iran: A Computational Approach Based on Agent-Based Modeling and Social Network Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-36, April.
    14. Hossein Sabzian & Alireza Aliahmadi & Adel Azar & Madjid Mirzaee, 2018. "Economic inequality and Islamic Charity: An exploratory agent-based modeling approach," Papers 1804.09284, arXiv.org.
    15. Kaitlyn Brown & Tamara Tambyah & Jack Fenwick & Patrick Grant & Michael Bode, 2022. "Choosing optimal trigger points for ex situ, in toto conservation of single population threatened species," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(4), pages 1-12, April.
    16. Marielle Brunette, 2011. "Une application du Processus de Décision de Markov au secteur forestier : risque de production, de prix et perte de qualité," Post-Print hal-01000606, HAL.
    17. Dissanayake, Sahan T.M. & Önal, Hayri, 2011. "Amenity driven price effects and conservation reserve site selection: A dynamic linear integer programming approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(12), pages 2225-2235.
    18. Couture, Stéphane & Cros, Marie-Josée & Sabbadin, Régis, 2016. "Risk aversion and optimal management of an uneven-aged forest under risk of windthrow: A Markov decision process approach," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 94-114.
    19. Rossington, Kate & Benson, Thomas, 2020. "An agent-based model to predict fish collisions with tidal stream turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 1220-1229.
    20. Park, Junpyo, 2021. "Evolutionary dynamics in the rock-paper-scissors system by changing community paradigm with population flow," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:220:y:2009:i:5:p:684-693. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.