IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolec/v233y2025ics0921800925000874.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal pricing of protected areas under multiple sites demand models

Author

Listed:
  • Vásquez-Lavín, Felipe
  • Leiva, Mauricio
  • Campos-Requena, Nelyda

Abstract

This study extends Alpízar's (2006) price discrimination model for protected areas in nature-based tourism from a continuous demand to a discrete choice model. The original model provided a discrimination price solution for national and foreign visitors to a single site choice, limiting the model's application. Meanwhile, our extended model recognizes multiple recreational site options, each with a probability of being selected, including the likelihood of not choosing any site. We illustrate our theoretical model to evaluate the optimal pricing for national and foreign visitors using Peru's two National Protected Areas. The results indicate a significant revenue increase when both sites' entrance fees are optimized. The discrete choice approach, with its flexibility, captures substitution patterns among recreational sites, increasing the realism of the tool for policymakers and park managers. Our model can enhance sustainable nature-based tourism management by aligning discriminatory entrance fees with economic theory to ensure protected areas' long-term viability.

Suggested Citation

  • Vásquez-Lavín, Felipe & Leiva, Mauricio & Campos-Requena, Nelyda, 2025. "Optimal pricing of protected areas under multiple sites demand models," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:233:y:2025:i:c:s0921800925000874
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108604
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800925000874
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108604?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. von Haefen R.H. & Phaneuf D.J. & Parsons G.R., 2004. "Estimation and Welfare Analysis With Large Demand Systems," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 22, pages 194-205, April.
    2. repec:cdl:agrebk:qt7z25t659 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Kelsi G. Hobbs & Albert N. Link & Christopher A. Swann, 2022. "The overcrowding of Zion National Park: is it a pricing problem?," Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(4), pages 351-360, October.
    4. Train,Kenneth E., 2009. "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521766555, May.
    5. Hanemann, Michael & Labandeira, Xavier & Labeaga, José M. & Vásquez-Lavín, Felipe, 2024. "Discrete-continuous models of residential energy demand: A comprehensive review," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    6. Palma, David & Hess, Stephane, 2022. "Extending the Multiple Discrete Continuous (MDC) modelling framework to consider complementarity, substitution, and an unobserved budget," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 13-35.
    7. Lin Song & Yi Xue & Yaqiong Jing & Jincan Zhang, 2021. "Visitor’s Willingness to Pay for National Park Entrance Fees in China: Evidence from a Contingent Valuation Method," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-14, December.
    8. Pandit, Ram & Dhakal, Maheshwar & Polyakov, Maksym, 2015. "Valuing access to protected areas in Nepal: The case of Chitwan National Park," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 1-12.
    9. Yongjie Ji & David A. Keiser & Catherine L. Kling & Daniel J. Phaneuf, 2022. "Revenue and Distributional Consequences of Alternative Outdoor Recreation Pricing Mechanisms: Evidence from a Micropanel Data Set," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 98(3), pages 478-494.
    10. Viteri Mejía, César & Brandt, Sylvia, 2015. "Managing tourism in the Galapagos Islands through price incentives: A choice experiment approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 1-11.
    11. Sinclair, Michael & Ghermandi, Andrea & Signorello, Giovanni & Giuffrida, Laura & De Salvo, Maria, 2022. "Valuing Recreation in Italy's Protected Areas Using Spatial Big Data," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    12. Mayer, Marius & Woltering, Manuel, 2018. "Assessing and valuing the recreational ecosystem services of Germany’s national parks using travel cost models," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(PC), pages 371-386.
    13. Johane Dikgang & Edwin Muchapondwa, 2017. "The determination of park fees in support of benefit sharing in Southern Africa," Tourism Economics, , vol. 23(6), pages 1165-1183, September.
    14. McConnell K. E., 1995. "Consumer Surplus from Discrete Choice Models," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 263-270, November.
    15. Weaver, David B. & Lawton, Laura J., 2017. "A new visitation paradigm for protected areas," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 140-146.
