IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/127991.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Park pricing in theory and practice and implications for ecosystem and human health

Author

Listed:
  • Thirumarpan, Krishnal
  • Robinson, Elizabeth

Abstract

Though a rich literature addresses the theory of park pricing, less attention has been paid to the practical realities. In this narrative review article, we ask why the setting of national park entry fees varies in practice, and we link this back to the underlying theory, the empirical academic literature, and practical realities. Park entry pricing strategies tend to differ considerably in higher and lower-income countries, reflecting practical realities of how to fund a national park system. Parks in higher-income countries are often free at the point of entry, consistent with the efficient pricing of global public goods. In contrast, differential pricing for local and foreign tourists is common in lower-income countries, an example of price discrimination that increases overall park revenues. We highlight a number of areas for further research. First, the concept of fairness and equitable access is an important practical consideration, linked to who benefits from visiting parks versus who pays, but much more attention needs to be paid to this in the literature. Second, while there is increasing recognition of the importance of green spaces for health and well-being, the literature largely ignores how health considerations might influence park entry fees, suggesting that more research is needed at the nexus of pricing, health and well-being, and equitable access. Finally, many lower-income countries that have a high dependence on foreign visitor fees to fund their national park systems are vulnerable to global shocks, suggesting research is needed into how to increase long-term sustainability of funding sources.

