IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v87y2025icp665-674.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy use rights trading policy and energy consumption?

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Lina

Abstract

Over the years, China’s extensive economic growth model has positioned the country as a major consumer of energy, posing significant challenges to sustainable development. In response, the Chinese government has made numerous efforts to limit energy intensity and reduce dependence on energy resources. The energy use rights trading policy (EURT) is an important attempt by the government to use market mechanisms to reduce energy usage and improve energy efficiency. Using data from 285 cities from 2006 to 2020, this study uses a difference-in-differences (DID) model to evaluate the effect of the EURT policy on energy usage and its underlying mechanisms. The findings revealed that the policy substantially reduced energy usage in pilot regions, which was confirmed through a series of robustness tests. The mechanism analysis further demonstrates that the policy lowers energy usage by promoting green technological innovation and increasing government attention to environmental protection. Additional analysis reveals that the negative impact of the policy on energy usage is significant in regions with fewer industrial enterprises and where local officials are in key phases of political promotion. These findings provide valuable insights for improving the policy and offer empirical evidence to support the expansion of pilot programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Lina, 2025. "Energy use rights trading policy and energy consumption?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 665-674.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:87:y:2025:i:c:p:665-674
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2025.06.022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S031359262500253X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eap.2025.06.022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:87:y:2025:i:c:p:665-674. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.