IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecmode/v148y2025ics0264999325000677.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploiting mixed-frequency characteristics in parametric Mean-Expected Shortfall portfolio selection

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Shuting
  • Zhang, Sicheng
  • Chen, Yun

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the role of mixed-frequency characteristics in portfolio selection. We introduce a novel parametric Mean-Expected Shortfall model which establishes direct linkages between portfolio weights and mixed-frequency characteristics. The model solution is converted into a penalized MIDAS expectile regression problem, which not only reduces computational costs, but also identifies the crucial characteristics. An empirical analysis of the CSI 300 index reveals that incorporating mixed-frequency characteristics significantly enhances portfolio performance. The proposed method consistently outperforms other competing models by delivering substantially lower risk and markedly higher risk-adjusted returns. Further coefficient analysis highlights crucial characteristics exerting significant impacts on portfolio weights. Specifically, accumulation distribution and market value demonstrate positive influences, while moving averages, relative strength index, liquidity, and book-to-market ratio exhibit negative impacts. These findings provide investors with valuable tool for asset allocation, enhancing interpretability and reliability in complex data environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Shuting & Zhang, Sicheng & Chen, Yun, 2025. "Exploiting mixed-frequency characteristics in parametric Mean-Expected Shortfall portfolio selection," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:148:y:2025:i:c:s0264999325000677
    DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2025.107072
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264999325000677
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.econmod.2025.107072?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shuang Zhao & Wanbo Lu & Muhammad Wajid Raza & Dong Yang, 2021. "Can Mixed-Frequency Data Improve the Higher-Order Moments Portfolio Performance?," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(15), pages 4473-4493, December.
    2. Eric Ghysels & Arthur Sinko & Rossen Valkanov, 2007. "MIDAS Regressions: Further Results and New Directions," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 53-90.
    3. Gilbert W. Bassett, 2004. "Pessimistic Portfolio Allocation and Choquet Expected Utility," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 2(4), pages 477-492.
    4. Gilbert W. Bassett Jr Bassett & Roger Koenker & Gregory Kordas, 2004. "Pessimistic portfolio allocation and Choquet expected utility," CeMMAP working papers 09/04, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    5. Wang, Ruina & Li, Jinfang, 2021. "The influence and predictive powers of mixed-frequency individual stock sentiment on stock returns," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    6. Gruszka, Jarosław & Szwabiński, Janusz, 2021. "Advanced strategies of portfolio management in the Heston market model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 574(C).
    7. Xu, Qifa & Zhou, Yingying & Jiang, Cuixia & Yu, Keming & Niu, Xufeng, 2016. "A large CVaR-based portfolio selection model with weight constraints," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 436-447.
    8. Ammann, Manuel & Coqueret, Guillaume & Schade, Jan-Philip, 2016. "Characteristics-based portfolio choice with leverage constraints," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 23-37.
    9. Giovanni Bonaccolto & Massimiliano Caporin & Sandra Paterlini, 2018. "Asset allocation strategies based on penalized quantile regression," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 1-32, January.
    10. Caldeira, João F. & Santos, André A.P. & Torrent, Hudson S., 2023. "Semiparametric portfolios: Improving portfolio performance by exploiting non-linearities in firm characteristics," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    11. Liu, Li & Pan, Zhiyuan, 2020. "Forecasting stock market volatility: The role of technical variables," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 55-65.
    12. Sun, Kaisi & Wang, Hui & Zhu, Yifeng, 2024. "What drives the tail risk effect in the Chinese stock market?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    13. Xia Han & Bin Wang & Ruodu Wang & Qinyu Wu, 2024. "Risk concentration and the mean‐expected shortfall criterion," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 819-846, July.
    14. Mosoeu, Selebogo & Kodongo, Odongo, 2022. "The Fama-French five-factor model and emerging market equity returns," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 55-76.
    15. Tan, Xilong & Tao, Yubo, 2023. "Trend-based forecast of cryptocurrency returns," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    16. Michael W. Brandt & Pedro Santa-Clara & Rossen Valkanov, 2009. "Parametric Portfolio Policies: Exploiting Characteristics in the Cross-Section of Equity Returns," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 22(9), pages 3411-3447, September.
    17. Xu, Qifa & Chen, Lu & Jiang, Cuixia & Yu, Keming, 2020. "Mixed data sampling expectile regression with applications to measuring financial risk," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 469-486.
