IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v201y2007i1p11-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can culling a threatened species increase its chance of persisting?

Author

Listed:
  • Bode, Michael
  • Possingham, Hugh

Abstract

Many interacting predator–prey populations have a natural tendency to exhibit persistent limit-cycles or damped oscillations, especially in the presence of environmental stochasticity. The restriction of populations into small conservation reserves reduces the scale of ecosystems, and can induce cycling in previously stable predator–prey relationships. During the course of these cycles, the abundance of both predator and prey regularly decrease to low levels. At these times, environmental and demographic stochasticity may cause the extinction of one of the populations. Could culling one or both species at critical times reduce their probability of extinction? We use stochastic dynamic programming to determine the optimal management strategy for oscillation-prone species pairs. Remarkably, if the interventions are enacted at the appropriate time, infrequent culling of a small number of individuals significantly reduces the probability of extinction of the predator. Our approach can be applied to many different ecosystems, and can incorporate more complex system dynamics without a significant increase in computational time.

Suggested Citation

  • Bode, Michael & Possingham, Hugh, 2007. "Can culling a threatened species increase its chance of persisting?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 201(1), pages 11-18.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:201:y:2007:i:1:p:11-18
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.07.038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380006003516
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.07.038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kaitlyn Brown & Tamara Tambyah & Jack Fenwick & Patrick Grant & Michael Bode, 2022. "Choosing optimal trigger points for ex situ, in toto conservation of single population threatened species," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(4), pages 1-12, April.
    2. Kallimanis, A.S. & Petanidou, T. & Tzanopoulos, J. & Pantis, J.D. & Sgardelis, S.P., 2009. "Do plant–pollinator interaction networks result from stochastic processes?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(5), pages 684-693.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:201:y:2007:i:1:p:11-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.