Suggested Citation

  • Thirumarpan, Krishnal & Robinson, Elizabeth, 2025. "Park pricing in theory and practice and implications for ecosystem and human health," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 127991, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:127991
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/127991/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lisa C. Chase & David R. Lee & William D. Schulze & Deborah J. Anderson, 1998. "Ecotourism Demand and Differential Pricing of National Park Access in Costa Rica," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 74(4), pages 466-482.
    2. Kelsi G. Hobbs & Albert N. Link & Christopher A. Swann, 2022. "The overcrowding of Zion National Park: is it a pricing problem?," Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(4), pages 351-360, October.
    3. Wilson, Clevo Tis & Tisdell, Clem, 2004. "Attitudes to Entry Fees to National Parks: Results and Policy Implications from a Queensland Case Study," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 79-102, March.
    4. Lin Song & Yi Xue & Yaqiong Jing & Jincan Zhang, 2021. "Visitor’s Willingness to Pay for National Park Entrance Fees in China: Evidence from a Contingent Valuation Method," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Jianqiong Yuan & Jingjing Li & Jinyang Deng & Douglas Arbogast, 2021. "Past Experience and Willingness to Pay: A Comparative Examination of Destination Loyalty in Two National Parks, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-26, August.
    6. Samson Mukanjari & Edwin Muchapondwa & Eyoual Demeke, 2021. "Recreation demand and pricing policy for international tourists in developing countries: evidence from South Africa," Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 243-260, July.
    7. Shultz, Steven & Pinazzo, Jorge & Cifuentes, Miguel, 1998. "Opportunities and limitations of contingent valuation surveys to determine national park entrance fees: evidence from Costa Rica," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(1), pages 131-149, February.
    8. Samson Mukanjari & Herbert Ntuli & Edwin Muchapondwa, 2022. "Valuation of nature-based tourism using contingent valuation survey: evidence from South Africa," Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 331-349, July.
    9. Nir Becker, 2009. "A Comparative Analysis of the Pricing Systems of Nature Reserves," Tourism Economics, , vol. 15(1), pages 193-213, March.
    10. Melstrom, Richard T. & Vasarhelyi, Leah, 2019. "Modeling recreation demand and fees at national parks," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 175-178.
    11. Margaret Walls, 2022. "Economics of the US National Park System: Values, Funding, and Resource Management Challenges," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 14(1), pages 579-596, October.
    12. Johane Dikgang & Edwin Muchapondwa, 2017. "The determination of park fees in support of benefit sharing in Southern Africa," Tourism Economics, , vol. 23(6), pages 1165-1183, September.
    13. Robert W. Turner, 2002. "Market Failures and the Rationale for National Parks," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 347-356, December.
    14. Paul C. Sutton & Sophia L. Duncan & Sharolyn J. Anderson, 2019. "Valuing Our National Parks: An Ecological Economics Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-17, March.
    15. Poudyal, Neelam C. & Paudel, Bamadev & Tarrant, Michael A., 2013. "A time series analysis of the impact of recession on national park visitation in the United States," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 181-189.
    16. Richard Mulwa & Jane Kabubo-Mariara & Wilfred Nyangena, 2018. "Recreational value and optimal pricing of national parks: lessons from Maasai Mara in Kenya," Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 204-222, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francisco López-del-Pino & José M. Grisolía, 2018. "Pricing Beach Congestion," Tourism Economics, , vol. 24(4), pages 449-472, June.
    2. Brian Witt, 2019. "Tourists’ Willingness to Pay Increased Entrance Fees at Mexican Protected Areas: A Multi-Site Contingent Valuation Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Vásquez-Lavín, Felipe & Leiva, Mauricio & Campos-Requena, Nelyda, 2025. "Optimal pricing of protected areas under multiple sites demand models," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    4. Amjad Ali & Arshad Ali Shedayi, 2025. "Willingness to pay as an economic instrument for managing nature-based tourism in Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 1-20, January.
    5. Viteri Mejía, César & Brandt, Sylvia, 2015. "Managing tourism in the Galapagos Islands through price incentives: A choice experiment approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 1-11.
    6. repec:rza:wpaper:743 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Ellingson, Lindsey & Seidl, Andrew, 2007. "Comparative analysis of non-market valuation techniques for the Eduardo Avaroa Reserve, Bolivia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 517-525, January.
    8. Halkos, George & Leonti, Aikaterini & Petropoulos, Constantinos & Sardianou, Eleni, 2022. "Determinants of willingness to pay for urban parks: An empirical analysis in Greece," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    9. Capucine Chapel & Mohamed Hilal & Julie Le Gallo, 2025. "Review and challenges in the economic valuation of green spaces," Economics and Business Letters, Oviedo University Press, vol. 14(1), pages 63-74.
    10. Heidi J. Albers, 2022. "Protected Area Network Expansion and Management: Economics to improve conservation outcomes," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 83(4), pages 955-972, December.
    11. Capucine Chapel & Mohamed Hilal & Julie Le Gallo, 2025. "Review and challenges in the economic valuation of green spaces," Post-Print hal-05022473, HAL.
    12. Shrestha, Ram K. & Loomis, John B., 2001. "Testing a meta-analysis model for benefit transfer in international outdoor recreation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 67-83, October.
    13. Sekar, Nitin & Weiss, Jack M. & Dobson, Andrew P., 2014. "Willingness-to-pay and the perfect safari:Valuation and cultural evaluation of safari package attributes in the Serengeti and Tanzanian Northern Circuit," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 34-41.
    14. Alpizar, Francisco, 2006. "The pricing of protected areas in nature-based tourism: A local perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 294-307, February.
    15. Yanju Luo & Jinyang Deng & Chad Pierskalla & Ju-hyoung Lee & Jiayao Tang, 2022. "New Ecological Paradigm, Leisure Motivation, and Wellbeing Satisfaction: A Comparative Analysis of Recreational Use of Urban Parks before and after the COVID-19 Outbreak," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-28, August.
    16. Ksenija DumiÄ ić & Josip Mikulić & Anita ÄŒeh ÄŒasni, 2017. "Tourism spending behaviour before and after the 2008 financial crisis," Tourism Economics, , vol. 23(1), pages 223-228, February.
    17. Robert Turner, 2013. "Using contingent choice surveys to inform national park management," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 3(2), pages 120-138, June.
    18. Ms. Evridiki Tsounta, 2008. "What Attracts Tourists to Paradise?," IMF Working Papers 2008/277, International Monetary Fund.
    19. Baral, Nabin & Stern, Marc J. & Bhattarai, Ranju, 2008. "Contingent valuation of ecotourism in Annapurna conservation area, Nepal: Implications for sustainable park finance and local development," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(2-3), pages 218-227, June.
    20. Catherine M. H. Keske & Adam Mayer, 2014. "Visitor Willingness to Pay U.S. Forest Service Recreation Fees in New West Rural Mountain Economies," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 28(1), pages 87-100, February.
    21. Paulo A.L.D. Nunes & Elena Ojea & Maria Loureiro, 2009. "Mapping of Forest Biodiversity Values: A Plural Perspective," Working Papers 2009.4, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • N0 - Economic History - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:127991. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.