    18. Tumala, Mohammed M. & Salisu, Afees & Nmadu, Yaaba B., 2023. "Climate change and fossil fuel prices: A GARCH-MIDAS analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    19. Eric Ghysels & Alberto Plazzi & Rossen Valkanov, 2016. "Why Invest in Emerging Markets? The Role of Conditional Return Asymmetry," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 71(5), pages 2145-2192, October.
    20. Murat Körs & Mehmet Baha Karan, 2023. "Stock exchange volatility forecasting under market stress with MIDAS regression," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(1), pages 295-306, January.
    21. Le, Trung H., 2021. "International portfolio allocation: The role of conditional higher moments," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 33-57.
    22. Shen, Yiran & Liu, Chang & Sun, Xiaolei & Guo, Kun, 2023. "Investor sentiment and the Chinese new energy stock market: A risk–return perspective," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 395-408.
    23. Cui, Tianxiang & Ding, Shusheng & Jin, Huan & Zhang, Yongmin, 2023. "Portfolio constructions in cryptocurrency market: A CVaR-based deep reinforcement learning approach," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    24. Hung, Chiayu & Lai, Hung-Neng, 2022. "Information asymmetry and the profitability of technical analysis," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    25. Li, Zhiyong & Rao, Xiao, 2022. "Evaluating asset pricing models: A revised factor model for China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    26. Santos, André A.P. & Torrent, Hudson S., 2022. "Markowitz meets technical analysis: Building optimal portfolios by exploiting information in trend-following signals," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    27. Victor DeMiguel & Alberto Martín-Utrera & Francisco J Nogales & Raman Uppal, 2020. "A Transaction-Cost Perspective on the Multitude of Firm Characteristics," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 33(5), pages 2180-2222.
    28. Hui Zou & Trevor Hastie, 2005. "Addendum: Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(5), pages 768-768, November.
    29. Eric Ghysels, 2014. "Conditional Skewness with Quantile Regression Models: SoFiE Presidential Address and a Tribute to Hal White," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 12(4), pages 620-644.
    30. Chen, Tsung-Yu & Chao, Ching-Hsiang & Wu, Zhen-Xing, 2021. "Does the turnover effect matter in emerging markets? Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    31. Laborda, Ricardo & Olmo, Jose, 2017. "Optimal asset allocation for strategic investors," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 970-987.
    32. Yuan, Ming, 2006. "GACV for quantile smoothing splines," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 813-829, February.
    33. Fama, Eugene F & French, Kenneth R, 1996. "Multifactor Explanations of Asset Pricing Anomalies," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 51(1), pages 55-84, March.
    34. Jonathan Fletcher, 2017. "Exploring the benefits of using stock characteristics in optimal portfolio strategies," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 192-210, February.
    35. Jying‐Nan Wang & Hung‐Chun Liu & Jiangze Du & Yuan‐Teng Hsu, 2019. "Economic benefits of technical analysis in portfolio management: Evidence from global stock markets," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(2), pages 890-902, April.
    36. Adam Zaremba, 2019. "The Cross Section of Country Equity Returns: A Review of Empirical Literature," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-26, October.
    37. Newey, Whitney K & Powell, James L, 1987. "Asymmetric Least Squares Estimation and Testing," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 55(4), pages 819-847, July.
    38. Hui Zou & Trevor Hastie, 2005. "Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(2), pages 301-320, April.
    39. Yensen Ni & Yi-Ching Liao & Paoyu Huang, 2015. "Momentum in the Chinese Stock Market: Evidence from Stochastic Oscillator Indicators," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(S1), pages 99-110, January.
    40. Alan Moreira & Tyler Muir, 2017. "Volatility-Managed Portfolios," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 72(4), pages 1611-1644, August.
    41. James W. Taylor, 2008. "Estimating Value at Risk and Expected Shortfall Using Expectiles," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 6(2), pages 231-252, Spring.
    42. Manuel Ammann & Guillaume Coqueret & Jan-Philip Schade, 2016. "Characteristics-based portfolio choice with leverage constraints," Post-Print hal-02009129, HAL.
    43. Ben Abdelaziz, Fouad & Chibane, Messaoud, 2023. "Portfolio optimization in the presence of tail correlation," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    44. Yao, Qiwei & Tong, Howell, 1996. "Asymmetric least squares regression estimation: a nonparametric approach," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 19423, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    45. Manuel Ammann & Guillaume Coqueret & Jan-Philip Schade, 2016. "Characteristics-based portfolio choice with leverage constraints," Post-Print hal-02312221, HAL.