    16. F Ollier D Andrianambinina & Derek Schuurman & Mamy A Rakotoarijaona & Chantal N Razanajovy & Honorath M Ramparany & Serge C Rafanoharana & H Andry Rasamuel & Kevin D Faragher & Patrick O Waeber & Luc, 2023. "Boost the resilience of protected areas to shocks by reducing their dependency on tourism," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(4), pages 1-17, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thirumarpan, Krishnal & Robinson, Elizabeth, 2025. "Park pricing in theory and practice and implications for ecosystem and human health," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 127991, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Chorus, Caspar & van Cranenburgh, Sander & Daniel, Aemiro Melkamu & Sandorf, Erlend Dancke & Sobhani, Anae & Szép, Teodóra, 2021. "Obfuscation maximization-based decision-making: Theory, methodology and first empirical evidence," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 28-44.
    3. Kidokoro, Yukihiro, 2016. "A micro foundation for discrete choice models with multiple categories of goods," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 54-72.
    4. Bhat, Chandra R., 2008. "The multiple discrete-continuous extreme value (MDCEV) model: Role of utility function parameters, identification considerations, and model extensions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 274-303, March.
    5. Halkos, George & Aslanidis, Panagiotis-Stavros, 2025. "The Socio-Cultural and Spiritual Dimensions on Non-marketed Environmental Valuation," MPRA Paper 124961, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Estifanos, Tafesse & Polyakov, Maksym & Pandit, Ram & Hailu, Atakelty & Burton, Michael, "undated". "Protection of the Ethiopian Wolf: What are tourists willing to pay for?," Working Papers 272805, University of Western Australia, School of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    7. Chandra Bhat & Abdul Pinjari, 2014. "Multiple discrete-continuous choice models: a reflective analysis and a prospective view," Chapters, in: Stephane Hess & Andrew Daly (ed.), Handbook of Choice Modelling, chapter 19, pages 427-454, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Tafesse Estifanos & Maksym Polyakov & Ram Pandit & Atakelty Hailu & Michael Burton, 2021. "What are tourists willing to pay for securing the survival of a flagship species? The case of protection of the Ethiopian wolf," Tourism Economics, , vol. 27(1), pages 45-69, February.
    9. Gosens, Tom & Rouwendal, Jan, 2018. "Nature-based outdoor recreation trips: Duration, travel mode and location," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 513-530.
    10. Ida, Takanori & Takemura, Kosuke & Sato, Masayuki, 2015. "Inner conflict between nuclear power generation and electricity rates: A Japanese case study," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 61-69.
    11. Pellegrini, Andrea & Rose, John Matthew, 2025. "On allowing endogenous minimum consumption bounds in the multiple discrete continuous choice model: An application to expenditure patterns," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    12. Lloyd-Smith, Patrick, 2018. "A new approach to calculating welfare measures in Kuhn-Tucker demand models," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 19-27.
    13. Palma, David & Hess, Stephane, 2022. "Extending the Multiple Discrete Continuous (MDC) modelling framework to consider complementarity, substitution, and an unobserved budget," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 13-35.
    14. Pape, Louis-Daniel & Helmers, Christian & Iaria, Alessandro & Wagner, Stefan & Runge, Julian, 2025. "Personalized content, engagement, and monetization in a mobile puzzle game," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    15. Kuriyama, Koichi & Michael Hanemann, W. & Hilger, James R., 2010. "A latent segmentation approach to a Kuhn-Tucker model: An application to recreation demand," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 209-220, November.
    16. Sikder, Sujan & Pinjari, Abdul Rawoof, 2013. "The benefits of allowing heteroscedastic stochastic distributions in multiple discrete-continuous choice models," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 9(C), pages 39-56.
    17. Halkos, George & Leonti, Aikaterini & Petropoulos, Constantinos & Sardianou, Eleni, 2022. "Determinants of willingness to pay for urban parks: An empirical analysis in Greece," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    18. Yi-Hsing Lin & Chun-Hung Lee & Chun-Fu Hong & Yen-Ting Tung, 2022. "Marketing Strategy and Willingness to Pay for Sport Tourism in the Kinmen Marathon Event," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, September.
    19. Renato Perez Loyola & Erda Wang & Nannan Kang, 2021. "Economic valuation of recreational attributes using a choice experiment approach: An application to the Galapagos Islands," Tourism Economics, , vol. 27(1), pages 86-104, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:233:y:2025:i:c:s0921800925000874. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.