IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolec/v196y2022ics0921800922000805.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incorporating economics into fishery policies: Developing integrated ecological-economics harvest control rules

Author

Listed:
  • Rosa, Renato
  • Costa, Tiago
  • Mota, Rui Pedro

Abstract

Despite the efforts of management authorities, several fish stocks continue to be harvested at unsustainable levels. While integrating economics into catch advice has been identified as key in developing more effective management, few studies investigate how bioeconomic modelling can inform decision-making. At the same time, increasing evidence has been gathered on the occurrence of regime shifts in marine ecosystems, raising greater concerns regarding fish stocks' recovery ability. Policy evaluation methods, however, still resort to compensation population models. As a result, these may overestimate reproductive success, thus jeopardizing the design and evaluation of stock rebuilding policies. This paper addresses those challenges proposing a methodology that approximates a harvest control rule using an age-structured bioeconomic model. As a result, we deliver a policy rule that complies with current advice procedures and endogenously captures economics. Also, we consider concerns on the existence of regime shifts in marine populations and estimate a bioeconomic model with critical depensation. Results from our case study suggest that policies neglecting the existence of critical depensation may compromise stock rebuilding objectives and might even result in fishery collapses. Using bioeconomic modelling to define harvest control rules may enhance policy design aimed at reconciling fisheries' economic returns and stock recovery.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosa, Renato & Costa, Tiago & Mota, Rui Pedro, 2022. "Incorporating economics into fishery policies: Developing integrated ecological-economics harvest control rules," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:196:y:2022:i:c:s0921800922000805
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107418
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800922000805
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107418?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Renato Rosa & João Vaz & Rui Mota & Alexandra Silva, 2018. "Preference for Landings’ Smoothing and Risk of Collapse in Optimal Fishery Policies: The Ibero-Atlantic Sardine Fishery," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 71(4), pages 875-895, December.
    2. Polasky, Stephen & de Zeeuw, Aart & Wagener, Florian, 2011. "Optimal management with potential regime shifts," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 229-240, September.
    3. José-María Da-Rocha & Rosa Mato-Amboage, 2016. "On the Benefits of Including Age-Structure in Harvest Control Rules," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 64(4), pages 619-641, August.
    4. Ren, Bijie & Polasky, Stephen, 2014. "The optimal management of renewable resources under the risk of potential regime shift," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 195-212.
    5. Tahvonen, Olli & Quaas, Martin F. & Voss, Rüdiger, 2018. "Harvesting selectivity and stochastic recruitment in economic models of age-structured fisheries," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 659-676.
    6. Ute Kapaun & Martin Quaas, 2013. "Does the Optimal Size of a Fish Stock Increase with Environmental Uncertainties?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 54(2), pages 293-310, February.
    7. Olli Tahvonen & Martin Quaas & Jörn Schmidt & Rudi Voss, 2013. "Optimal Harvesting of an Age-Structured Schooling Fishery," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 54(1), pages 21-39, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haoran Pan & Pierre Failler & Qianyi Du & Christos Floros & Loretta Malvarosa & Emmanuel Chassot & Vincenzo Placenti, 2022. "An Inter-Temporal Computable General Equilibrium Model for Fisheries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Mota, Rui Pedro & Nichols, Rachel, 2023. "Habitat considerations in optimal fisheries recovery," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kelsall, Claudia & Quaas, Martin F. & Quérou, Nicolas, 2023. "Risk aversion in renewable resource harvesting," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    2. Jules Selles, 2018. "Fisheries management: what uncertainties matter?," Working Papers hal-01824238, HAL.
    3. Nkuiya, Bruno & Diekert, Florian, 2023. "Stochastic growth and regime shift risk in renewable resource management," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    4. Christopher Costello & Bruno Nkuiya & Nicolas Querou, 2017. "Extracting spatial resources under possible regime shift," Working Papers 17-07, LAMETA, Universtiy of Montpellier.
    5. Ni, Yuanming & Steinshamn, Stein I. & Kvamsdal, Sturla F., 2022. "Negative shocks in an age-structured bioeconomic model and how to deal with them," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 15-30.
    6. Maria Arvaniti & Chandra K. Krishnamurthy & Anne-Sophie Crépin, 2019. "Time-consistent resource management with regime shifts," CER-ETH Economics working paper series 19/329, CER-ETH - Center of Economic Research (CER-ETH) at ETH Zurich.
    7. Can Askan Mavi & Nicolas Quérou, 2020. "Common pool resource management and risk perceptions," DEM Discussion Paper Series 20-25, Department of Economics at the University of Luxembourg.
    8. Gustav Engström & Johan Gars, 2016. "Climatic Tipping Points and Optimal Fossil-Fuel Use," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 65(3), pages 541-571, November.
    9. Sturla F. Kvamsdal, 2022. "Optimal Management of a Renewable Resource Under Multiple Regimes," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 81(3), pages 481-499, March.
    10. Mavi, Can Askan, 2020. "Can harmful events be another source of environmental traps?," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 29-46.
    11. Eric Nævdal, 2024. "Exogenous Hazard Rates and Precautionary Behaviour in Resource Economic Dynamics," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 87(10), pages 2543-2569, October.
    12. Sareh Vosooghi, 2019. "Panic-Based Overfishing in Transboundary Fisheries," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 73(4), pages 1287-1313, August.
    13. Nkuiya, Bruno & Costello, Christopher, 2016. "Pollution control under a possible future shift in environmental preferences," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 132(PB), pages 193-205.
    14. Miller, Steve & Nkuiya, Bruno, 2016. "Coalition formation in fisheries with potential regime shift," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 189-207.
    15. Thomas S. Lontzek & Daiju Narita & Ole Wilms, 2016. "Stochastic Integrated Assessment of Ecosystem Tipping Risk," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 65(3), pages 573-598, November.
    16. Voss, Rudi & Quaas, Martin F. & Schmidt, Jörn O. & Stoeven, Max T. & Francis, Tessa B. & Levin, Phillip S. & Armitage, Derek R. & Cleary, Jaclyn S. & Jones, R. Russ & Lee, Lynn C. & Okamoto, Daniel K., 2018. "Quantifying the benefits of spatial fisheries management – An ecological-economic optimization approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 385(C), pages 165-172.
    17. Diekert, Florian K., 2017. "Threatening thresholds? The effect of disastrous regime shifts on the non-cooperative use of environmental goods and services," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 30-49.
    18. Baggio, Michele & Fackler, Paul L., 2016. "Optimal management with reversible regime shifts," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 132(PB), pages 124-136.
    19. Renato Rosa & João Vaz & Rui Mota & Alexandra Silva, 2018. "Preference for Landings’ Smoothing and Risk of Collapse in Optimal Fishery Policies: The Ibero-Atlantic Sardine Fishery," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 71(4), pages 875-895, December.
    20. Martin F. Quaas & Max T. Stoeven & Bernd Klauer & Thomas Petersen & Johannes Schiller, 2018. "Windows of Opportunity for Sustainable Fisheries Management: The Case of Eastern Baltic Cod," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 70(2), pages 323-341, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:196:y:2022:i:c:s0921800922000805. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.