    46. Victor DeMiguel & Alberto Martín-Utrera & Francisco J Nogales & Raman Uppal & Andrew KarolyiEditor, 2020. "A Transaction-Cost Perspective on the Multitude of Firm Characteristics," Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 33(5), pages 2180-2222.
    47. Zilin Chen & Zhe Fei, 2021. "Characteristics-Based Portfolio Policy: Evidence from China," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(4), pages 1141-1158, March.
    48. Clements, A. & Silvennoinen, A., 2013. "Volatility timing: How best to forecast portfolio exposures," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 108-115.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mengting Li & Qifa Xu & Cuixia Jiang & Qinna Zhao, 2023. "The role of tail network topological characteristic in portfolio selection: A TNA‐PMC model," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 23(1), pages 37-57, March.
    2. Simon, Frederik & Weibels, Sebastian & Zimmermann, Tom, 2025. "Deep parametric portfolio policies," CFR Working Papers 23-01, University of Cologne, Centre for Financial Research (CFR), revised 2025.
    3. Michael Senescall & Rand Kwong Yew Low, 2024. "Quantitative Portfolio Management: Review and Outlook," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-25, September.
    4. Thomas Gehrig & Leopold Sögner & Arne Westerkamp, 2025. "Extending the demand system approach to asset pricing," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 39(1), pages 133-166, March.
    5. Qifa Xu & Lu Chen & Cuixia Jiang & Yezheng Liu, 2022. "Forecasting expected shortfall and value at risk with a joint elicitable mixed data sampling model," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(3), pages 407-421, April.
    6. Guillaume Coqueret & Tony Guida, 2020. "Training trees on tails with applications to portfolio choice," Post-Print hal-04144665, HAL.
    7. Fernandez-Perez, Adrian & Fuertes, Ana-Maria & Miffre, Joelle, 2021. "The risk premia of energy futures," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    8. Li, Sicong & DeMiguel, Victor & Martín-Utrera, Alberto, 2024. "Comparing factor models with price-impact costs," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    9. Tony Guida & Guillaume Coqueret, 2019. "Ensemble Learning Applied to Quant Equity: Gradient Boosting in a Multifactor Framework," Post-Print hal-02311104, HAL.
    10. Guillaume Chevalier & Guillaume Coqueret & Thomas Raffinot, 2022. "Supervised portfolios," Post-Print hal-04144588, HAL.
    11. Shuting Liu & Qifa Xu & Cuixia Jiang, 2021. "Systemic risk of China’s commercial banks during financial turmoils in 2010-2020: A MIDAS-QR based CoVaR approach," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(18), pages 1600-1609, October.
    12. Vigo Pereira, Caio, 2021. "Portfolio efficiency with high-dimensional data as conditioning information," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    13. Qifa Xu & Junqing Zuo & Cuixia Jiang & Yaoyao He, 2021. "A large constrained time‐varying portfolio selection model with DCC‐MIDAS: Evidence from Chinese stock market," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(3), pages 3417-3435, July.
    14. Jiang, Chonghui & Du, Jiangze & An, Yunbi & Zhang, Jinqing, 2021. "Factor tracking: A new smart beta strategy that outperforms naïve diversification," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 396-408.
    15. Guillaume Coqueret & Tony Guida, 2020. "Training trees on tails with applications to portfolio choice," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 288(1), pages 181-221, May.
    16. Mengting Li & Qifa Xu & Cuixia Jiang & Yezheng Liu, 2024. "The role of long‐ and short‐run correlation networks in international portfolio selection," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(3), pages 3147-3176, July.
    17. Eric Andr'e & Guillaume Coqueret, 2020. "Dirichlet policies for reinforced factor portfolios," Papers 2011.05381, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2021.
    18. Barroso, Pedro & Detzel, Andrew, 2021. "Do limits to arbitrage explain the benefits of volatility-managed portfolios?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(3), pages 744-767.
    19. Xu, Qifa & Chen, Lu & Jiang, Cuixia & Yu, Keming, 2020. "Mixed data sampling expectile regression with applications to measuring financial risk," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 469-486.
    20. Gschöpf, Philipp & Härdle, Wolfgang Karl & Mihoci, Andrija, 2015. "TERES: Tail event risk expectile based shortfall," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2015-047, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:148:y:2025:i:c:s0264999325000677. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30411 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.